论著

社区老年女性糖尿病患者尿路感染常见病原菌调查

展开
  • 1.上海市黄浦区打浦桥街道社区卫生服务中心全科医学科,上海 200023
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院卢湾分院老年科,上海 200020

收稿日期: 2019-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2019-10-25

基金资助

上海市黄浦区卫生和计划生育委员会科研基金(HKM201733)

Investigation on common pathogens and related risk factors of urinary tract infection in elderly female diabetic patients in community

Expand
  • 1. General Medicine Department, Dapuqiao Community Health Center, Huangpu District, Shanghai 200023, China
    2. Geriatrics Medical Department, Ruijin Hospital, Luwan Branch, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200020, China

Received date: 2019-03-06

  Online published: 2019-10-25

摘要

目的:调查上海黄浦区打浦桥社区老年女性糖尿病合并尿路感染患者的病原菌分布和耐药情况,探究不同来源和就诊经历患者的病原学信息,为临床治疗提供指导意见。方法:选取214例至本社区卫生服务中心门诊就诊的糖尿病合并尿白细胞阳性的老年女性患者,收集其清洁中段尿标本,进行细菌鉴定及药敏试验。根据患者以往的就诊经历,分为社区组(A组)或综合医院组(B组),比较2组患者的基本情况、清洁中段尿标本所分离的病原菌构成情况及药敏结果。结果:①214例患者中有166例尿标本培养出病原菌,其中A组94例;B组72例。A组优势病原菌前5位依次为大肠埃希菌、变形杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、肠球菌、无乳链球菌和铜绿假单胞菌,B组前5位依次为大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯和阴沟肠杆菌、肠球菌、变形杆菌、洛菲氏不动杆菌;2组均未检出真菌。②对大肠埃希菌耐药率超过50%的药物进行分析,发现A组分别为氨苄西林(77.55%)、左氧氟沙星(58.33%)、环丙沙星(58.00%);B组分别为头孢呋辛(97.73 %)、氨苄西林(97.62%)、头孢他啶(88.64%)、头孢吡肟(82.93%)、环丙沙星(82.93%)、左氧氟沙星(82.22%)、复方新诺明(51.16%)。③B组青霉素类及其酶抑制剂和二代、三代头孢菌素(包括头孢他定、头孢吡肟、头孢呋辛、头孢西丁)对大肠埃希菌耐药率均显著高于A组(P<0.01)。2组检出的大肠埃希菌均对氨苄西林、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星耐药,但在耐药率上A组达58%以上,B组达82%以上,2组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:糖尿病老年女性患者合并的尿路感染中,大肠埃希菌是其主要病原菌,但不同就诊经历患者的优势病原菌顺序及耐药情况间存在差异。

本文引用格式

顾勤, 王泰蓉, 陈荔萍, 吴舒窈, 沈祎 . 社区老年女性糖尿病患者尿路感染常见病原菌调查[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019 , 18(05) : 538 -542 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2019.05.010

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens in elderly women with diabetes mellitus complicated with urinary tract infection in Dapuqiao community, Huangpu District, Shanghai, and to study the etio-logical information of patients with different treatment experiences in the region, so as to provide a guidance for clinical treatment. Methods: From June 2016 to June 2018, 214 elderly women with diabetes mellitus and leukocyte positive urine samples were collected for bacterial identification and drug sensitivity test. The patients were divided into community health center group (group A) or general hospital group (group B) according to their previous therapeutic experience whether had been treated in community health center or in general hospital. The basic situation of the two groups and the composition of pathogenic bacteria isolated from clean midstream urine samples were compared and analyzed with the results of drug susceptibility. Results: ① There were 166 patients with pathogenic bacteria, of which 94 were in group A and 72 were in group B. The top five dominant pathogens in group A were Escherichia coli, Proteus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus, Streptococcus agalactiae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the top five pathogens in group B were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus cloacae, Enterococcus, Proteus and Acinetobacter loffei. No fungus was detected in both groups; ② Drug analysis showed that the drug resistance rate to Escherichia coli exceeded 50%. In group A, the drug resistance was: ampicillin (77.55%), levofloxacin (58.33%) and ciprofloxacin (58.00%); in group B was: cefuroxime (97.73%), ampicillin (97.62%), ceftazidime (88.64%), cefepime (82.93%), ciprofloxacin (82.93%), levo-floxacin (82.22%), compound neomycin (51.16%). ③ The resistance of Escherichia coli to penicillin and its enzyme inhibitors and second generation, third generation, third generation of cephalosporins (including Ceftazidime, Cefepime, Cefuroxime and Cefoxitin) in Group B was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.01). Both groups were resistant to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, but the degree of resistance was 58% in group A and 82% in group B. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: Escherichia coli is the main pathogen in elderly women with diabetes mellitus complicated with urinary tract infection. However, there are differences in the order of dominant pathogens and drug resistance between patients with different treatment experiences.

参考文献

[1] 陈玲, 崔大伟. 2型糖尿病合并尿路感染患者临床特点与病原菌的耐药性探讨[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2016, 26(16):2419-2424.
[2] Hamdan HZ, Kubbara E, Adam AM, et al. Urinary tract infections and antimicrobial sensitivity among diabetic patients at Khartoum, Sudan[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2015, 14:26.
[3] Yeshitela B, Gebre-Selassie S, Feleke Y. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTI) in patients with diabetes mellitus in Tikur Anbessa Specialized University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia[J]. Ethiop Med J, 2012, 50(3):239-249.
[4] Qiao LD, Chen S, Yang Y, et al. Characteristics of urinary tract infection pathogens and their in vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in China: data from a multicenter study[J]. BMJ Open, 2013, 3(12):e004152.
[5] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2013年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2014, 6(7):448-483.
[6] 胡必杰, 刘荣辉, 陈文森, 等. 医院感染暴发管理与处理[M]//胡必杰. SIFIC医院感染预防与控制临床实践指引. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 2013:314-319.
[7] 时敏敏, 孟强, 于世鹏. 糖尿病合并尿路感染的危险因素及致病菌分析[J]. 中国临床实用医学, 2017, 8(1):72-74.
[8] 韩竖霞, 倪维. 老年糖尿病患者尿路感染的病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2018, 15(10):55-57.
[9] 杨宗桥, 付善书, 付敏. 糖尿病患者尿路感染病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2018, 15(20):3129-3132.
[10] 安彩霞, 房辉, 杨岳. 老年女性2型糖尿病患者尿路感染的病原菌分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(6):1356-1358.
[11] 董明驹, 史莉, 童伟. 糖尿病患者合并尿路感染病原菌分布及耐药性[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014, 24(3):582-584.
[12] van Nieuwkoop C, Bonten TN, van't Wout JW, et al. Procalcitonin reflects bacteremia and bacterial load in urosepsis syndrome: a prospective observational study[J]. Crit Care, 2010, 14(6):R206.
[13] 黄金婷, 陈劲, 刘小玲, 等. 老年2型糖尿病患者自我血糖监测的现状及对策[J]. 安徽医学, 2019, 40(8):950-952.
文章导航

/