Diagnostic value of colonoscopic narrow-band imaging for the colon polypoid lesions with diameter<2 cm and analysis of misdiagnosis
Received date: 2019-07-24
Online published: 2022-07-14
目的: 分析结肠镜窄带成像(narrow-band imaging,NBI)技术对直径<2 cm结肠息肉样病变的诊断价值。方法: 选取2018年2月至2019年2月期间在我院诊断的结肠息肉样病变患者86例,采用结肠镜常规模式和结肠镜NBI模式观察病灶的整体形态、腺管开口类型、毛细血管形态,并进行清晰度评分,同时在结肠镜下采集标本进行病理活检,以组织病理学诊断结果作为金标准,对NBI的诊断价值及误诊原因进行分析。结果: 86例患者共检出结肠息肉样病变104个,病灶直径为0.1~2.0 cm,平均直径为(0.72±0.34) cm,采用结肠镜NBI下国际结肠直肠病变内镜(NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic,NICE)分型,结果提示1型的结肠息肉样病变为39个(37.50%),2型为57个(54.81%),3型为8个(7.69%),不同NICE分型的结肠息肉样病变间的形态学特征差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。病理学检查结果显示,非肿瘤性息肉为38个(36.54%),肿瘤性息肉为66个(63.46%)。结肠镜常规模式诊断结肠肿瘤性息肉的灵敏度为81.82%,特异度为81.57%,准确率为81.73%,NBI模式诊断结肠肿瘤性息肉的灵敏度为92.42%,特异度为89.47%,准确率为91.35%,2种方法间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。进一步分析显示,结肠镜NBI模式诊断直径<1 cm和1~2 cm肿瘤性息肉的灵敏度分别为92.59%和92.31%,特异度分别为86.67%和91.30%,准确率分别为90.48%和91.94%;不同直径的结肠息肉病变,采用结肠镜常规模式和NBI模式诊断结果与病理诊断间的一致性Kappa值分别为0.793和0.829。结肠镜NBI模式误诊的原因主要为肠道准备不足和病灶微结构显示不清。结论: 结肠镜NBI模式的结肠息肉检出率较结肠镜常规模式有所提升,在直径<2 cm的结肠息肉样病变鉴别诊断中具有较高价值,且对直径<1 cm的结肠息肉样病变性质鉴别诊断也具有较高准确率,可在临床推广应用。
吴友伟, 张健, 赵素平, 吕飒美, 史丽萍 . 结肠镜窄带成像技术对直径<2 cm结肠息肉样病变的诊断价值及误诊分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020 , 19(06) : 588 -593 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2020.06.008
Objective: To study the diagnostic value of colonoscopic narrow-band imaging (NBI) for colon polypoid lesions with the diameter <2 cm. Methods: A total of 86 patients with the colon polypoid lesions diagnosed in our hospital during February 2018 to February 2019 were enrolled. Routine enteroscopy and colonoscopic NBI were performed in the patients, and the morphology of colonpolypoid lesions including the overall lesion, glandular opening type and capillary were observed, and the images were assessed with clarity score. Biopsy specimens obtained during performing colonoscopy were analyzed by pathological examination, and the diagnostic efficacy of NBI were assessed by comparing the results of pathological examination. Results: A total of 104 colon polypoid lesions were detected among 86 patients, and the diameters of lesions were 0.1-2.0 cm and the average value was(0.72±0.34) cm. The NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic(NICE) classification of lesions were summarized as follows: 39 (37.50%) colon polypoid lesions were type 1, 57 (54.81%) lesions were type 2 and 8 (7.69%) were type 3. There were no significant difference in the morphological characteristics of colon polypoid lesions between the different NICE types (P>0.05). The pathological examination showed that there were 38 non-neoplastic polyps (36.54%) and 66 neoplastic polyps (63.46%). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of colonoscopy for diagnosing the neoplastic polyps were 81.82%, 81.57% and 81.73%, respectively, while the values of NBI colonoscopy were 92.42%, 89.47% and 91.35%. The diagnostic efficacy between two methods were different (P<0.05). Further analysis showed that the diagnostic sensitivities of NBI colonoscopy for neoplastic polyps with the diameter<1cm and 1-2 cm were 92.59% and 92.31%, the specificities were 86.67% and 91.30%, and the accuracy rates were 90.48% and 91.94%. The consistency Kappa values of enteroscopy and colonoscopic NBI with results of pathology for the neoplastic polyps of different diameters were 0.793 and 0.829, respectively. The causes for misdiagnosing colon polypoid lesions by colonoscopic NBI were insufficient bowel preparations and blurred display of microstructure. Conclusions: Compared with the colonoscopy, the accuracy of NBI colonoscopy for diagnosing colon polyps is improved. The NBI colonoscopy is worth to be applied in clinical practice since it has high diagnostic value for colon polypoid lesions with the diameter <2 cm and also shows high accuracy for judging the characteristic of lesions with the diameter <1 cm.
Key words: Colon polypoid lesions; Colonoscopy; Narrow-band imaging
[1] | 赵莹, 聂继盛. 结肠息肉临床病理研究分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2018, 18(4):526-527. |
[2] | Chen XQ, Mao JY, Li WB, et al. Association between CYP24A1 polymorphisms and the risk of colonic polyps and colon cancer in a Chinese population[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(28):5179-5186. |
[3] | 栾哲, 李闻, 刘迎娣, 等. 健康体检中内镜检查的应用价值[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2017, 19(3):216-218. |
[4] | Vişovan II, Tançău M, Pascu O, et al. The role of narrow band imaging in colorectal polyp detection[J]. Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 2017, 17(2):152-158. |
[5] | 刘雪琴, 杨松涛. 内镜下窄带成像技术对结直肠息肉样病变的诊断价值[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2016, 22(S2): 4-5. |
[6] | 杨雪, 刘培曦, 肖迅, 等. 窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分型在结直肠病变诊治中的价值[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(5):1-6. |
[7] | 苏燕波, 唐建光, 刘晓敏, 等. 内镜窄带成像技术在大肠息肉样病变诊断中的价值[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2012, 18(3):225-228. |
[8] | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(3):177-193. |
[9] | 陈万青, 李贺, 孙可欣, 等. 2014年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2018, 40(1):5-13. |
[10] | 吴进峰, 余细球, 陈科云, 等. 结直肠息肉漏诊的多中心回顾性分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2017, 34(5):318-321. |
[11] | 刘萍, 雷婷, 吴莉君.1 992例结肠息肉内镜治疗术后并发症分析及处理[J]. 华南国防医学杂志, 2016, 30(8):536-537. |
[12] | 杨振华, 郑嘉岗. 窄带成像技术在慢性胃炎中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2016, 13(z1):325-327. |
[13] | Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging[J]. Gastroenterology, 2012, 143(3):599-607. |
[14] | Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG, et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 78(4):625-632. |
[15] | 中华医学会消化内镜学分会消化系早癌内镜诊断与治疗协, 中华医学会消化病学分会消化道肿瘤协作组, 中华医学会消化内镜学分会肠道学组, 等. 中国早期结直肠癌及癌前病变筛查与诊治共识意见(2014年11月·重庆)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2015, 54(4):375-389. |
[16] | Guo TJ, Chen W, Chen Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in differentiating neoplastic colorectal polyps from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2018, 53(6):701-711. |
[17] | 乔琨, 刘芳, 田书信, 等. 内镜下窄带成像技术对结直肠息肉样病变的诊断价值[J]. 山东医药, 2016, 56(10):36-37. |
[18] | 韩旭, 郭亚慧, 时晓冬, 等. 2019版《中国消化内镜诊疗相关肠道准备指南》解读[J]. 临床荟萃, 2020, 35(1):72-75. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |