收稿日期: 2025-01-14
录用日期: 2025-04-04
网络出版日期: 2025-06-25
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(82070740)
Study on predictors for treatment efficacy of rituximab in patients with PLA2R-negative primary membranous nephropathy
Received date: 2025-01-14
Accepted date: 2025-04-04
Online published: 2025-06-25
目的:观察临床表现为肾病综合征的磷脂酶A2受体(phospholipase A2 receptor,PLA2R)阴性的原发性膜性肾病(primary membranous nephropathy,PMN)患者使用利妥昔单抗(rituximab,RTX)的临床疗效,并分析疗效预测相关指标。方法:回顾性收集上海交通大学附属瑞金医院2020年3月至2024年3月间,经肾活检确诊为PLA2R阴性且临床表现为肾病综合征的19例PMN患者,所有患者均使用RTX治疗;同时匹配PLA2R阳性且临床表现为肾病综合征,并使用RTX治疗的38例PMN患者作为对照。最少随访6个月(中位12个月),观察这2组患者使用RTX的临床疗效,并分析可预测RTX治疗PLA2R阴性MN患者疗效的相关指标。结果:PLA2R阴性的PMN患者,采用RTX治疗12个月时,与基线相比,总体24 h尿蛋白定量从(9.8±4.3)g/d下降至(2.6±2.6)g/d,总体血清白蛋白从(20.3±4.3)g/L上升至(36.4±7.1)g/L(P<0.05),总体估算肾小球滤过率变化无统计学意义[(90.7±30.0)mL·min-1·1.73m-2比(84.4±22.19)mL·min-1·1.73m-2](P>0.05)。PLA2R阴性组总体缓解率在治疗3个月(57.89%)、6个月(57.89%)、12个月(85.71%)时与PLA2R阳性组相当(P>0.05)。治疗3个月及6个月时,PLA2R阴性组的完全缓解率高于PLA2R抗体阳性组(3个月时,21.5%比0,P=0.009 8;6个月时36.84%比10.53%,P=0.030 5),差异有统计学意义。单因素logistic回归分析显示,影响PLA2R阴性PMN患者RTX治疗12个月时临床缓解的变量包括,3个月时24 h尿蛋白定量(OR=0.993,P=0.047 1)及3个月时血清白蛋白(OR=1.309,P=0.048 8)。结论:RTX治疗PLA2R阴性的PMN有效,与PLA2R阳性组相比,治疗12个月时总缓解率相当,治疗3个月时完全缓解率略胜一筹。RTX治疗3个月时24 h尿蛋白定量及血清白蛋白水平可能作为PLA2R阴性PMN患者12个月时临床缓解情况的预测指标。
徐丽梨 , 胡晓帆 , 李灏 , 王伟铭 . 利妥昔单抗治疗PLA2R阴性的原发性膜性肾病患者疗效预测相关指标的研究[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025 , 24(03) : 279 -285 . DOI: 10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.03.006
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in patients with phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)-negative primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) presenting as nephrotic syndrome, and to identify predictors for treatment efficacy. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 19 biopsy-proven PLA2R-negative PMN patients with nephrotic syndrome who received RTX at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine between March 2020 and March 2024. Additionally, 38 PLA2R-positive PMN patients with nephrotic syndrome who received RTX were matched as controls. All patients were followed for at least 6 months (median = 12 months) to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RTX in both groups and to analyze potential predictors of treatment efficacy in PLA2R-negative MN patients. Results In PLA2R-negative PMN patients treated with RTX for 12 months, the 24-hour proteinuria significantly decreased from (9.8±4.3) g/d to (2.6±2.6) g/d and serum albumin increased from (20.3±4.3) g/L to (36.4±7.1) g/L (P<0.05). The overall change in estimated glomerular filtration rate showed no statistical significance [(90.7±30.0) mL·min-1·1.73 m-2 vs. (84.4±22.19) mL·min-1·1.73 m-2] (P>0.05). Overall remission rates in the PLA2R-negative group at 3 months (57.89%), 6 months (57.89%), 12 months (85.71%) were comparable to those in the PLA2R-positive group (P>0.05). However, the complete remission rate was significantly higher in the PLA2R-negative group at 3 months (21.5% vs. 0%, P=0.009 8) and 6 months (36.84% vs. 10.53%, P=0.030 5), indicating statistical significance. The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that factors influencing clinical remission at 12 months of RTX treatment in PLA2R-negative PMN patients were 3-month 24-hour proteinuria (OR=0.993, P=0.047 1) and 3-month serum albumin (OR=1.309, P=0.048 8). Conclusion RTX treatment is effective in treating PLA2R-negative PMN. Compared with the PLA2R-positive group, the overall remission rate at 12 months was comparable, with a slightly higher complete remission rate at 3 months. The 3-month 24-hour proteinuria and 3-month serum albumin levels may serve as potential predictors for clinical remission at 12 months in PLA2R-negative PMN patients.
| [1] | PAN X, XU J, REN H, et al. Changing spectrum of biopsy-proven primary glomerular diseases over the past 15 years: a single-center study in China[J]. Contrib Nephrol, 2013,181:22-30. |
| [2] | XU X, NING Y, SHANG W, et al. Analysis of 4931 renal biopsy data in central China from 1994 to 2014[J]. Ren Fail, 2016, 38(7):1021-1030. |
| [3] | DEBIEC H, RONCO P. PLA2R autoantibodies and PLA2R glomerular deposits in membranous nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364(7):689-690. |
| [4] | ROSENZWAJG M, LANGUILLE E, DEBIEC H, et al. B- and T-cell subpopulations in patients with severe idiopathic membranous nephropathy may predict an early response to rituximab[J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 92(1):227-237. |
| [5] | Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular di-seases[J]. Kidney Int, 2021, 100(4S):S1-S276. |
| [6] | FERVENZA F C, APPEL G B, BARBOUR S J, et al. Rituximab or cyclosporine in the treatment of membranous nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(1):36-46. |
| [7] | CARAVACA-FONTáN F, FERNáNDEZ-JUáREZ G M, FLOEGE J, et al. The management of membranous nephropathy-an update[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2022, 37(6):1033-1042. |
| [8] | TOMAS N M, BECK L H JR, MEYER-SCHWESINGER C, et al. Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 371(24):2277-2287. |
| [9] | SETHI S, DEBIEC H, MADDEN B, et al. Neural epidermal growth factor-like 1 protein (NELL-1) associated membranous nephropathy[J]. Kidney Int, 2020, 97(1):163-174. |
| [10] | CAZA T N, STOREY A J, HASSEN S I, et al. Discovery of seven novel putative antigens in membranous nephropathy and membranous lupus nephritis identified by mass spectrometry[J]. Kidney Int, 2023, 103(3):593-606. |
| [11] | SETHI S, BECK L H JR, GLASSOCK R J, et al. Mayo Clinic consensus report on membranous nephropathy: proposal for a novel classification[J]. Kidney Int, 2023, 104(6):1092-1102. |
| [12] | HU X, WANG X, YU X, et al. The role of renal PLA2R staining combined with serum PLA2R antibody in membranous nephropathy risk stratification[J]. J Clin Med. 2023; 13(1):68. |
| [13] | BECK LH JR, BONEGIO R G, LAMBEAU G, et al. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(1):11-21. |
| [14] | DAHAN K, DEBIEC H, PLAISIER E, et al. Rituximab for severe membranous nephropathy: a 6-month trial with extended follow-up[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 28(1):348-358. |
| [15] | SCOLARI F, DELBARBA E, SANTORO D, et al. Ritu-ximab or cyclophosphamide in the treatment of membranous nephropathy: the RI-CYCLO randomized trial[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2021, 32(4):972-982. |
| [16] | GUO H, YAO Y, ZHOU J, et al. The cutoff value and prognosis of anti-PLA2R antibody for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective study in China[J]. Ren Fail, 2023, 45(2):2253922. |
| [17] | LIU Y, LI X, MA C, et al. Serum anti-PLA2R antibody as a diagnostic biomarker of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: The optimal cut-off value for Chinese patients[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2018,476:9-14. |
| [18] | ZHOU Z, ZOU Y, KE B, et al. How to choose treatment regimens for idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with PLA2R-negative: a single-center retrospective cohort study[J]. Immunotargets Ther, 2025,14:515-522. |
| [19] | BARBOUR S J, FERVENZA F C, INDURUWAGE D, et al. Anti-PLA2R antibody levels and clinical risk factors for treatment nonresponse in membranous nephropathy[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023, 18(10):1283-1293. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |