外科理论与实践 ›› 2023, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (03): 260-266.doi: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2023.03.014
收稿日期:
2023-02-01
出版日期:
2023-05-25
发布日期:
2023-08-18
通讯作者:
吴硕东,E-mail:基金资助:
ZHANG Zhen, HAN Jinyan, YU Xiaopeng, DENG Tianlin, WU Xiaodong, WU Shuodong()
Received:
2023-02-01
Online:
2023-05-25
Published:
2023-08-18
摘要:
目的:回顾性分析经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流(percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage,PTGBD)在急性胆源性胰腺炎(acute biliary pancreatitis, ABP)病人治疗中的临床疗效。方法:纳入2014年1月至2021年11月我院普通外科诊治的ABP病人244例。研究组76例,经PTGBD治疗,41例症状缓解后行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP)治疗;对照组168例,均未行PTGBD治疗,其中ERCP治疗49例,保守治疗119例。比较两组ERCP治疗后胰腺炎(post-ERCP pancreatitis, PEP)发生率、胆囊切除术以及同时胆道引流的术后不良事件发生率。结果:研究组PEP发生率明显较对照组低[26.8%(11/41)比46.9%(23/49),P=0.008]。两组治疗后期(研究组73例和对照组152例)行胆囊切除术或胆囊切除胆道引流术。研究组手术时间较对照组短[(76.3±28.3) min比(121.6±34.9) min,P=0.011],术中出血量较少[(65.7±27.6) mL比(99.2±60.3) mL,P=0.028], 术后腹腔引流时间缩短[(3.6± 2.5) d比(8.9±4.9) d,P=0.016]。研究组术后脓毒症[2.7%(2例)比5.3%(8例),P=0.003]、二次手术[1.4%(1例)比3.9%(6例),P<0.001]、术后转重症监护室发生率[4.1%(3例)比7.2%(11例),P=0.028]以及死亡率[0比1.3%(2例),P<0.001]均低于对照组。结论:PTGBD治疗ABP简单有效,符合损伤控制治疗理念,值得临床推广。
中图分类号:
张震, 韩金岩, 于晓鹏, 邓天麟, 吴晓东, 吴硕东. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎疗效的研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2023, 28(03): 260-266.
ZHANG Zhen, HAN Jinyan, YU Xiaopeng, DENG Tianlin, WU Xiaodong, WU Shuodong. Study on effects of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Surgery Concepts & Practice, 2023, 28(03): 260-266.
表1
病人基本情况和生化检查结果[x±s/n(%)]
Item | Control group (n=168) | Study group (n=76) | t/χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) Gender [n(%)] Female Male Signs and symptoms Murphy sign [n(%)] Peritonitis [n(%)] Temperature (℃) Heart rate (times/min) SIRS [n(%)] Habits [n(%)] Drinking Smoking Disease history [n(%)] Surgical treatment Cardiovascular disease Neural disease Respiratory disease Diabetes Biochemical indexes WBC (×109 cells/L) HT (%) ALB (g/L) ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) ALP (U/L) GGT (U/L) TBIL (μmol/L) DBIL (μmol/L) SCr (μmol/L) Ca2+ (mmol/L) INR AMY (U/L) LPS (U/L) | 73±11 89 (53.0) 79 (47.0) 48 (28.6) 23 (13.7) 36.9±0.8 93±17 82 (48.1) 45 (26.8) 56(33.3) 86(51.2) 69(41.1) 27(16.1) 64(38.1) 20(11.9) 12.2±6.0 38.0±5.3 36.6±3.7 199±203 179±283 194±93 389±229 57.9±50.0 42.9±39.4 74.3±48.3 1.92±0.10 1.0±0.18 578.1±413.6 1296.5±1409.9 | 68±10 41 (53.9) 35 (46.1) 34 (44.7) 14 (18.4) 37.5±1.2 97±18 38 (50.0) 21 (27.6) 27 (35.5) 35 (46.1) 26 (34.2) 7 (9.2) 31 (40.8) 13 (17.1) 13.3±4.8 39.4±5.3 37.5±5.1 227±214 194±317 218±111 402±251 68.7±60.1 52.2±46.5 78.6±52.9 1.99±0.11 1.2±0.19 669.8±567.3 1 382.7±1 669.8 | 2.53 0.02 2.05 0.51 0.26 0.98 2.49 1.03 2.17 0.25 3.76 1.48 4.02 1.39 3.84 1.97 2.08 2.51 1.16 3.89 0.32 2.49 2.75 0.23 0.11 0.94 4.07 4.92 | 0.141 0.856 0.165 0.540 0.811 0.429 0.132 0.274 0.161 0.620 0.069 0.228 0.056 0.241 0.066 0.183 0.210 0.168 0.347 0.063 0.792 0.151 0.127 0.830 0.902 0.495 0.024 0.011 |
表2
研究组和对照组ABP病人择期胆囊切除术或胆囊切除胆道引流术相关结果的比较[x±s/n(%)]
Outcomes | Control group (n=152) | Study group (n=73) | t/χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
LC/LCBDE[n(%)] LC to OC or LCBDE to OCBDE[n(%)] OC/OCBDE[n(%)] Operative time (min) Intraoperative blood loss (mL) Abdominal drainage time (d) | 131(86.2) 13(8.6) 8(5.3) 121.6±34.9 99.2±60.3 8.9±4.9 | 70(95.9) 2(2.7) 1(1.4) 76.3±28.3 65.7±27.6 3.6±2.5 | 4.88 2.68 1.95 5.24 3.17 4.61 | <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.011 0.028 0.016 |
表3
研究组和对照组ABP病人择期胆囊切除术或胆囊切除胆道引流术后不良事件及死亡发生率的比较[n(%)]
Adverse events | Control group (n=152) | Study group (n=73) | χ2 value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sepsis ICU Operation related injury Reoperation Cardiac dysfunction Respiratory dysfunction Renal dysfunction Nerve dysfunction Mortality | 8(5.3) 11(7.2) 6(3.9) 6(3.9) 22(14.5) 26(17.1) 18(11.8) 9(5.9) 2(1.3) | 2(2.7) 3(4.1) 2(2.7) 1(1.4) 8(11.0) 11(15.1) 8(11.0) 3(4.1) 0 | 0.74 0.83 0.21 1.09 0.53 0.15 0.04 0.32 0.97 | 0.003 0.028 0.332 <0.001 0.083 0.524 0.736 0.181 <0.001 |
[13] |
CHEN Q, JIN P, JI X, et al. Management of difficult or failed biliary access in initial ERCP: a review of current literature[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2019, 43(4):365-372.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.09.004 URL |
[14] |
KÜHN J P, BUSEMANN A, LERCH M M, et al. Percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts compared with patients with dilated intrahepatic bile ducts[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195(4):851-857.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3461 URL |
[15] |
DEBENEDET A T, ELMUNZER B J, MCCARTHY S T, et al. Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Gastroentrol, 2013, 108(11):1696-1704.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.217 URL |
[16] |
SHENOY S M, SHENOY S, GOPAL S, et al. Clinicomicrobiological analysis of patients with cholangitis[J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2014, 32(2):157-160.
doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.129802 URL |
[17] |
BAI Y, GAI F, GAO J, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics cannot prevent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato-graphy-induced cholangitis: a meta-analysis[J]. Pancreas, 2009, 38(2):126-130.
doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318189fl6d URL |
[18] |
MASCI E, TOTI G, MARIONA A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96(2):417-423.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x URL |
[19] |
MUANGKAEW P, KAMALAPORN P, MINGPHRUEDHI S, et al. Outcomes of delayed endoscopic retrograde cho-langiopancreatography in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(9):913-918.
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.11.011 URL |
[20] |
MUKAI S, ITOI T, TSUCHIYA T, et al. Urgent and emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis[J]. Dig Endosc, 2023, 35(1):47-57.
doi: 10.1111/den.v35.1 URL |
[21] |
BANKS P A, BOLLEN T L, DERVENIS C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus[J]. Gut, 2013, 62(1):102-111.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 URL |
[22] |
SCHEPERS N J, HALLENSLEBEN N D L, BESSELINK M G, et al. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (APEC): a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10245):167-176.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30539-0 URL |
[23] | YANG J P, TIAN Z. Analysis of the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis after percuta-neous transhepatic gallbladder puncture and drainage[J]. Evid Based Complementary Altern Med, 2022, 2022:2071326. |
[24] |
YU B R, ZHI X T, LI Q, et al. The efficacy and safety of preoperative cholangiography via percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(2):1355-1361.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08414-0 |
[25] |
SEE T C. Acute biliary interventions[J]. Clin Radiol, 2020, 75(5):398.e9-398.e18.
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.11.041 URL |
[26] | LI Y L, WONG K H, CHIU K W, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk patients with acute cholangitis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(19):e0735. |
[27] |
YU W, LI W, WANG Z, et al. Early percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and papillotomy treatment for severe gallstone associated acute pancreatitis[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2007, 83(977):187-191.
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.047746 URL |
[28] | KUCSERIK L P, MÁRTA K, VINCZE Á, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for delaying cholecystectomy in mild acute biliarry pancreatitis (EMILY study): protocol of a multicentre randomized clinical trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(7):e02555. |
[1] | LOWENFELS A B, LANKISCH P G, MAISONNEUVE P. What is the risk of biliary pancreatitis in patients with gallstones[J]. Gastroenterology, 2000, 119(3):879-880. |
[2] | 毛恩强, 李兆申. 急性胰腺炎病因诊断与分类的再认识[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志, 2019, 19 (6):401-403. |
MAO E Q, LI Z S. Re-recognition of the etiological diagnosis and classification for acute pancreatitis[J]. Chin J Pancreatology, 2019, 19(6):401-403. | |
[3] |
MAURER L R, MAATMAN T K, LUCKHURST C M, et al. Risk of gallstone-related complications in necrotizing pancreatitis patients treated with a step-up approach: the experience of two tertiary care centers[J]. Surgery, 2021, 169(5):1086-1092.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.002 URL |
[4] |
NITSCHE C, MAERTIN S, SCHEIBER J, et al. Drug-induced pancreatitis[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2012, 14(2):131-138.
doi: 10.1007/s11894-012-0245-9 URL |
[5] |
SADR-AZODI O, ANDRÉN-SANDBERG Å, ORSINI N, et al. Cigarette smoking, smoking cessation and acute pancreatitis: a prospective population-based study[J]. Gut, 2012, 61(2):262-267.
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300566 URL |
[6] |
GARCÍA DE LA FILIA MOLINA I, GARCÍA GARCÍA DE PAREDES A, MARTÍNEZ ORTEGA A, et al. Biliary sphincterotomy reduces the risk of acute gallstone pancreatitis recurrence in non-candidates for cholecystectomy[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2019, 51(11):1567-1573.
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.007 URL |
[7] | 杨玉龙. 从胆胰管汇合部疾病角度分析和认识急性胆源性胰腺炎及治疗[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(6):456-459. |
YANG Y L. Treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis induced by biliary-pancreatic confluence disease[J]. J Surg Concepts Pract, 2020, 25(6):456-459. | |
[8] |
LEPPÄNIEMI A, TOLONEN M, TARASCONI A, et al. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. World J Emerg Surg,2019, 14(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0247-0 |
[9] |
LEE P J, PAPACHRISTOU G I. New insights into acute pancreatitis[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 16(8):479-496.
doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0158-2 |
[10] | TSE F, YUAN Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 16(5):CD009779. |
[11] |
SCHULZ C, SCHIRRA J, MAYERLE J. Indications for endoscopic retro-grade cholangiopancreatography and cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(1):11-13.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11402 URL |
[12] | SVATOŇ R, KALA Z, NOVOTNÝ I, et al. The timing of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis[J]. Rozhl Chir, 2019, 98(1):10-13. |
[29] |
KIRIYAMA S, KOZAKA K, TAKADA T, et al. Tokyo guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos)[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2018, 25(1):17-30.
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.2018.25.issue-1 URL |
[1] | 贺正威, 庞澄宇, 吴卫泽. 急性胰腺炎微创治疗进展与思考[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 277-281. |
[2] | 赵志宇, 赵冰 综述, 毛恩强 审校. 经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流在临床的应用及作用机制[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(04): 349-353. |
[3] | 张舒, 王露露, 孙璟, 江石湖. 降钙素原和C反应蛋白在急性胆源性胰腺炎中的诊断及预后价值比较[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(06): 668-671. |
[4] | 姚伟, 孔雷, 吴庆华, 陆一凡, 叶靳华, 赵良超, 徐敬慈, 李能平. 早期腹部CT检查在制定急性胆源性胰腺炎诊疗方案中的作用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2019, 24(03): 236-241. |
[5] | 杨鹏, 邢冰, 孙伟, 武宗寅,. 右胸V_4R导联ST段抬高在急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死的临床价值分析[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2019, 14(02): 94-98. |
[6] | 王建承,吴卫泽,陈胜,费健,叶忻,张圣道. 急性胆源性胰腺炎内镜治疗作用的探讨[J]. 外科理论与实践, 1999, 4(04): 255-5. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||