论著

创伤性脾破裂行脾动脉介入栓塞与外科手术治疗的临床比较研究

展开
  • 1.石河子大学医学院第一附属医院放射科,新疆 石河子 832000
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院放射科,上海 200025

收稿日期: 2019-02-01

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-25

基金资助

兵团科技攻关与成果转化计划项目(2015AD001)

Splenic artery embolization versus surgery in treatment of traumatic splenic injury: a comparative study

Expand
  • 1. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University Medical College of Medicine, Xinjiang Shihezi 832000, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China

Received date: 2019-02-01

  Online published: 2020-05-25

摘要

目的:对比研究脾动脉介入栓塞与外科手术治疗创伤性脾破裂的临床疗效。方法:收集石河子大学医学院第一附属医院2014年至2018年间创伤性脾破裂病人40例作为研究对象,其中20例采用脾动脉栓塞治疗;另外20例行外科手术的病人作为对照组进行比较。评估介入治疗疗效、术后血压、血细胞变化、操作时间、出血量、住院时间及术后并发症等情况。结果:行脾动脉介入栓塞组病人均治疗成功,且操作时间、出血量、住院时间及术后并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:创伤性脾破裂病人行脾动脉介入栓塞治疗是一种安全有效的治疗方式。

本文引用格式

张立鹏, 王忠敏, 赵新建 . 创伤性脾破裂行脾动脉介入栓塞与外科手术治疗的临床比较研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020 , 25(03) : 222 -226 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.03.010

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect between splenic artery interventional embolization and surgery in the management of patients with traumatic splenic injury. Methods Forty patients with traumatic splenic injury in the First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University Medical College from 2014 to 2018 were studied for comparison, 20 cases with splenic artery embolization and 20 cases with surgery as control group. The index were evaluated including the efficacy of interventional therapy, postoperative blood pressure, account of blood cells, procedure duration, blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative complications. Results All patients in splenic artery interventional embolization group were successfully treated. Reduced procedure duration, less blood loss, less time of hospitalization and less cases with postoperative complications were found significantly (P<0.05) when compared with those in control group. Conclusions Splenic artery interventional embolization was safe and effective in the treatment of patients with traumatic splenic injury.

参考文献

[1] 刘林, 李毅, 黄文. 脾动脉栓塞术在外伤性脾破裂中的临床应用[J]. 微创医学, 2016, 11(5):682-684.
[2] Muller TS, Sommer C. Traumatic splenic injury[J]. Ther Umsch, 2013, 70(3):177-184.
[3] 张澍, 李宗芳. 脾脏功能与脾脏外科研究现状与展望[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2014, 31(2):231-233.
[4] 龚溪明, 吕福华, 叶贤德, 等. 外伤性脾破裂急症介入栓塞治疗的临床应用[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2014, 23(7):623-625.
[5] 高君, 张延峰, 丁雪梅, 等. 外伤性脾破裂现代救治及相关问题[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2008, 36(11):58-59.
[6] 曾国祥, 邬善敏, 王柏林. 部分脾栓塞术治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床应用[J]. 腹部外科, 2015, 28(3):199-202.
[7] Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver(1994 revison)[J]. J trauma, 1995, 38(3):323-324.
[8] 罗光辉, 丁自海, 李忠华, 等. 脾脏血管的应用解剖学研究进展与保脾治疗现状[J]. 广东医学, 2011, 32(2):256-259.
[9] Abraham RJ, Illyas AJ, Marotta T, et al. Endovascular exclusion of a splenic artery anenrysm using a pipeline embolization device[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2012, 23(1):131-135.
[10] 叶广坡, 项和平, 李贺, 等. 外伤性脾破裂的外科诊治进展[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2017, 20(6):762-765.
[11] Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR. Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states[J]. Lancet, 2011, 378(9785):86-97.
[12] Weng J, Brown CV, Rhee P, et al. White blood cell and plateletcounts can be used to differentiate between infection and the normal response after splenectomy for trauma: prospective validation[J]. Trauma, 2005, 59(5):1076-1080.
[13] 付坤坤, 李路豪, 党晓卫. 外伤性脾破裂保脾手术方式选择与技巧[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2016, 43(10):702-705.
[14] 刘强, 李铎, 李建新, 等. 选择性脾动脉栓塞与脾修补术治疗外伤性脾破裂的比较[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2005, 11(11):752-754.
[15] 丁红健, 苏畅, 陈前, 等. 腹腔镜联合射频消融在创伤性脾破裂保脾术中的应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(7):594-596.
[16] Wah WL, Ahms KS, Brandt MM, et al. The need for early angio-embolization in blunt liver injuries[J]. J Trauma, 2002, 52(6):1097-1100.
[17] 李晴晴, 吕云福. 创伤性脾切除后血栓形成及防治的研究进展[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2015, 31(12):1143-1145.
文章导航

/