中国乳腺癌乳房重建改型手术的横断面调查
收稿日期: 2019-11-04
网络出版日期: 2022-07-27
基金资助
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1311004);上海市科学技术委员会优秀学术带头人计划项目(18XD1401300)
Revisonal surgery after breast reconstruction in breast cancer in China: a cross-sectional study
Received date: 2019-11-04
Online published: 2022-07-27
目的: 本研究旨在调查国内乳腺癌病人乳房重建术后改型手术的应用现状和影响因素。方法: 本研究运用横断面调查方法,向全国乳腺癌年手术量超过200例的110家医院发放问卷。问卷内容包括乳房重建术后改型手术(乳头重建、脂肪移植及对称性手术)的开展情况、手术方案选择及其影响,术后并发症发生等。结果: 110家受访医院中,96家(87.3%)已针对乳腺癌病人实施乳房重建手术,87家(79.1%)已开展乳房重建术后的改型手术。其中开展乳头重建的有55家(50.0%),脂肪移植41家(37.3%),对称性手术64家(58.2%)。同时开展2种改型手术的有31家(28.2%),3种改型手术的有21家(19.1%)。改型手术的开展与医院所在地区经济发展水平不存在明显关联。医院乳腺癌手术量越大,进行乳头重建(P=0.01)及对称性手术(P<0.01)的比例越高,≥2种改型手术的比例越大(P≤0.01)。结论: 乳腺癌乳房重建术后改型手术已在国内受到重视。其开展规模可能受到手术规模、专业培训和病人教育的影响。
吴可, 修秉虬, 郭瑢, 张琪, 李伦, 杨犇龙, 王嘉, 苏永辉, 季玮儒, 邵鼎轶, 邵志敏, 吴炅 . 中国乳腺癌乳房重建改型手术的横断面调查[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020 , 25(05) : 426 -431 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2020.05.015
Objective To investigate the application and influence factors of revisional surgery after breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients in China. Methods It is a cross-section national study by distributing questionnaires to 110 hospitals with more than 200 annual breast cancer surgeries each. The questionnaire included questions concerning the application, operative programme, influence factors and complications of revisional surgery including nipple reconstruction, fat grafting and symmetric surgery. Results A total of 96 (87.3%) in 110 hospitals had breast reconstruction and 87 (79.1%) hospitals with revisonal surgery. There was nipple reconstruction in 55 (50.0%) hospitals, fat grafting in 41 (37.3%) hospitals and symmetric surgery in 64 (58.2%) hospitals. Two types of revisonal surgery were performed in 31 (28.2%) hospitals and three types in 21 (19.1%) hospitals. The application of revisonal surgery did not have relationship significantly with local economy. There were more cases with nipple reconstruction (P=0.01) and symmetric surgery (P<0.01), as well as 2 or more than 2 types of revisonal surgery (P≤0.01) performed in hospitals which had more cases with breast cancer surgery. Conclusions Revisional surgery after breast reconstruction in breast cancer has been paid more attention in China and might be affected by the amount of breast cancer surgery in hospital, professional training and patient education.
Key words: Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Revisional surgery
| [1] | Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. |
| [2] | 修秉虬, 郭瑢, 杨犇龙, 等. 中国乳腺癌术后乳房重建手术横断面调查研究[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(7):546-551. |
| [3] | Satteson ES, Brown BJ, Nahabedian MY, et al. Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gland Surg, 2017, 6(1):4-13. |
| [4] | Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, et al. The impact of nipple reconstruction on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2012, 69(4):389-393. |
| [5] | Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, et al. Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: How does direct-to-implant measure up?[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 137(6):1690-1699. |
| [6] | Black CK, Graziano FD, Fan KL, et al. Combining abdominal flaps and implants in the breast reconstruction patient: a systematic and retrospective review of complications and outcomes[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(3):495e-503e. |
| [7] | Kling RE, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, et al. Trends in autologous fat grafting to the breast: a national survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 132(1):35-46. |
| [8] | Orr JP, Sergesketter AR, Shammas RL, et al. Assessing the relationship between anxiety and revision surgery following autologous breast reconstruction[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 144(1):24-33. |
| [9] | Hurley CM, McArdle A, Joyce KM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate nipple reconstruction during autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: a review of patient satisfaction[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2018, 45(6):534-541. |
| [10] | 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中国医师协会外科医师分会乳腺外科医师专委会. 乳腺肿瘤整形与乳房重建专家共识[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2018, 28(6):439-480. |
| [11] | Cogliandro A, Barone M, Tenna S, et al. The role of lipofilling after breast reconstruction: evaluation of outcomes and patient satisfaction with BREAST-Q[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2017, 41(6):1325-1331. |
| [12] | Pearl RA, Leedham SJ, Pacifico MD. The safety of auto-logous fat transfer in breast cancer: lessons from stem cell biology[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2012, 65(3):283-288. |
| [13] | Petit JY, Botteri E, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Locoregional recurrence risk after lipofilling in breast cancer patients[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23(3):582-588. |
| [14] | Mycckatyn TM, Wagner IJ, Mehrara BJ, et al. Cancer risk after fat transfer: a multicenter case-cohort study[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 139(1):11-18. |
| [15] | Yip JM, Watson DI, Tiggemann M, et al. Determinants of breast reconstruction outcome: how important is volume symmetry?[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2015, 68(5):679-685. |
| [16] | Razdan SN, Panchal H, Albornoz CR, et al. Impact of contralateral symmetry procedures on long-term patient-reported outcomes following unilateral prosthetic breast reconstruction[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2019, 35(2):124-128. |
| [17] | Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M, et al. The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2014, 41(5):535-541. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |