老年原发性腹膜后软组织肉瘤病人手术治疗安全性分析的回顾性队列研究
收稿日期: 2022-10-08
网络出版日期: 2023-01-30
Safety analysis on surgical treatment of elderly patients with primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study
Received date: 2022-10-08
Online published: 2023-01-30
目的: 对老年病人手术切除原发性腹膜后软组织肉瘤(retroperitoneal sarcoma, RPS),分析术后并发症发生的危险因素。方法: 回顾性队列研究2009年7月至2020年12月中山医院软组织肉瘤多学科团队手术切除老年病人的原发性RPS。使用Logistic回归分析寻找术后并发症发生的危险因素。结果: 入组98例,男54例,女44例,26例(26.5%)年龄≥70岁。术后5年总生存率为61.2%(60例)(95%CI:49.1~73.7)。78例(79.6%)肿瘤负荷>10 cm,87例(88.8%)肿瘤为单病灶。其中高分化脂肪肉瘤35例(35.7%),去分化脂肪肉瘤31例(31.6%),平滑肌肉瘤15例(15.3%)。96例(98.0%)病人为根治性手术切除,54例(55.1%)病人联合脏器切除数>1个。总体55例(56.1%)发生术后并发症,16例(16.3%)发生严重并发症。4例(4.1%)术后死亡。多因素分析提示肿瘤负荷≥10 cm(OR=4.597,P=0.012)及联合脏器切除数>1个(OR=4.858,P=0.003)是老年RPS病人发生术后并发症的独立危险因素。结论: 手术仍是原发性RPS老年病人的首选治疗方式,但应在高流量医院开展。
庄奥博, 童汉兴, 张勇, 陆维祺, 周宇红, 闾晨涛 . 老年原发性腹膜后软组织肉瘤病人手术治疗安全性分析的回顾性队列研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2022 , 27(06) : 534 -539 . DOI: 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2022.06.011
Objective: To analyze the risk factors for postoperative complications of the elderly patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed for elderly patients with primary RPS treated by soft tissue sarcoma multidisciplinary team Zhongshan Hospital from July 2009 to December 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to find risk factors for postoperative complications. Results: A total of 98 cases were enrolled including male 54 cases and female 44 cases with 26 cases (26.5%) of age 70 years or older. Five-year overall survival following surgery was 61.2% (60 cases with 95% confidence interval, 49.1-73.7). Seventy-eight cases (79.6%) had tumor burden greater than 10 cm, and 87 cases (88.8%) with single lesion. There were 35 cases (35.7%) with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 31 cases (31.6%) with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and 15 cases (15.3%) with leiomyosarcoma. A total of 96 cases(98.0%) underwent radical resection and 54 cases (55.1%) had more than one organ resected. The postoperative complications were found 55 cases (56.1%) and severe complications 16 cases (16.3%). Four cases (4.1%) died postoperatively. It was shown by multivariate analysis that both tumor burden greater than 10 cm (OR=4.597, P=0.012) and more than one organ resected (OR=4.858, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in elderly patients with RPS. Conclusions: Operative treatment remained the preferred type for elderly cases with primary RPS and the surgery should be completed in high-flow centers of RPS.
Key words: Retroperitoneal sarcoma; Surgery; Elderly; Surgical safety; Complication
| [1] | Macneill AJ, Gronchi A, Miceli R, et al. Postoperative morbidity after radical resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a report from the Transatlantic RPS Working Group[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(5):959-964. |
| [2] | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2021[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(1):7-33. |
| [3] | Swallow CJ, Strauss DC, Bonvalot S, et al. Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: an updated consensus approach from the Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(12):7873-7888. |
| [4] | 童玉芬. 中国人口的最新动态与趋势 ——结合第七次全国人口普查数据的分析[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2021, 35(4):15-25. |
| [5] | Zhuang A, Zhuang A, Wu Q, et al. Prognostic factor analysis and nomogram construction of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a review of 10 years of treatment experience in a single Asian cohort of 211 cases[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11:777647. |
| [6] | Bonvalot S, Miceli R, Berselli M, et al. Aggressive surgery in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma carried out at high-volume centers is safe and is associated with improved local control[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(6):1507-1514. |
| [7] | Bonvalot S, Roland C, Raut C, et al. Histology-tailored multidisciplinary management of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022, S0748-7983(22)00435-8. |
| [8] | Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R, et al. Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS): a report on 1007 patients from the multi-institutional collaborative RPS Working Group[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(5):1002-1009. |
| [9] | Judge SJ, Lata-Arias K, Yanagisawa M, et al. Morbidity, mortality and temporal trends in the surgical management of retroperitoneal sarcoma: an ACS-NSQIP follow up analysis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 120(4):753-760. |
| [10] | Fiore M, Brunelli C, Miceli R, et al. A prospective observational study of multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma: clinical and patient-reported outcomes 1 year after surgery[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(7):3904-3916. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |