语用学事业:哲学、文化与认知视野

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.06.008

当代外语研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 54-58.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.06.008

语用学事业:哲学、文化与认知视野

文旭

西南大学,重庆,400715

出版日期:2014-06-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:文旭,西南大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为认知语言学、语用学、语义与句法的界面研究、学习科学及外语教育。电子邮箱:xuwen@swu.edu.cn

Pragmatics Enterprise: Philosophical, Cultural, and Cognitive Perspectives

WEN Xu

Online:2014-06-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 语用学是当代语言学研究中最热门的话题之一,在过去的40多年里,它以迅猛的速度发展,取得了辉煌的成就,从言语行为理论到会话含意理论,从关联理论到认知语用学的诞生,标示着语用学在不断向前迈进。本文从哲学、文化、认知的视野,阐释了语用学的三大领域,即哲学语用学、文化语用学以及认知语用学。语用学事业的未来发展必将是这三大领域的融合。此外,研究方法和技术的革新必将给语用学研究带来新的希望。

关键词: 语用学事业, 哲学语用学, 文化语用学, 认知语用学

Abstract: Pragmatics, as one of the hottest topics in modern linguistics, has made great achievements over the past 40 years. From speech act theory to conversational implicatur theory, and from Relevance theory to cognitive pragmatics, pragmatics proves to be moving forward at fast speed. This paper, from philosophical, cultural, and cognitive perspectives, has explicated the three major fields of pragmatics, i.e. philosophical pragamtics, cultural pragmatics, and cognitive pragmatics. The integration of the three fields is to be the new direction of pragmatics erterprise in the near future. In addition, the innovations of research methods and technology will definitely bring new hopes to pragmatic investigations.

中图分类号:

H030

文旭. 语用学事业:哲学、文化与认知视野[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(06): 54-58.

WEN Xu. Pragmatics Enterprise: Philosophical, Cultural, and Cognitive Perspectives[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(06): 54-58.

参考文献

Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents [M]. London: Routledge.
Ariel, M. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach [J]. Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 3-42.
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Blakemore, D. 1988. The organization of discourse [A]. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 229-49.
Blum-Kulka, S. et al. (eds.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies [C]. Norwood: Ablex.
Brgger, F. C.1992. Culture, Language, Text: Cultural Studies within the Study of English as a Foreign Language [M]. Oslo: Scandi-navian University Press.
Carston, R. 1988. Language and cognition [A]. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 38-68.
Carroll, D. W. 1986. Psychology of Language [M]. Monterey: Boobs/Cole.
Clark, H. H. 1979. Responding to indirect acts [J]. Cognitive Psychology 11: 430-77.
Gardner, H. et al. 1983. Missing the point: The role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials [A]. In E. Perecman (ed.). Cognitive Processing in the Right Hemisphere [C]. New York: Academic Press.
Groefsema, M. 1995. Can, may, must and should: A relevance theoretic account [J]. Journal of Linguistics 31(1): 53-79.
Kasher, A. (ed.). 1989. Cognitive Aspect of Language Use [M]. New York: Elsevier.
Kempson. R. M. 1986. Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction [A]. In C. Travis (ed.). Meaning and Interpretation [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 77-103.
Kempson. R. M. (ed.). 1988a. Mental Representation [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kempson. R. M. 1988b. Grammar and conversational principle [A]. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 139-63.
Oleksy, W. (ed.). 1989. Contrastive Pragmatics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Panther, K. U. & L. L. Thornburg (eds.). 2003. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sapir, E. 2002. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Wierzbicka, A. 2003. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction (2nd ed.) [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
阿佩尔.1992.哲学的转变(胡万福译)[M].北京:光明日报出版社.
何兆熊.2000.新编语用学概要[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
何自然、冉永平.2001.语用与认知[C].北京:外语教学与研究出版社.
路德维希·维特根斯坦.1996.哲学研究(李步楼译)[M].北京:商务印书馆.
托马斯·库恩.2003.科学革命的结构(金吾伦、胡新和译)[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
文旭.2004a.反讽话语的认知语用研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.
文旭.2004b.话语理解的语用学[M].成都:四川辞书出版社.
熊学亮.1999.认知语用学概论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
姚亚平.1995.人际交往的文化冲突[A].邵敬敏.文化语言学中国潮[C].北京:语文出版社.221-32.

[1]	范振强. 新认知语用学视域下同语的语境效果和生成动因[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 12-16.
[2]	郑延国;. 冬收斋中别有情怀——我心目中的钱冠连[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(06): 10-11.
[3]	钱冠连;. 思在昆仑山下——眼光与定力[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(10): 1-4.

语用学事业:哲学、文化与认知视野

Pragmatics Enterprise: Philosophical, Cultural, and Cognitive Perspectives

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价