中国大学生语料库辅助外语写作态度调查

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.04.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究对中国大学外语学习者进行了语料库辅助外语写作的培训,并就学习者对这一写作手段的态度进行了调查。研究结果显示,中国学习者对外语写作中使用语料库持积极态度,也愿意在今后写作中使用语料库;学习者认为,语料库检索技术简单易学,语料库在词汇用法等方面对外语写作有帮助;对于学习者而言,最大的困难是检索后返回的索引行结果过多,从而给学习者分析索引行数据造成一定困难。本研究结果对外语写作教与学有一定实际指导意义。

关键词: 语料库, 外语写作, 调查, 中国大学学习者

Abstract: This study reports a survey of Chinese tertiary-level students’ attitudes toward corpus use in EFL writing after a foreign language writing course. The results showed that the Chinese learners were positive toward corpus use in foreign language writing and they would like to use corpus for foreign language writing in the future. The learners held that the corpus concordancing techniques were easy to learn and they were of help to vocabulary learning. However, the learners found that it would be difficult for them to analyze the data if the returned concordance lines were large in number. This study is the first research at home that investigates the learners’ attitudes toward corpus use in foreign language writing. The findings are significant in that it provides practical guidelines for the teaching and learning of foreign language writing.

中图分类号:

H319

张英, 雷蕾. 中国大学生语料库辅助外语写作态度调查[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(4): 49-53.

ZHANG Ying, LEI Lei. Attitudes toward Corpus Use in Foreign Language Writing: A Survey of Chinese Tertiary Level Students[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(4): 49-53.

参考文献

Boulton, A. 2010. Learning outcomes from corpus consultation [A]. In F. S. Valverde, M. M. Jaén & M. C. Pérez (eds.). Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-Based Language Teaching [C]. London: Equinox. 129-44.
Braun, S. 2007. Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora [J] . RECALL 19(3): 307-28.
Charles, M. 2014. Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora [J]. English for Specific Purposes 35(1): 30-40.Cobb, T. 1997. Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? [J]. System 25(3): 301-15.
Conrad, S. 2000. Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? [J]. TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 548-60.
Davies, M. 2004. Student use of large, annotated corpora to analyze syntactic variation [A]. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini & D. Stewart (eds.). Corpora and Language Learners [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 245-70.
Flowerdew, L. 2010. Using corpora for writing instruction [A]. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics [C]. London: Routledge. 444-57.
Gledhill, C. 2000. The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions [J]. English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 115-35.
Hyland, K. 2002. Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing [A]. In J. Flowerdew (ed.). Academic Discourse [C]. Harlow: Longman. 115-30.
Jabbour, G. 2001. Lexis and grammar in second language reading and writing [A]. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (eds.). Linking Literacies: Perspectives on L2 Reading-writing Connections [C]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 291-308.
Johns, T. 1991. Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials [J]. English Language Research Journal 4(1): 1-16.
Kennedy, C. & T. Miceli. 2001. An evaluation of intermediate students’ approaches to corpus investigation [J]. Language Learning & Technology 5(3): 77-90.
Kennedy, C. & T. Miceli. 2010. Corpus-assisted creative writing: Introducing intermediate Italian learners to a corpus as a reference resource [J]. Language Learning & Technology 14(1): 28-44.
Stevens, V. 1995. Concordancing with language learners: Why? When? What? [J]. CAELL Journal 6(2): 2-10.
Sun, Y. C. 2000. Using on-line corpus to facilitate language learning [R]. British Columbia, Canada: Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Thurston, J. & C. N.Candlin. 1998. Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English [J]. English for Specific Purposes 17(3): 267-80.
Tribble, C. 2002. Corpora and corpus analysis: New windows on academic writing [A]. In J. Flowerdew (ed.). Academic Discourse [C] . Harlow: Longman. 131-49.
Yoon, H. 2008. More than a linguistic reference: The influence of corpus technology on L2 academic writing [J]. Language Learning & Technology 12(2): 31-48.
Yoon, H. & A. Hirvela. 2004. ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 13(4): 257-83.

[1]	张瑞华, 李顺然. 国内基于语料库的批评话语分析研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 101-110.
[2]	张乐, 刘芹. 中国理工科大学生英语求职信中的短语特征[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 111-120.
[3]	翁义明, 王金平. 文学语篇机器翻译的特征与局限——汉语流水句人机英译对比研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 128-137.
[4]	甄凤超. 语料库语言学研究热点追踪与思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 89-100.
[5]	尚文博. 基于语料库的英汉学术翻译文本逻辑关系的显化特征——以Handbook of Social Justice in Education的翻译为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 449(5): 110-120.
[6]	王靓婧, 潘璠. 新一代可视化语料库软件#LancsBox的核心功能和应用前景[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 449(5): 77-90.
[7]	顾勤, 王泰蓉, 陈荔萍, 吴舒窈, 沈祎,. 社区老年女性糖尿病患者尿路感染常见病原菌调查[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(05): 538-542.
[8]	娄宝翠, 王亚丽. 学习者英语学术写作介入标记语使用特征[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(04): 58-69.
[9]	王琦. “一带一路”英文媒体中的中国企业形象——语料库辅助下的批评话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(03): 99-113.
[10]	肖志清, 邵斌. 基于语料库的“绿水青山就是金山银山”的英译探析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 95-104.
[11]	周志莲, 刘绍忠. 基于可比语料库的英译改译[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 83-94.
[12]	张雪珍, 苏坤. 基于语料库的《纽约时报》涉华、涉日报道议程设置对比分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 118-125.
[13]	姜晓星, 徐培青, 丁磊, 倪培华, 王学锋,. 医学检验专业本科毕业生质量调查与分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(01): 117-119.
[14]	甄凤超. 语料库语言学在变化中的坚守[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(05): 73-80.
[15]	冯莉, 严明. 面向英语教师的《中国英语能力等级量表》应用可行性调查——问题与对策[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(05): 50-56.