“起承转合”之起承转合——对比修辞视阈下汉语篇章模式研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.04.005

当代外语研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04): 18-22.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.04.005

“起承转合”之起承转合——对比修辞视阈下汉语篇章模式研究

刘立新, 杨玉晨

东北师范大学,长春,130117

出版日期:2014-04-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:刘立新,东北师范大学外国语学院讲师。主要研究方向为语篇分析、二语写作。电子邮箱:liulx320@nenu.edu.cn; 杨玉晨,东北师范大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为语篇分析、二语写作。
基金资助:
*国家社科基金项目“英汉最小篇章模式对比研究”(编号10BYY006)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“汉语‘起承转合’篇章模式对中国学生英语写作的影响”(编号13QN036)的阶段性成果。

A Critical Review of “qi-cheng-zhuan-he” within the Field of Contrastive Rhetoric

LIU Lixin, YANG Yuchen

Online:2014-04-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究系统梳理了对比修辞领域内对汉语基本篇章模式“起承转合”的研究,发现学界内对“起承转合”结构的认知本身也呈现了起承转合式的发展脉络,即从最初西方学者眼中的“异类”并对中国学生英语写作产生负面影响到与英语最小篇章模式的异形同构。最后,为了更加系统地进行英汉篇章模式对比研究,作者指出基于自建小型语料库和不同体裁的研究是必要的。

关键词: 起承转合, 对比修辞, 英语写作

Abstract: This paper systematically reviews the studies of “qi-cheng-zhuan-he” within the field of contrastive rhetoric, finding that the insights so far obtained have experienced a spiral progression. The typical Chinese textual pattern was initially rejected by western scholars as being dramatically different from “directness” in English, thus having negatively affected the English writing of Chinese students. However, as more recent research findings indicate, “qi-cheng-zhuan-he” has been found to be similar to the deep structure of problem-solution pattern in English. Finally, it is pointed out that description of the pattern based on self-built corpus and across genres is necessary before systematic contrastive study is conducted.

中图分类号:

刘立新, 杨玉晨. “起承转合”之起承转合——对比修辞视阈下汉语篇章模式研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(04): 18-22.

LIU Lixin, YANG Yuchen. A Critical Review of “qi-cheng-zhuan-he” within the Field of Contrastive Rhetoric[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(04): 18-22.

参考文献

Cai, G. 1993. Beyond Bad Writing: Teaching English Composition to Chinese ESL Students [R]. San Diego, CA: Annual Convention of the Conference on College Composition and Communication.
Cahill, D. 2009. Contrastive Rhetoric: Orientalism and the Chinese Second Language Writer [M]. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
Chen, W. C. 2007. Some literature review on the comparison of the Chinese Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He writing model and the western problem-solution schema [J]. WHAMPOA-An Interdisciplinary Journal 52: 137-48.
Connor, U. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. 2002. New directions in contrastive rhetoric [J]. TESOL Quarterly (4): 493-510.
Fagan, E. R. & P. Cheong. 1987. Contrastive rhetoric: Pedagogical implications for the ESL teacher in Singapore [J]. RELC: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia 18(1): 19-31.
Hoey, M. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse [M]. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kaplan, R. B. 1966. Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education [J]. Language Learning 16: 1-20.
Kirkpatrick, A. 1997. Traditional Chinese text structures and their influence on the writing in Chinese and English of contemporary mainland Chinese students [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 6(3): 223-44.
Liu, Y. 1996. To capture the essence of Chinese rhetoric: An anatomy of a paradigm in comparative rhetoric [J]. Rhetoric Review 14(2): 318-35.
Malcolm, I. & H. Pan. 1989. Argumentation patterns in contemporary Chinese: Implications for English teaching [A]. In V. Bickley (ed.). Language Teaching and Learning Styles across Cultures [C]. Hong Kong: Institute of Language Education. 321-33.
Matsuda, P. K. 1997. Contrastive rhetoric in context: A dynamic model of L2 writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 45-60.
McCarthy, M. 1991/2002. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press./Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Mohan, B. A. & W. A.-Y. Lo. 1985. Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors [J]. TESOL Quarterly 19(3): 515-34.
Scollon, R. & S. Scollon. 1997. Point of view and citation: Fourteen Chinese and English versions of the “same” news story [J]. Text (17): 83-125.
Tsao, F.-F. 1983. Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: English and Mandarin [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (3): 99-117.
You, X. 2005. Conflation of rhetorical traditions: The formation of modern Chinese writing instruction [J]. Rhetoric Review (2): 150-69.
Yang, Y. C. & Z. Yang. 2010. Problem-solution in English vs. Qi-Cheng-Zhuan-He in Chinese: Are they compatible discourse patterns? [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (5): 65-77.
蔡基刚.2003.英汉写作修辞对比(第二版)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.
黄强.2010.论起承转合[J].晋阳学刊(3):124-29.
霍四通.2009.篇章层面的汉英对比修辞研究三题[A].陈汝东.修辞学论文集[C].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社.
姜望琪.2010.中国语言研究传统与语篇语义学[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)(2):97-102.
蒋寅.1998.起承转合:机械结构论的消长——兼论八股文法与诗学的关系[J].文学遗产(3):65-75.
金春岚.2013.“起承转合”与西方语篇模式理论[J].当代修辞学(2):68-74.
金克木.1994.八股新论[A].启功、张中行、金克木.说八股[C].北京:中华书局.
聂仁发.2009.汉语语篇研究回顾与展望[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版)22(3):40-45.
马洵.2001.起承转合的典范——赏析林肯的葛底斯堡演说[J].天津外国语学院学报8(3):46-48.
启功.1997.有关文言文中的一些现象——困难和设想[A].汉语现象论丛[C].北京:中华书局.
王凯符.1991.八股文概说[M].北京:中国和平出版社.
吴应天.1989.文章结构学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.
吴正岚.2003.宋代诗歌章法理论与和“起承转合”的形成[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)40(2):114-20.

[1]	张荔;. 学术英语写作课程设计与评估——基于留美中国学生的证据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(03): 17-22+47+107.
[2]	刘兴华;纪小凌;余继英;. 以评促学——大学英语写作有效同伴反馈模式构建及促学效果研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(05): 9-15+109.
[3]	滕延江;Peter De Costa;. 学术英语写作与国际发表中的JARS要领与4C原则——Peter De Costa博士访谈[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(05): 48-53.
[4]	滕延江. 活动理论视角下的学术英语写作“四位一体”教学范式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 53-58.
[5]	张乐, 刘芹. 中国理工科大学生英语写作语料库的设计、构建与前景[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 80-83.
[6]	杨永林. 经典与新锐辉映,理论与应用齐飞——英语写作要加强“一体化”与“本体化”研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(02): 3-7.
[7]	陆元雯;. 大学英语写作与大学英语和通识教育的关系研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(03): 31-33+39+93.
[8]	滕延江;. “学术读写素养”范式与学术英语写作课程设计[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(01): 41-47.
[9]	王露芳;. 在线写作自动评改系统在高职英语写作教学中的反馈效度研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(01): 53-56.
[10]	吴炜. 纠错反馈策略与语言错误类型对学生纠错质量的交互影响[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 47-52.
[11]	龚嵘;. 大学学术英语写作教学的社会文化探究——学习者身份建构视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(06): 34-39.
[12]	胡茶娟. 对非英语专业大学生英语写作中词块运用的个案跟踪研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(08): 41-45.
[13]	龚嵘, 吴承钧. 研究型高校本科生EAP写作教学设计案例——关注大学教师教学设计能力的触发机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(08): 35-39.
[14]	张柏然;. 从“心中有而笔下无”说开去——《朗文英语写作活用辞典》序[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(10): 0-.
[15]	杨永林;. 写作教学,十大视角——从经典修辞学到数字化写作[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(03): 131-136+162.

“起承转合”之起承转合——对比修辞视阈下汉语篇章模式研究

A Critical Review of “qi-cheng-zhuan-he” within the Field of Contrastive Rhetoric

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价