隐喻的“两只眼”——概念隐喻与语法隐喻之融合与互补

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.09.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 隐喻作为人类的基本认知方式,是通向人类思维的窗口,体现于语言、手势、图片等多种模态。本文简要回顾了概念隐喻和语法隐喻的基本理论思路和框架,分析了两者在概念功能及形成机制上的融合,在体现形式上的互补以及语法隐喻作为概念隐喻的内驱力。发现隐喻的“两只眼”——概念隐喻与语法隐喻的这些融合与互补对经验的解释和意义的构建有着重要的作用。

关键词: 认知语言学, 功能语言学, 概念隐喻, 语法隐喻

Abstract: As human being's basic cognitive way, metaphor is a window to human thought. It is realized in language, gesture, pictures and other modes. This paper briefly reviewed the fundamental theoretical thinking as well as framework. Then I analyzed their integration at the level of conceptual functions and generating mechanisms, their complementarities at the level of realization forms and the inner drive of grammatical metaphor for the conceptual metaphor to some extent. It was found that those integration and complementarities of conceptual metaphor and grammatical metaphor, the “two eyes” of metaphor, are of great significance in construing experience and constructing meaning.

中图分类号:

王容花. 隐喻的“两只眼”——概念隐喻与语法隐喻之融合与互补[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(09): 36-41.

WANG Ronghua. The “Two Eyes” of Metaphor: Integration and Complement of Conceptual Metaphor and Grammatical Metaphor[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 36-41.

参考文献

Ching, M. K. L., M. C. Halley & R. F. Lunsford. 1980. Linguistic Perspective on Literature [M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cienki, A. & C. Müller. 2008. Metaphor and Gesture [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Forceville C. & E. Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal Metaphor [M]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goatly, A. 2007. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985/1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1992. How do you mean [A]? In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (eds.). Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice [C]. London & New York: Pinter. 20-37.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1995. Language and the reshaping of human experience [A]. In B. Dendrinos (ed.). Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Critical Discourse Analysis [C]. Athens: University of Athens Press. 1247-76.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. Things and relations: Regrammatizing experience as technical knowledge [A]. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (eds.). Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science [C]. London: Routledge. 185-235.
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London & New York: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold.
Hawkes, T. 1980. Metaphor [M]. New York: Methuen.
Holme, R. 2003. Grammatical metaphor as a cognitive construct [A]. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (eds.). Grammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 391-415.
Koller, V. 2003. Metaphor clusters, metaphor chains: Analyzing the multifunctionality of metaphor in text [J]. Metaphorik. de 5: 115-34.
Koller V. & P. Davidson. 2008. Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: A cross-genre study of British policy-making [J]. Discourse & Society 19(3): 307-31.
Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.) [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-51.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1): Theoretical Prerequisites [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics (Vol. 2): Descriptive Application [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mandela, N. 1995. Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela [M]. London: Abacus.
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. 2008. Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying ‘nominalization' [J]. Discourse and Society 19(6): 801-10.
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ornoty, A. (ed.). 1979/1993. Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ungerer, F. & H. Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Addison Wesley: Longman.
郭鸿.2008.现代西方符号学纲要[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.
何中清.2013.语法隐喻中的映射和整合[J].当代外语研究(11):9-14.
江桂英、王容花.2013.英语演讲中言语-手势多模态隐喻的融合研究[J].外语研究(5):9-16.
严世清.2003.语法隐喻理论的发展及其理论意义[J].外国语(3):51-57.

[1]	邹君, 成晓光, 于林龙. 体验哲学视阈下概念隐喻的文化模式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 119-128.
[2]	李战子. 新媒体素养:内涵和演变——兼论对功能语言学话语分析的新挑战[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 13-20.
[3]	田秘, 赵永峰. 概念整合理论的批评认知语言学阐释——以“the *ly challenged”委婉构式为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[4]	胡壮麟. 后韩礼德时代功能语言学的发展趋势[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 44-53.
[5]	毛继光;刘雅芳;. “抓手”与“玩转”——乔姆斯基再诠释“恐怖主义”[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 93-104.
[6]	严世清. 汉语失语症的系统功能语言学描述与阐述:一个案例报告[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(03): 70-79.
[7]	范振强, 郭雅欣. 交互主观性视域下概念隐喻的认知语用机制新解[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 70-82.
[8]	王寅. 像似性十辩——体认语言学的像似观新解[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 57-66.
[9]	钟安林;. 认知视角下《六祖坛经》中的比喻分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(03): 100-104.
[10]	韩艳方;陈令君;. 及物性系统与中国形象建构——基于语料库的中西方“中国梦”新闻语篇研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(01): 19-30.
[11]	任凯, 王振华. 系统功能语言学视角下的英汉情态对比研究——以政治新闻语篇为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(02): 20-26.
[12]	杨永林. 经典与新锐辉映,理论与应用齐飞——英语写作要加强“一体化”与“本体化”研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(02): 3-7.
[13]	钟书能, 刘爽. 虚拟位移的语法构式特征研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(01): 51-56.
[14]	范莉;. 语言与思维:在语言发展的过程中[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 6-15.
[15]	尤泽顺;. 语言与社会互动:从语言相对论到批评话语分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 24-31.