汉语归附小句在翻译中的及物性转换

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.02.003

当代外语研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02): 8-12.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.02.003

汉语归附小句在翻译中的及物性转换

赵晶

北京科技大学,北京,100083

出版日期:2015-02-28 发布日期:2020-07-25
作者简介:赵晶,北京科技大学外国语学院讲师。主要研究方向为英汉对比与翻译、功能语言学。电子邮箱:gospelrui@acmilan.com.cn

Transitivity Shifts of Chinese Ascriptive Clauses in Translation

ZHAO Jing

Online:2015-02-28 Published:2020-07-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 系统功能语言学框架下的汉语归附小句指没有系动词或相应动词成分的关系过程小句,可进一步分为形容词谓语式、体词谓语式和主谓谓语式三类。本文关注归附小句的特点以及翻译中所带来的小句及物性的转换,包括及物性过程的变更、删减、及物性等级的高低变化以及及物性的隐喻式表达等。这些变化有的是语言系统中句法结构本身的要求,有的是因为语言成分性质的不同,有的则是谋篇布局、优化语篇的需要。不同语言识解经验的方式存在差异,这种差异在翻译中重构经验意义时便体现为不同的及物性,因此经验功能的对等并不一定意味着及物性的匹配,翻译要符合译语语言识解世界经验的特点。

关键词: 归附小句, 关系小句, 及物性翻译转换

Abstract: In systemic functional linguistics, Chinese ascriptive clause refers to a kind of relational clause without a verbal phrase. It could be further divided into three types: the one with nominal as predicate, with adjective as predicate, and with subject-predicate phrase as predicate. This paper is mainly concerned with the features of Chinese ascriptive clauses and the transitivity shifts caused during the process of translation, including process type shifts, process deletion, transitivity scale moderation and the employment of metaphorical transitivity expressions. Those shifts are caused by either language structure, or distinctive status of nominals and adjectives in Chinese and English, or the need to optimize discourse. Languages have different ways of construing experience. The transference of experiential function does not guarantee the matching of transitivity types. Translation should conform to the features of construing experience in the target language.

中图分类号:

H059

赵晶. 汉语归附小句在翻译中的及物性转换[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(02): 8-12.

ZHAO Jing. Transitivity Shifts of Chinese Ascriptive Clauses in Translation[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(02): 8-12.

参考文献

Bell, R. T. 1991. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice [M]. London & New York:Caffarel, A., J.R. Martin & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (eds.). 2004. Language Typology: A Functional Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Calzada Pérez, M. 2007. Transitivity in Translating. The Interdependence of Texture and Context [M]. Bern: Peter Lang.
Guerrero-Medina, P. 2003. Cardinal transitivity in foregrounded discourse [A]. In C. S. Butler, M. A. Gómez-González & S. M. Doval-Suárez (eds.). The Dynamics of Language Use: Functional and Contrastive Perspectives [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 349-69.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & E. McDonald. 2004. Metafunctional profile of the grammar of Chinese [A]. In A. Caffarel et al. (eds.). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 305-96.
Hopper, P.J. & S.A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse [J]. Language 56(2) : 251-99.
Li, Eden Sum-hung. 2007. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese—A Text-Based Analysis [M]. London & New York: Continuum.
Long, Rijin. 1981. Transitivity in Chinese [D]. University of Sydney: M.A. Hons.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2001. The environments of translation [A]. In E. Steiner & C. Yallop (eds.). Exploring Translation and Multilingual Text Production: Beyond Content [C]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 41-126.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., K. Teruya & M. Lam. 2010. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics [M]. London New York: Continuum.
程晓堂.2002.关于及物性系统中关系过程的两点存疑[J].现代外语(3):311-17.
陆俭明.2005.现代汉语语法研究教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
周晓康.1999.现代汉语物质过程小句的及物性系统[J].当代语言学(3):36-50.

汉语归附小句在翻译中的及物性转换

Transitivity Shifts of Chinese Ascriptive Clauses in Translation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价