网络语境下不礼貌语用与身份建构分析——以微博研究为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.05.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不礼貌是日常人际交往的常见现象,其具有一定的语用理据。通过分析微博交际中的不礼貌用语,本文以身份为切入点界定不礼貌的本质,讨论其语用功能和人际语用效应;然后将不礼貌语用事件分为前、中、后三阶段,分析身份属性如何贯穿不礼貌的起承转合,重点探讨微博语境下不礼貌交际的发展与交际者身份属性的建构与协商,从而加深对不礼貌本质及其策略性功用的理解,以促进不礼貌理论的发展。

关键词: 不礼貌, 身份建构, 网络语用

Abstract: Impoliteness is pragmatically rooted in interpersonal interaction. On the basis of identity analysis and with reference to data collected from Weibo, this paper explores pragmatic functions together with interpersonal pragmatic effects of impoliteness; then it divides the development of impoliteness into three sections and analyzes the correlation between identity construction and how impoliteness is triggered, conveyed, received, controlled, countered, managed and resolved. Special attention is paid to research into how participants manipulate and exploit impoliteness offensively and defensively in instances of Weiboing as well as identity construction and negotiation of interactants. A better understanding of impoliteness and its pragmatic functions will hopefully promote the development of impoliteness theories and cyber-pragmatics.

中图分类号:

张玮, 谢朝群. 网络语境下不礼貌语用与身份建构分析——以微博研究为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(5): 23-28.

ZHANG Wei, XIE Chaoqun. A Pragmatic Approach to Impoliteness and Identity Construction in Cyber-context: A Case Analysis of Weibo[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(5): 23-28.

参考文献

Beebe, L. M. 1995. Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence [A]. In J. E. Alatis, C. A. Straehle, B. Gallenberger & M. Ronkin (eds.). Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects [C]. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press. 154-68.
Bousfield, D. 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2185-2216.
Bousfield, D. 2008 Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brewer, B. & W. Gardner. 1996. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 83.
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (Vol. 4) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, J. & E. Stets. 2009. Identity Theory [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, J. D., S. Assanand & A. Di Paula. 2000. Structural features of the self-concept and adjustment [A]. In A. Tesser, R. B. Felson & J. M. Suls (eds.). Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity [C]. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 67-87.
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349-67.
Culpeper, J. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 35-72.
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J., D. Bousfield & A. Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10): 1545-79.
De Fina, A., D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg. 2006. Discourse and Identity [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eelen, G. 1999. Politeness and ideology: A critical review [J]. Pragmatics 9(1): 163-73.
Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories [M]. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Fraser, B. 1975. Warning and threatening [J]. Centrum 3(2): 169-80.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1-33.
Georgakopoulou, A. 2013. Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 55-74.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual [M]. Chicago: Aldine.
Graham, S. L. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im) politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4): 742-59.
Hecht, M., J. R. Warren, E. Jung & J. Krieger. 2005. The communication theory of identity [A]. In W. B. Gudykunst (ed.). Theorizing about Intercultural Communication [C]. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 257-78.
Herring, S. 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives [M]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Holmes, J. 1984. Modifying illocutionary force [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 8(3): 345-65.
Holmes, J., M. Meredith & S. Schnurr. 2008. Impoliteness and ethnicity: Māori and Pākehā discourse in New Zealand workplaces [J]. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4(2): 193-219.
Jay, T. 1992. Cursing in America: A Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards, and on the Streets [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jay, T. 1999. Why We Curse: A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kasper, G. 1990. Linguistic politeness: Current research issues [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 193-218.
Kienpointner, M. 1997. Varieties of rudeness: Types and functions of impolite utterances [J]. Functions of Language 4(2): 251-87.
Lachenicht, L. G. 1980. Aggravating language a study of abusive and insulting language [J]. Research on Language & Social Interaction 13(4): 607-87.
Lakoff, R. T. 1989. The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse [J]. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 8(2-3): 101-30.
Leech, G. N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics (Vol. 285) [M]. London: Longman.
Locher, M. A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication (Vol. 12) [M]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Locher, M. & D. Bousfield. 2008. Impoliteness and Power in Language [A]. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (eds.). Impoliteness in Language [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-13.
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, B. 2004. Identity in Modern Society.　A Social Psychological Perspective [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis [A]. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures [C]. London & New York: Continuum. 11-46.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2005. (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 95-119.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 4(39): 639-56.
Stryker, S. 1987. Identity theory: Developments and extensions [A]. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (eds.). Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives [C]. New York: Wiley. 89-103.
Tajefl & Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior [A]. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (eds.). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations [C]. The Monterey: Brooks\Cole. 33-47.Thomas, J. 1986. The Dynamics of Discourse: A Pragmatic Analysis of Confrontational Interaction [D]. University of Lancaster.
Tracy, K. 1990. The many faces of facework [A]. In G. Howard & P. R. William (eds.). Handbook of Language and Social Psychology [C]. Chichester: Wiley. 209-26.
Vuchinich, S. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict [A]. In A. D. Grimshaw (ed.). Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments and Conversations [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 118-38.
Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yus, F. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context [M]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zappavigna, M. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media [M]. London/New York: Continuum.
申智奇、何自然.2010.言语冒犯及其形成机制[J].外语教学(4):11-14.

[1]	唐蕾;. 华裔获得语作家身份建构的译者行为批评分析——以李翊云《逃避之道》汉译为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 86-89+93.
[2]	田华静. 身份建构的态度资源——以《悉尼先锋晨报》的一篇新闻报道为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(6): 5-11.
[3]	龚嵘. 大学学术英语写作教学的社会文化探究——学习者身份建构视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(6): 34-39.
[4]	王雪玉. 商业广告语篇中的身份建构变迁:历史社交语用学视角[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(09): 39-43.
[5]	罗列. 译入语体的选择与现代性别身份的建构——论20世纪初叶中国女性译者的译入语体[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(08): 55-62.
[6]	章柏成. 遮蔽与突显——高校英语教师学术身份的隐喻建构[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(07): 32-39.
[7]	刘江;. 语境、形式与神话——《富兰克林自传》的叙事时间与身份建构[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(12): 50-54+60.