国内外复合词加工研究述评

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.08.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过对国内外复合词加工研究的回顾,首先梳理了该领域的几种代表性理论模型,指出其中双通道模型是更具有解释力的模型;然后基于研究方法的分类角度对现有第一语言领域和第二语言领域复合词加工的实证研究分别进行了分析和评价。最后总结了复合词加工研究的基本现状和存在问题,并预测了未来研究的方向。

关键词: 复合词加工, 分解, 双通道, 语义透明度

Abstract: This paper provides a critical review of the compound word processing research in China and abroad. It starts by introducing the representative theoretical models in the field, concluding that so far the Dual-route model is the one with the best explanatory power, and then it proceeds to make a detailed analysis and evaluation of the current empirical studies in compound word processing in both L1 and L2. At the end it predicts the future trends of the research on compound word processing.

中图分类号:

H319

赵蔚. 国内外复合词加工研究述评[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(08): 11-17.

ZHAO Wei. A Review of Compound Word Processing Research in China and Abroad[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(08): 11-17.

参考文献

Andrews, S. 1986. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (25): 726-40.
Andrews, S., B. Miller & K. Rayner. 2004. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap [J]. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (16): 285-311.
Baayen, R. H., T. Dijkstra & R. Schreuder. 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (37): 94-117.
Butterworth, B. 1983. Lexical representation [A]. In B. Butterworth (ed.). Language Production (Vol. Ⅱ: Development, Writing, and Other Language Processes) [C]. London: Academic Press. 257-94.
Caramazza, A., A. Laudanna & C. Romani. 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology [J]. Cognition (28): 297-332.
Cheng, C., M. Wang & C. A. Perfetti. 2011. Acquisition of compound words in Chinese-English bilingual children: Decomposition and cross-language activation [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics (32): 583-600.
Diependaele, K., J. A. Duñabeitia, J. Morris & E. Keuleers. 2011. Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 64: 344-58.
Dressler, W. U. 2006. Compound types [A]. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (eds.). The Representation and Processing of Compound Words [C]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 23-44.
Duñabeitia, J., P. Manuel & C. Carreiras. 2007. The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (14): 1171-76.
Fiorentino, R. & E. Fund-Reznicek. 2009. Masked morphological priming of compound constituents [J]. The Mental Lexicon (4): 159-93.
Foroodi-Nejad, F. & J. Paradis. 2009. Crosslinguistic transfer in the acquisition of compound words in Persian-English bilinguals [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (12): 411-27.
Frisson, S., R. Niswander-Klement & A. Pollatsek. 2008. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words [J]. British Journal of Psychology (99): 87-107.
Jarema, G., C. Busson, R. Nikolova, K. Tsapkini & G. Libben. 1999. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study [J]. Brain and Language (68): 362-69.
Jiang, N. & K. Forster. I. 2001. Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (44): 32-51.
Juhasz, B., M. Starr, A. W. Inhoff & L. Placke. 2003. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations [J]. British Journal of Psychology (94): 223-44.
Ko, I., M. Wang & S. Kim. 2011. Bilingual reading of compound words [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (40): 49-73.
Libben, G. 1998. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing and impairment [J]. Brian and Language (61): 30-44.
Libben, G. 2014. The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective [J]. Cognitive Neuropsychology (31): 8-25.
Libben, G., M. Gibson, Y. B. Yoon & D. Sandra. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness [J]. Brain and Language (84): 50-64.
Libben, G. & G. Jarema. 2006. The representation and processing of compound words [C]. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Liu, Y. & D. Peng. 1997. Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course [A]. In H. Chen (ed.). Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages [C]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. 219-32.
Longtin, C-M. & F. Meunier. 2005. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (53): 26-41.
MacGregor, L. J. & Y. Shtyrov. 2013. Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG [J]. Brian & Language (126): 217-29.
Marelli, M. & C. Luzzatti. 2012. Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (66): 644-64.
Mayila, Y. 2010. English Compound Word Processing: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese-English Bilinguals [D]. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
Nicoladis, E. 2002. What’s the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children’s crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns [J]. Journal of Child Language (29): 843-63.
Plaut, D. C. & L. M. Gonnerman. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (15): 445-85.
Pollatsek, A., J. Hyönä & R. Bertram. 2000. The role of constituents in reading Finnish compound words [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (26): 820-33.
Sandra, D. 1990. On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology (42): 529-67.
Schreuder, R. & R. H. Baayen. 1995. Modeling morphological processing [A]. In L. B. Feldman (ed.). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing [C]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 131-56.
Schreuder, R. & R. H. Baayen. 1997. How complex simplex words can be [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (37): 118-39.
Seidenberg, M. S. & L. M. Gonnerman. 2000. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes [J]. Trends in cognitive Sciences (4): 353-61.
Shoolman, N. & S. Andrews. 2003. Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification [A]. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Jupker (eds.). Masked Priming: The State of the Art (1st editon.) [C]. New York: Psychology Press. 241-78.
Silva, R. & H. Clahsen. 2008. Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (11): 245-60.
Taft, M. 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (9): 271-94.
Taft, M. & K. Forster. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (14): 638-47.
Taft, M. & K. Forster. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (15): 607-20.
Taft, M. & X. Zhu. 1995. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study [A]. In L. Feldman (ed.). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing [C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 293-316.
Zhang, B. & D. Peng. 1992. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon [A]. In H. Chen & O. Zheng (eds.). Language Processing in Chinese [C]. Amsterdam: North-Holland . 131-49.
Zwitserlood, P. 1994. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (9): 341-68.
陈士法.2009.英语复合词在英汉心理词典中存储单位的实验研究[J].外语教学与研究(3):211-16.
陈士法、苗兴伟、方洁.2007.英汉双语心理词典中英语单词的存储单位——一项实验研究[J].外语教学与研究(1):51-55.甘彩虹、张金桥.2012.重复启动条件下汉英双语者英语复合词的词汇通达机制[J].心理与行为研究(5):595-600.
王春茂、彭聃龄.1999.合成词加工中的词频、词素频率及语义透明度[J].心理学报(3):266-73.
药盼盼、李妮、陈宝国.2012.词根频率对汉语母语者英语屈折
词和派生词表征方式的影响[J].外语教学与研究(5):694-705.
张北镇.2014.中国英语学习者派生词加工研究[J].现代外语(2):221-30.

[1]	郭志远, 虞培祥, 欧阳华. 基于大涡模拟的圆柱绕流剪切层不稳定性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(8): 924-933.
[2]	李红光, 郭英, 眭萍, 蔡斌, 苏令华. 基于稀疏贝叶斯的多跳频信号二维波达方向估计[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 359-368.
[3]	李春祥, 张浩怡. 基于混合多变量经验模态分解和极限学习机的非平稳过程预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 376-386.
[4]	谢海润，吴亚东，欧阳华，王安正. 基于本征正交分解和动态模态分解的尾涡激振现象瞬态过程的模态分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(2): 176-185.
[5]	孙娜娜, 潘婷婷, 刘嘉琳, 瞿洪平,. 持续性炎性反应、免疫抑制-分解代谢综合征的研究进展[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2020, 15(02): 131-134.
[6]	赵京鹤;刘宏岩;胡晶;. 基于BP神经网络的超声振动钻削钻头磨损状态监测试验研究[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020, 36(02): 83-86.
[7]	张龙;蔡秉桓;吴佳敏;熊国良;. 滚动轴承故障特征自适应增强的相关峭度联合降噪方法[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020, 36(02): 62-70.
[8]	席茂松;许昕;潘宏侠;. 基于优化k值的VMD和矩阵分形的供输弹系统早期故障诊断[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2020, 36(02): 208-211+215.
[9]	张晓慧，柏君励，顾解忡，马宁. 一种不可压缩二维流动的显式逐次超松弛并行算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(6): 681-687.
[10]	杨晓建，胡晨星，竺晓程，杜朝辉. 离心压气机无叶扩压器非定常流动本征正交分解法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(12): 1450-1458.
[11]	李春祥，裴杨从琪，殷潇. 基于Hermite组合核EMD-WT-LSSVM的非平稳非高斯风压预测[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2019, 53(10): 1249-1258.
[12]	张龙;宋成洋;邹友军;崔路瑶;雷兵;. 基于VMD多特征融合与PSO-SVM的滚动轴承故障诊断[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(06): 96-104.
[13]	李东;刘广璞;黄晋英;张安安;. 基于EEMD-SVD与SVM的轴承故障诊断[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(06): 123-127.
[14]	张航;许昕;潘宏侠;梁海英;. 基于ITD与PSO-SVM的供输弹系统故障诊断[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(06): 197-200.
[15]	熊国良;毛志德;张龙;成俊良;. 经验模态分解与核马氏距离的滚动轴承性能退化评估[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019, 35(04): 96-100+104.