动态测量与二语学习研究综述

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.12.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 动态测量能跨越多个时间点观察评估学习者的进步与改变情况,了解学习者动态认知历程与认知能力变化的特点和潜能,在二语学习研究中得到认可和应用。本文基于广泛的文献阅读,对动态测量在二语学习领域的理论和实践研究进行综述和评析,以供进一步研究参考借鉴。

关键词: 动态测量, 二语学习, 形成性评估

Abstract: In dynamic assessment, important information about a learner’s abilities and changes can be learned during the assessment. Dynamic assessment is a procedure for simultaneously assessing and promoting development of learners’ cognitive procedure and ability, which is confirmed and applied in the research on second language teaching and learning. This study is a brief review and comment on the research of dynamic assessment and its application in second language learning based on a wide retrieval of literature.

中图分类号:

王华. 动态测量与二语学习研究综述[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(12): 25-30.

WANG Hua. A General Review of Dynamic Assessment and Second language Learning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(12): 25-30.

参考文献

Ableeva, R. 2008. The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension [A]. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (eds.). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages [C]. London: Equinox. 57-86.
Ableeva, R. & J. Lantolf. 2011. Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension [J]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18(2): 133-49.
Bachman, L. F. & A. D. Cohen. 1998. Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research [M]. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bavali, M., M. Yamini & F. Sadighi. 2011. Dynamic assessment in perspective: Demarcating dynamic and non-dynamic boundaries [J]. Journal of Language Teaching & Research 2(4): 895-902.
Black, P. & D. Wiliam. 2009. Developing the theory of formative assessment [J]. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability 21(1): 5-31.
Brown, A. & R. A. Ferrara. 1985. Diagnosing zones of proximal development [A]. In J.V. Wertsch (ed.). Culture, Communication and Cognition. Vygotskian Perspectives [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 273-305.
Caffrey, E., D. Fuchs & L. S. Fuchs. 2008. The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: A review [J]. Journal of Special Education 41(4):254-70.
Cheng, L. 2005. Changing Language Teaching through Language Testing: A Washback Study [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cioffi, G. & J. J. Carney. 1997. Dynamic assessment of composing abilities in children with learning disabilities [J]. Educational Assessment 4: 175-202.
Dorfler, T., S. Golke & C. Artelt. 2009. Dynamic assessment and its potential for the assessment of reading competence [J]. Studies in Educational Evaluation 35: 77-82.
Grigorenko, E. L. & R. J. Sternberg. 1998. Dynamic testing [J]. Psychological Bulletin 124: 75-111.
Guterman, E. 2002. Toward dynamic assessment of reading: Applying metacognitive awareness guidance to reading assessment tasks [J]. Journal of Research in Reading 25(3): 283-98 .
Guthke, J. 1982. The learning test concept: An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test [J]. The German Journal of Psychology 6 (4): 306-24.
Haywood, H. C. 1992. Interactive assessment: A special issue [J]. Journal of Special Education 26: 233-34.
Haywood, H. C. & C. S. Lidz. 2007. Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hill, K. & M. Sabet. 2009. Dynamic speaking assessments [J]. TESOL Quarterly 43(3): 537-45.
Jafary, M. R., N. Nordin & R. Mohajeri. 2012. The effect of dynamic versus static assessment on syntactic development of Iranian college preparatory EFL Learners [J]. English Language Teaching 5(7):149-57.
Kozulin, A. & E. Garb. 2002. Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students [J]. School Psychology International 23: 112-27.
Kozulin, A. & E. Garb. 2004. Dynamic assessment of literacy: English as a third language [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education 19(1): 65-77.
Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2004. Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future [J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49-72.
Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2006. Dynamic Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Teacher's Guide [M]. CALPER University Park, Pennsylvania.
Lantolf, J. P. & S. L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2008. Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages [C]. London: Exquinox.
Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2011. Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development [J]. Language Teaching Research 15(1): 11-33.
Leung. C. 2007. Dynamic assessment: Assessment for and as teaching [J]. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal 4: 257-78.
Lidz, C. S. 1987. Dynamic Assessment: An Interactive Approach to Evaluating Learning Potential [M]. New York: The Guilford Press.
Lidz, C. S. & B. Gindis. 2003. Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children [A]. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller (eds.). Vygotsky Educational Theory in Cultural Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 99-118.
Linda A. & P. D. Greta. 2000. Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal development [J]. Learning and Instruction 10(2): 137-52.
Mardani, M. & M. Tavakoli. 2011. Beyond reading comprehension: The effect of adding a dynamic assessment component on EFL reading comprehension [J]. Journal of Language Teaching & Research 2(3): 688-96.
McNamara, T. 1997.“Interaction” in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? [J]. Applied Linguistics 18: 446-66.
McNamara, T. 2004. Language testing [A]. In A. Davies & C. Elder (eds.). The Handbook of Applied Linguistics [C]. Malden: Blackwell. 763-83.
Pea, E., R. Quinn & A. Iglesias. 1992. Application of dynamic methods to language assessment: A non-biased procedure [J]. Journal of Special Education 26(3): 269-80.
Pishghadam, R., E. Barabadi & A. M. Kamrood. 2011. The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers [J]. Journal of Language Teaching & Research 2( 6):1353-58 .
Poehner, M. E. 2005. Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency among Advanced L2 Learners of French [D]. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Poehner, M. E. 2007. Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning [J]. The Modern Language Journal 91: 323-40.
Poehner, M. E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development [M]. New York: Springer.
Poehner, M. 2009. Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom [J]. TESOL Quarterly 43(3): 471-91.
Poehner, M. E. 2011a. Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 dynamic assessment [J]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21(2): 244-63.
Poehner, M. E. 2011b. Dynamic assessment: Fairness through the prism of mediation [J]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18(2): 99-112.
Poehner, M. E. & J. P. Lantolf. 2005. Dynamic assessment in the language classroom [J]. Language Teaching Research 9(3): 233-65.
Rea-Dickins, P. 2004. Understanding teachers as agents of assessment [J]. Language Testing 21: 249-58.
Rea-Dickins, P. & M. E. Poehner. 2011. Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through dynamic assessment [J]. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18(2): 95-97.
Schneider, E. & L. Ganschow. 2000. Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn a foreign language [J]. Dyslexia 6: 72-82.
Shabani, K., M. Khatib & S. Ebadi. 2010. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development [J]. English Language Teaching 3(4): 237-48.
Shrestha, P. & C. Coffin. 2012. Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development [J]. Assessing Writing 17(1): 55-70.
Sternberg, R. J. & E.L. Grigorenko. 2002. Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tzuriel, D. 2001. Dynamic assessment is not dynamic testing [J]. Issues in Education 7(2): 237-49.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1956. Isbrannye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya (Selected Psychological Investigations) [M]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Pedagogischeskikh Nauk SSSR.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Vygotsky, L. S. 1998. The problem of age [A]. In R. W. Rieber (ed.). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child Psychology [C]. New York: Plenum. 187-206.
Wang, Tzu-Hua. 2010. Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e-Learning effectiveness [J]. Computers & Education 54(4): 1157-66.
韩宝成.2009.动态测量理论、模式及其在外语教育中的应用[J].外语教学与研究(6):452-58.
华柯枫.2010.试探高职英语课程的动态化测量[J].吉林广播电视大学学报(3):105-6.
李雪、尹航.2010.动态立体教学测量模式下的大学英语第二课堂实践[J].佳木斯教育学院学报(5):178.
刘芬.2008.大学英语课程动态评估探讨[J].邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)(2):168-70.
彭金定.2004.大学英语课堂教学动态评估[J].外语界(3):26-31.
蒲秋菊、张家政.2009.大学英语课程动态评估[J].四川文理学院学报(4):106-8.
王华.2011.大学生写作能力小组动态测量分析研究[J].外语测试与教学(3):50-55.
肖德钧、杨善江.2009.多媒体网络下英语“任务型教学”的动态评价体系研究[J].怀化学院学报(4):125-28.
于勇.2009.论大学英语网络教学评价体系的建构原则[J].考试周刊(23):98-99.
张玮.2009.基于网络平台的大学英语自主学习过程管理模式构建[J].电化教育研究(1):74-75.
张艳红.2010.大学英语写作教学的动态评价体系建构[J].解放军外国语学院学报(1):46-50.

[1]	张娜娜;. 工作记忆与二语习得研究——《第二语言习得和加工过程中的工作记忆》评介[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(06): 102-104+107.
[2]	王晓璐;杨连瑞;闫海娟;. 动态系统论视角下的二语学习定向动机流研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(04): 49-54+110.
[3]	范莉;. 语言与思维:在语言发展的过程中[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 6-15.
[4]	谢鹏;金隼;王大明;林卫;钱吕明;. 赫姆霍兹共振原理在空腔容积测量中的研究与应用[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2016, 32(02): 109-112+122.
[5]	靳红玉;. 《二语写作发展多视角研究》述评[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(05): 69-71.
[6]	徐锦芬, 叶晟杉. 二语/外语课堂中的同伴互动探析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(10): 31-36.
[7]	李鲁;秦际宏;杨晓;金隼;. 基于声学原理的发动机压缩比测量系统设计[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2014, 30(04): 85-88.
[8]	王华. 从动态测量角度探索外语学习动机的培养和发展[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(08): 26-30.
[9]	王华;. 外语教学中形成性评估体系的建立[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(06): 48-53+62.
[10]	顾玲;张瑞宏;任海良;陶晔;管荣根;. 用于动态测量的一种新的惯性传感系统[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2009, 25(03): 83-86.
[11]	金建峰;朱昌明;张鹏;王士琴;. 动态测量建立曳引电梯的能耗仿真模型[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2009, 25(02): 112-115+120.