实现优选论的原理和机制

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2017.04.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实现优选论是近些年来研究形态学的新方法。学界对其原理和操作机制的探讨尚不多见。本文从实现优选论的理论基础、前提假设、运作机制、制约条件等方面展开全面讨论,以揭示其本质和优点,有助于更好地开展形态学研究。

Abstract: Realization Optimality Theory is a new morphological framework that has been developed in recent years. There is not much discussion of this framework in Chinese linguistic circles. This article discusses the theoretical fundamentals, assumptions, mechanisms, and constraints of Realization Optimality Theory. It also presents the advantages of this framework in explaining morphological phenomena compared to alternative ones such as conventional Optimality Theory.

中图分类号:

H319

徐政. 实现优选论的原理和机制[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(04): 3-9.

XU Zheng. The Fundamentals and Mechanisms of Realization Optimality Theory[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2017, 17(04): 3-9.

参考文献

Abdel-Massih, E.T. 1971. A Reference Grammar of Tamazight [M]. Ann Arbor : Center for Near Eastern and North African Studies, University of Michigan.
Anderson, S.R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, M. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Aronoff, M. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Aronoff, M. & Z. Xu. 2010. A Realization Optimality—Theoretic approach to affix order [J]. Morphology 20: 381-411.
Baerman, M., D. Brown & G.G. Corbett. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boersma, P. & C. Levelt. 2004. Optimality Theory and phonological acquisition [J]. Annual Review of Language Acquisition (3): 1-50.
Bonet, E. 2004. Morph insertion and allomorphy in Optimality Theory [J]. International Journal of English Studies 4: 74-104.
Broselow, E. 2004. Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language phonology [J]. International Journal of Bilingualism 8: 51-65.
Broselow, E., S. Chen & C. Wang. 1998. The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 261-280.
Broselow, E. & Z. Xu. 2004. Differential difficulty in the acquisition of second language phonology [J]. International Journal of English Studies 4: 135-163.
Bybee, J.L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carstairs, A. 1988. Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion [A]. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds.). Yearbook of Morphology 1988 [C]. Dordrecht: Foris. 67-94.
Carstairs, A. 1990. Phonologically conditioned suppletion [A]. In W.U. Dressler, H.C. Luschützky, O.E. Pfeiffer & J.R. Rennison (eds.). Contemporary Morphology [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 17-23.
Chomsky, N. & M. Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English [M]. New York: Harper and Row.
Duden. 2006. Grammatik (Band 4) [Z]. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Gnanadesikan, A. 2004. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology [A]. In R. Kager, J. Pater & W. Zonneveld (eds.). Constraints in Phonological Acquisition [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 73-108.
Greenberg, J. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements [A]. In J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language [C]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 73-113.
Haspelmath, M. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar [M]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Kiparsky, P. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change [A]. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (eds.). Universals in Linguistic Theory [C]. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 170-210.
Leben, W. 1973. Suprasegmental Phonology [D]. Cambridge: MIT.
Matthews, P.H. 1972. Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, P.H. 1991. Morphology (2nd edn.) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J.J. & A. Prince. 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction (Manuscript) [M]. Massachusetts & New Jersey: University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Rutgers University.
McCarthy, J.J. & A. Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity [A]. In J.N. Beckman, L.W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds.). Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18) [C]. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. 249-384.
Noyer, R. 1992. Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure [D]. Cambridge: MIT.
Prince, A. & P. Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar [M]. Malden: Blackwell.
Rounds, C. 2001. Hungarian: An Essential Grammar [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Stump, G.T. 1993. On rules of referral [J]. Language 69(2): 449-479.
Stump, G.T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vago, R.M. 1980. The Sound Pattern of Hungarian [M]. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Wurzel, W.U. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness [M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Xu, Z. 2007. Inflectional Morphology in Optimality Theory [D]. New York: Stony Brook University.
Xu, Z. 2011. Optimality Theory and morphology [J]. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(7): 466-484.
Xu, Z. 2016. The role of morphology in Optimality Theory [A]. In A. Hippisley & G.T. Stump (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 550-587.
Xu, Z. & M. Aronoff. 2011a. A Realization Optimality Theory approach to blocking and extended morphological exponence [J]. Journal of Linguistics 47(3): 673-707.
Xu, Z. & M. Aronoff. 2011b. A Realization Optimality Theory approach to full and partial identity of forms [A]. In M. Maiden, J.C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.). Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 257-286.
Zwicky, A.M. 1985. How to describe inflection [A]. In M. Niepokuj, M. van Clay, V. Nikiforidou & D. Feder (eds.). Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 11 [C]. California: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 372-386.

[1]	姚顺，马宁，丁俊杰，顾解忡. 不规则波与顺流相互作用的数值模拟与不确定度分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(3): 337-346.
[2]	马志宏，贡亮，林可，毛雨晗，吴伟，刘成良. 基于稻穗几何形态模式识别的在穗籽粒数估测[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2019, 53(2): 239-246.
[3]	金燕萍, 江铭, 贾方明,. 微柱凝胶技术在临床安全输血中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(06): 672-675.
[4]	孙文瑾, 王淑平, 汤伟娴, 陈慧芬,. 7381例孕妇产前不规则抗体检测特异性分析及临床意义[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2019, 18(03): 365-367.
[5]	宋杰1，周健1，鲍伟1，黄文焘2，高翔3. 面向交-直流智能变电站运维专家系统的可扩展建模及其规则和隔离策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(9): 1072-1080.
[6]	逯程1，徐廷学1，王虹2. 基于属性粒化聚类与回声状态网络的末制导雷达故障诊断[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(9): 1112-1119.
[7]	刘虓1,叶家玮1，刘嘉敏2. 基于混合表达图形的二维不规则排样构造算法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2018, 52(7): 825-830.
[8]	张雷;袁远;李璟;秦旭;钟言久;. 基于关联规则的绿色产品目标客户分析[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2018, 34(02): 159-163+166.
[9]	李菁原, 卢兴国,. 成熟B细胞淋巴瘤的复杂性与细胞形态学[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(05): 557-560.
[10]	黄文强, 范宇平, 胡烨, 杨阳, 江宁东, 黄媚媛, 潘家坪, 滕晓明,. 精子形态、顶体区大小与IVF受精率的关系[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2017, 16(03): 270-272.
[11]	常春康,. 骨髓增生异常综合征WHO(2016)分型的修正[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2016, 15(03): 222-225.
[12]	周晓欣;邹益胜;黎荣;丁国富;. 高速列车动力学参数设计系统的研制[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2016, 32(02): 178-181.
[13]	胡艺芹. 论形态学能产性的制约因素[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(12): 42-45.
[14]	刘园1，张在房1，姚迪2，褚学宁3. 基于多目标离散粒子群的产品服务系统方案配置规则提取[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(08): 1123-1130.
[15]	高丽1a,2,周炳海2,杨学良1b,王吉霞1a. 基于多规则资源分配的柔性作业车间调度问题多目标集成优化方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报（自然版）, 2015, 49(08): 1191-1198.