当代外语研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02): 18-24.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.02.004
周统权, 周思若
发布日期:
2020-07-25
作者简介:
周统权,博士,曲阜师范大学翻译学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为神经语言学。电子邮箱:zhoutongquan@126.com;周思若,曲阜师范大学国际交流学院教师。主要研究方向为语言学和对外汉语教学。电子邮箱:695478870@qq.com
基金资助:
Zhou Tongquan, Zhou Siruo
Published:
2020-07-25
摘要: 预期性是人类与生俱来的一种能力,在语言加工中得到更加充分的体现。本文介绍了人脑预期加工效应的普遍性,从非语言知识到语言知识的各个层面,预期性效应无处不在。定中结构与其他结构一样,在加工中表现出自下而上和自上而下两种加工模式的有机结合,前者触发基于语言规则的局部预期效应,后者触发基于语境的语境预期效应。可预期的语言成分比不可预期或低预期的语言成分加工更容易,消耗的认知资源更少。
中图分类号:
周统权, 周思若. 从语言加工的预期性到定中结构加工的预期性[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(02): 18-24.
Zhou Tongquan, Zhou Siruo. Prediction in Language Processing: From Different Linguistic Aspects to Attribute-head Constructions[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018, 18(02): 18-24.
Altmann, G.T.M. 1999. Thematic role assignment in context [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 41:124-145. Altmann, G.T.M. & Y. Kamide. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J]. Cognition 73:247-264. Brothers, T., T.Y. Swaab & M.J. Traxler. 2015. Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence [J]. Cognition 136: 35-149. DeLong, K., T. Urbach & M. Kutas. 2005. Probabilistic word preactivation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity [J]. Nature Neuro-science (8):1117-1121. Dikker, S., Farmer, T.A. & L. Pylkkönen. 2017. Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality [J]. Psychological Science 21(5): 629-634. Farmer, T.A., M.H. Christiansen & P. Monaghan. 2006. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension [R]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:12203-12208. Federmeier, K.D. 2007. Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension [J]. Psychophysiology 44:491-505. Friederici, A.D. 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data [J]. Brain and Language 50: 259-281. Friederici, A.D. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(2):78-84. Fruchter, J., T. Linzen, M. Westerlund & A. Marantz. 2015. Lexical preactivation in basic linguistic phrases [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(10):1912-1935. Grisoni, L., T.M. Miller & F. Pulvermülle. 2017. Neural correlates of semantic prediction and resolution in sentence processing [J]. Journal of Neuroscience 37(8):4848-4858. Huang, H-W., A.M. Meyer & K.D. Federmeier. 2012. A “concrete view” of aging: Event related potentials reveal age-related changes in basic integrative processes in language [J]. Neuropsychologia 50:26-35. Huettig, F. 2015. Four central questions about prediction in language processing [J]. Brain Research 1626:118-135. Ito, A., M. Corley, M.J. Pickering, A.E. Martin & M.S. Nieuland. 2016. Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 86:157-171. Kamide, Y., G.T.M. Altmann & S.L. Haywood. 2003. The timecourse of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 49:133-156. Kutas, M. & S.A. Hillyard. 1983. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies [J]. Memory and Cognition 11: 539-550. Kutas, M. & S.A. Hillyard. 1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association [J]. Nature 307:161-163. Lau, E., C. Stroud, S. Plesch & C. Phillips. 2006. The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis [J]. Brain and Language 98:74-88. Lewis, A.G., L. Wang & M.C.M. Bastiaansen. 2015. Fast oscillatory dynamics during language comprehension: unification or maintenance/ prediction [J]. Brain and Language 145:51-63. Lukyanenko, C. & C. Fischer 2016. Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns [J]. Cognition 146:349-370. Maess, B., F. Mamashl, J. Oblese, L. Helle & A.D. Friederic. 2016. Prediction signatures in the brain: Semantic pre-activation during language comprehension [J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (10): 1-11. Mishra, R.K., N. Singh, A.Pandey & F. Huettig. 2012. Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye movements are modulated by reading ability: Evidence from Indian low and high literates [J]. Journal of Eye Movement Research 5(1):1-10. Nieuwland, M. 2017. Limits on prediction in language comprehension: A multi-lab failure to replicate evidence for probabilistic preactivation of phonology [J]. BioRxiv (10):11-18. Osterhout, L., P.J. Holcomb & D.A. Swinney. 1994. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20:786-803. Otten, M., M.S. Nieuwland & J.J.A. Van Berkum. 2007. Great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language [J]. BMC Neuroscience (8):89. Pickering, M.J. & S. Garrod. 2007. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (11):105-110. Saffran, J.R., R.N. Aslin & E.L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants [J]. Science 274(5):1926-1928. Smith, N.J. & R. Levy. 2013. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic [J]. Cognition 128:302-319. Shapiro, L.P., B. Gordon, N. Hack & J. Killackey. 1993. Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia [J]. Brain and Language 45:423-447. Steinhauer, K. & J.E. Drury. 2012. On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies [J]. Brain & Language 120:135-162. Staub, A. & C. Clifton Jr. 2006. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from Either...or [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32:425-436. Staub, A., M. Grant, C. Clifton Jr. & K. Rayner. 2009. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35:806-814. Van Berkum, J.J.A., C.M. Brown, P. Zwitserlood, V. Kooijman & P. Hagoort. 2005. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 31:443-467. Van Berkum, J.J.A., P. Zwitserlood, P. Hagoort & C.M. Brown. 2003. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect [J]. Cognitive Brain Research 17:701-718. Wicha, N.Y.Y., E.M. Moreno & M. Kutas. 2004. Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading [J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:1272-1288. Ziegler. J. & L. Pylkkänen. 2016. Scalar adjectives and the temporal unfolding of semantic composition: An MEG investigation [J]. Neuropsychologia 89:161-171. Zhang, L. & L. Pylkkänen. 2015. The interplay of composition and concept specificity in the left anterior temporal lobe: An MEG study [J]. NeuroImage 111:228-240. 周统权、刘振标. 2017. 定中结构的加工研究:回顾与展望[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)(2):30-41. |
[1] | 刘建军. “新文科”还是“新学科”?——兼论新文科视域下的外国文学教学改革[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 21-28. |
[2] | 杨敏;侍怡君;. 基于文化与功能视角的英语教材评价框架构建[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 57-67. |
[3] | 武建国;张赢月;郝美丽;. 功能语境重构与商业读物的翻译——以The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon,Apple,Facebook,and Google的汉译为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 120-128. |
[4] | 薛小姣, 王小楠, 周卫京. 中国英语学习者/l/-/r/产出的可理解度[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(02): 44-56. |
[5] | 杨雅平. 日常语言哲学的浴火重生[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 97-105. |
[6] | 任文;. 新时代语境下翻译人才培养模式再探究:问题与出路[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(06): 92-98. |
[7] | 梁晓波;. 国防部新闻发布话语的情感因素[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(04): 34-39+48+108. |
[8] | 柳加仁, 纪倩倩, 周统权. 汉语定中结构的字面义与非字面义甄别:来自全脑与左/右脑的加工证据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(02): 30-36. |
[9] | 崔艳秋, 黄小蓉. 语境因素对独立学院学生英语口语能力的影响[J]. 当代外语研究, 2017, 17(03): 84-89. |
[10] | 蒋楠;范莉;乔晓妹;张辉;杨枫;吴诗玉;. 第二语言加工:学科内容、研究方法及与二语习得的关系[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(06): 1-8+108. |
[11] | 周祥;刘龙根;. “知之”为“不知”?——知识语句语境敏感性实证研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(05): 32-38+94. |
[12] | 常海潮. 中国学生英语能力可持续发展的途径和方法——基于中国当代英语教育名家叙事的考查[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(08): 37-42. |
[13] | 韩彩英, 武娜. 语境理论的研究现状和语境论题的语言学学理意义[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 8-11. |
[14] | 范振强. 新认知语用学视域下同语的语境效果和生成动因[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(07): 12-16. |
[15] | 杨贵章, 曾利沙. “语境参数理论”视角下的宋词英译研究——《江城子·记梦》之意美阐释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(04): 48-52. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||