当代外语研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01): 67-76.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2019.01.009
雷蕾
出版日期:2019-01-28
发布日期:2019-02-25
作者简介:雷蕾,华中科技大学外国语学院教授。主要研究方向为应用语言学、文献计量。电子邮箱:leileicn@126.com
基金资助:LEI Lei
Online:2019-01-28
Published:2019-02-25
摘要： 本研究分析了语言学领域的ESI高被引论文。研究有如下几点发现。首先,来自中国研究机构的论文只有三篇入选高被引论文;其次,应用语言学和心理语言学高影响因子期刊论文更有可能入选高被引论文;最后,研究性综述和研究方法类论文更有可能成为高被引论文。立足双一流建设大背景,本文还从语言学一流学科建设视角对研究结果进行讨论。
中图分类号:
雷蕾. 语言学领域高被引论文——文献计量分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(01): 67-76.
LEI Lei. Highly Cited Articles in Linguistics: A Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2019, 19(01): 67-76.
| Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson & D. M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4):390-412. Barr, D. J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers & H. J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3):255-278. Bound, K., T. Saunders, J. Wilsdon & J. Adams. 2013. China’s Absorptive State: Research, Innovation and the Prospects for China-UK Collaboration [M]. London: Nesta. Chuang, K., M. Wang & Y. Ho. 2011. High-impact papers presented in the subject category database of the institute for scientific information [J]. Scientometrics 87(3):551-562. Fu, H., K. Chuang, M. Wang & Y. Ho. 2011. Characteristics of research in China assessed with essential science indicators [J]. Scientometrics 88(5):841-862. Harzing, A. W. 2015. Health warning: Might contain multiple personalities—The problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters essential science indicators [J]. Scientometrics 105(3):2259-2270. Hu, Z., W. Tian, S. Xu, C. Zhang & X. Wang. 2018. Four pitfalls in normalizing citation indicators: An investigation of ESI’s selection of highly cited papers [J]. Journal of Informetrics 12(4):1133-1145. Hung, H.-T. 2015. Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning [J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28(1):81-96. Hyland, K. 2016. Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 31:58-69. Jaeger, T. F. 2008. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4):434-446. Jiang, F. K. & K. Hyland. 2018. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse [J]. Applied Linguistics 39(4):508-531. Lei, L. & S. Liao. 2017. Publications in linguistics journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau (2003~2012): A bibliometric analysis [J]. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 24(1):54-64. Leydesdorff, L. & C. Wagner. 2009. Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system [J]. Scientometrics 78:23-36. Liu, W., G. Hu, L. Tang & Y. Wang. 2015. China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978~2013) [J]. Journal of Informetrics 9: 555-569. Matuschek, H., R. Kliegl, S. Vasishth, H. Baayen & D. Bates. 2017. Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 94:305-315. Moiwo, J. & F. Tao. 2013. The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership [J]. Scientometrics 95:1031-1050. Taboada, M., J. Brooke, M. D. Tofiloski,K. Voll & M. Stede. 2011. Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis [J]. Computational Linguistics 37:267-307. Tausczik, Y. R. & J. W. Pennebaker. 2010. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods [J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1):24-54. Zhang, H., D. Patton & M. Kenney. 2013. Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project [J]. Research Policy 42:765-775. Zhou, P., B. Thijs & W. Glönzel. 2009. Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? [J] Scientometrics 79:593-621. 王晶金、刘立. 2016. QS世界大学学科排名指标体系及其启示 [J]. 全球科技经济瞭望 (10): 46-52. 骆正林. 2018. 第四轮学科评估及其对新闻传播学的影响 [J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报) (9): 153-160. |
| [1] | 李战子. 新媒体素养:内涵和演变——兼论对功能语言学话语分析的新挑战[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 13-20. |
| [2] | 曾国才. 对话语言学:核心思想及其启示[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 453(3): 53-60. |
| [3] | 刘海涛, 郑国锋. 大数据时代语言学理论研究的路径与意义[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 5-18. |
| [4] | 田秘, 赵永峰. 概念整合理论的批评认知语言学阐释——以“the *ly challenged”委婉构式为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 452(2): 84-95. |
| [5] | 王寅. 体认语言学的象豹观与语言研究的多元化[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 38-43. |
| [6] | 胡壮麟. 后韩礼德时代功能语言学的发展趋势[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 451(1): 44-53. |
| [7] | 傅敬民, 阮雨俊. 汉语欧化的语言学特征及其规范[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 121-128. |
| [8] | 甄凤超. 语料库语言学研究热点追踪与思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 450(6): 89-100. |
| [9] | 沈骑;. 语言安全理论的源与流[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 39-45. |
| [10] | 何航;王银泉;. 外语学习焦虑研究的回顾与反思(2001～2018)——基于一篇高被引论文的可视化分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 68-82. |
| [11] | 李宇明;. 驱动语言学发展的三类问题[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(02): 3-6+129. |
| [12] | 杜世洪;. 语言学研究中的蚂蚁与蜘蛛[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(02): 14-22+38. |
| [13] | . 本期人物[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(02): 129-. |
| [14] | 沈骑;. 中国应用语言学的学科责任与学术担当[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(01): 26-30+43. |
| [15] | 杜世洪;. 语言学是什么样的好箭?[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(01): 36-43. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
