当代外语研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 79-88.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.06.009
出版日期:
2020-11-28
发布日期:
2021-10-13
作者简介:
姚剑鹏,博士,宁波工程学院外国语学院教授。主要研究方向为话语分析、认知语言学。电子邮箱: 基金资助:
Online:
2020-11-28
Published:
2021-10-13
摘要:
近几年,外语教学的有效性问题受到学界广泛的关注和热议。本文从外语交际策略视角,围绕学习者会话自我修补,结合“阅读与讨论”教学模式,探讨这一问题。研究基于COLSEC语料库,从会话自我修补的三个阶段展开。结果发现,学习者在修补过程中存在不少问题,如,未能监控到大量言语输出错误,填充词运用意识淡薄,过度自我重复等。研究数据反映出外语教学的有效性问题。本文认为,有效的外语教学既要保证学习者获得“高量高质”的可理解性输入,同时,又要确保在一个类似于“社会”的语境中,通过互动、意义协商,使输入被吸收和内化,实现最优的可理解性输出。学习者会话自我修补策略作为一种行之有效的交际策略和学习策略,不仅检验学习者语言输入的“量”和“质”,而且使学习者在语言使用中监控言语,验证假设,注意差距并自我进行调节以达到修正后输出。因此,在外语教学过程中,既要重视语言输入与输出,又要强化策略意识,最终提升外语水平。“阅读与讨论”教学模式为学习者会话自我修补的使用提供了有效的路径,两者相互作用助推有效教学。
中图分类号:
姚剑鹏. 学习者会话自我修补与外语有效教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(6): 79-88.
YAO Jianpeng. Learner's Speech Self-repair and Effective Foreign Language Teaching[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2020, 20(6): 79-88.
[1] | Allwood J., J. Nivre & E. Ahls'en. 1992. On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback[J]. Journal of Semantics 9:1-26. |
[2] | Allwood J. 2001. Dialog Coding-Function and Grammar: Gteborg Coding Schemas[C]. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics. |
[3] | Berg T. 1986. The problem of language control: Editing, monitoring and feedback[J]. Psychological Research 48:133-144. |
[4] | Brennan S. E. & M. Williams. 1995. The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 34:383-398. |
[5] | Brookfield S. D. & S. Preskill. 1999. Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[6] | Clark H. H. & J. E. Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking[J]. Cognition 84:73-111. |
[7] | Davis B. G. 1993. Tools for Teaching[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[8] | Doughty C. 1988. An Empirical Study of Relativization in English as a Second Language[D]. University of Pennsylvania. |
[9] | Duncan S. & D.W. Fiske. 1977. Face-to-face Interaction: Research, Methods and Theory[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
[10] |
Fox Tree J. E. 2001. Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension[J]. Memory and Cognition 29 (2): 320-326.
pmid: 11352215 |
[11] |
Fraundorf, H. S. H. & D. G. Watson. 2011. The disfluent discourse: Effects of pauses on recall[J]. Journal of Memory and Language 65 (2):161-175.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.004 URL |
[12] | Levelt W. J. M. 1989. Speaking:From Intention to Articulation[M]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. |
[13] |
de Bot K. 1996. Review article: The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis[J]. Language Learning 46 (3):529-555.
doi: 10.1111/lang.1996.46.issue-3 URL |
[14] | Gass, S. & E. Varonis. 1985. Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning [A]. S.Gass & C. M. Rowley (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition[C]. MA: Newbury House. |
[15] | Gass S. M. & E. M. Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16:283-302. |
[16] | Kormos J. 1999. Monitoring and self-repair in L2[J]. Language Learning 49 (2):302-342. |
[17] |
Long M. 1983. Linguistic and conversational adjustment to non-native speakers[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5 (2):177-93.
doi: 10.1017/S0272263100004848 URL |
[18] | Maclay, H. & C. E. Osgood. 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous speech[J]. Word 15:19-44. |
[19] |
Pica T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis & L. Morgenthaler. 1989. Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11 (1):63-90.
doi: 10.1017/S027226310000783X URL |
[20] |
Robinson P. 1995. Attention, memory and the “noticing” hypothesis[J]. Language Learning 45 (2): 283-331.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x URL |
[21] | Rose R. L. 1998. The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech[EB/OL]. [2014-12-7].http://www.gpwu.ac.jp/-rose/files/madiss. |
[22] | Schehadeh A. 1999. Insights into learner output[J]. Forum 37 (4):2-7. |
[23] |
Schehadeh A. 2002. Comprehensible output, from occurrence to acquisition: An agenda for acquisitional research[J]. Language Learning 52 (3):597-647.
doi: 10.1111/lang.2002.52.issue-3 URL |
[24] | Schmidt, R. & S. Frota. 1986. Developing basic conversational ability in a second language:A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese[A]. R. R. Day(ed.). Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. |
[25] | Swain M. 1985. Communicative competence:Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development[A]. S. M.Gass & C. G. Madden (eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition [C]. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. |
[26] | Swain M. 2005. The output hypothesis:Theory and research[A]. E. Hinkel(ed.). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning [C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[27] | Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning[J]. Applied Linguistics 16 (3):371-391. |
[28] | Tomasello, M. & M. Carpenter. 2007. Shared intentionality[J]. Developmental Science 10 (1): 121-125. |
[29] | Zellner B. 1994. Pauses and the temporal structure of speech[A]. E. Keller (ed.), Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition[C]. Chichester: John Wiley. |
[30] | 李广明. 2010. PETS口试环境下中国英语学习者交际策略研究[J]. 济宁学院学报(3):87-89. |
[31] | 甘阳. 2006. 哈钦斯的大学理念与芝大转型[J]. 21世纪经济报道(6):1-2. |
[32] | 吴诗玉、黄绍强. 2018. 大学英语教学,为什么要坚守“阅读与讨论”?[J]. 当代外语研究(2):9-14. |
[33] | 吴诗玉、黄绍强. 2019. 何为“有效”的外语教学?——根植于本土教学环境和教学对象特点的思考?[J]. 当代外语研究(3):37-47. |
[34] | 杨惠中. 2005. 序言[A]. 杨惠中、卫乃兴.中国学习者英语口语语料库建设与研究[C]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社. |
[1] | 姚剑鹏. 二语习得视阈下会话自我修补研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(02): 33-37. |
[2] | 姚剑鹏. 二语教师话语中的修补启动[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(09): 70-75. |
[3] | 田贵森;. 语言变异的功能语言学思考[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(03): 22-27+159. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||