当代外语研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 77-88.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.06.008
孙毅(
), 周俊子
出版日期:2021-12-28
发布日期:2021-12-31
通讯作者:
孙毅
E-mail:sytony9728@163.com
基金资助:
SUN Yi(), ZHOU Junzi
Online:2021-12-28
Published:2021-12-31
Contact:
SUN Yi
E-mail:sytony9728@163.com
摘要：
复合是英语词汇发展过程中构建新词的主要方法之一,其中名名复合词在构成新词中占比较大,这一独特的语言现象引起人们浓厚的兴趣和广泛的关注。但目前多数研究仅限于复合词的形态结构、句法结构或语法关系,极少涉及词的语义层面。据此,本文通过对英语名名复合词进行语义特征分析,在认知隐喻学领域探求两个成分名词间的语义关系,并通过概念整合理论解读该词类的组合理据。
中图分类号:
孙毅, 周俊子. 名名复合词语义的认知隐喻理据新释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 21(6): 77-88.
SUN Yi, ZHOU Junzi. A New Explanation of the Cognitive Metaphorical Motivation of Noun-noun Compound[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 21(6): 77-88.
图1
“三明治一代”的整合示意
图2
“麦片盒”的整合示意
图3
“奖杯孩子”的整合示意
图4
“玩具食品”的整合示意
| [1] | Adams V. 2001. Complex Words in English[M]. Harlow: Longman. |
| [2] | Algeo J. 1991. Fifty Years Among the New Words: A Dictionary of Neologisms, 1941-1991[Z]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [3] | Bloomfield L. 1933. Language[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| [4] | Clark E. 1981. Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words [A].In W. Deutsch (ed.). The Child’s Construction of Language [C].New York: Academic Press. 299-328. |
| [5] | Dirven R. & M. Verspoor. 1998. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| [6] | Evans, V. & A. Tyler. 2004. Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: The case of in [A].In G. Radden & К-u. Panther (eds.). Studies in Linguistic Motivation [C].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 157-192. |
| [7] | Faber, P. & C. Linares.. 2004. The role of imagery in specialized communication [A].In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & A. Kwiatkowska (eds.). Imagery in Language: Festschrift in honour of Professor Ronald W. Langacker (Łódž Studies in Language 10) [C].Bern: Peter Lang. 585-602. |
| [8] | Fauconnier G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities[M]. New York: Basic Books. |
| [9] | Indurkhya B. 1992. Metaphor and Cognition[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwers. |
| [10] | Kõvecses Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [11] | Lakoff G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. |
| [12] | Lamb S. 1998. Pathways of The Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| [13] | Langacker R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. |
| [14] | Levi J. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals[M]. New York: Academic Press. |
| [15] | Marchand H. 1960. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation: A Synchronic-diachronic Approach[M]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. |
| [16] | Plag I. 2003. Word-formation in English[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [17] | Radden, G. & Z. Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy [A].In К-u. Panther & G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [C].Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17-59. |
| [18] | Ryder M. 1994. Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-noun Compounds[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press. |
| [19] |
Sana F., J.Park, C.Gagné & T. Spalding. 2021. The interplay between inhibitory control and metaphor conventionality[J]. Mem Cognit 49(6): 1267-1284.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01152-7 URL |
| [20] | Selkirk E. 1982. The Syntax of Words[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press. |
| [21] | Warren B. 1978. Semantic Patterns of Noun-Noun Compounds (Gothenburg Studies in English 41)[M]. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University Press. |
| [22] | Williams E. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245-274. |
| [23] | 王文斌. 2005. 英语复合词的内在句法、语义及认知构建[J]. 外语学刊 (2):39-43. |
| [24] | 王文斌. 2006. 再论隐喻中的相似性[J]. 四川外国语学院学报 (2):125-130. |
| [25] | 桂诗春. 1985. 心理语言学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社. |
| [26] | 陆国强. 1999. 现代英语词汇学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社. |
| [27] | 李明明、 孙毅. 2021. 概念整合理论下的隐喻阐释及其翻译策略研探[J]. 语言、翻译与认知 (1): 94-106. |
| [28] | 孙毅. 2020a. 概念隐喻理论能解释所有“我们赖以生存的隐喻”吗? --论隐喻类型甄别的维度[J]. 英语研究 (1): 95-106. |
| [29] | 孙毅. 2020b. 跨语言饮食隐喻异同的哲学-文化双轴渊源摭论[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) (4): 137-143. |
| [30] | 孙毅、 梁晓晶. 2020. 崔致远诗歌意蕴的当代隐喻学重构与新释[J]. 东疆学刊 (3): 108-128. |
| [31] | 孙毅、 周锦锦. 2020. 认知隐喻学畛域中汉英自我概念隐喻意涵重塑[J]. 外语研究 (4): 13-21. |
| [1] | 曹阳, 童家伟. 零动词存在构式的句法语义特征及认知阐释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(3): 131-139. |
| [2] | 鹿士义, 邓彧君, 杨诗雨. “V着”类存在句构式的语义特征及其提取[J]. 当代外语研究, 2019, 19(03): 80-90. |
| [3] | 孙毅, 陈叶. 汉英数字隐喻新视界探幽揽胜[J]. 当代外语研究, 2018, 18(01): 5-12. |
| [4] | 刘礼进, 骆欢. 汉英空间语言参照系表达对比研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(01): 23-30. |
| [5] | 张敬源, 夏静. 加的夫语法视阈下的现代汉语“使”字结构研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(05): 17-22. |
| [6] | 侯国金. “的时候”误用的词汇语用批评[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(10): 13-17. |
| [7] | 彭志瑛. 关联理论视域下英文影视字幕汉译隐化策略的理据研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(07): 44-48. |
| [8] | 邓雪梅;. 围绕隐喻的判断和解释——基于认知隐喻和二语习得的相关研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(04): 26-30+77. |
| [9] | 魏在江;. “孩奴”的语用预设意义及其认知理据[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(07): 13-16+60. |
| [10] | 李二占;王艾录;. “理据”作为语言学术语的几种涵义[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(04): 19-24+60. |
| [11] | 卢卫中;. 词义演变与理解的转喻阐释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2010, 10(11): 28-31+61. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
