“后真相”时代的语言及其危机

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2022.05.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

“后真相”成为牛津词典年度词汇以来,相关研究盘亘政治、新闻传播等领域。语言作为传播真相和传递意识形态的重要媒介,是后真相研究的一个重要向度。本文回溯了“后真相”何以成为热词,分析了其词语内涵,并梳理了其在现实中的话语形态,认为公共话语者对语言修辞的滥用、社交媒体对主观情感的放大,加剧了“后真相”的蔓延,也导致了人们对语言的失信。语言信任危机背后是“说话者”对语言的操控、大众媒体对语言的扭曲,以及语言自身在新旧媒体更迭时经历的裂变与阵痛。作为说话主体的人,只有恢复语言使用的严谨,保持对语言文明的尊重与谦卑,才可能更好地维护语言的真理与美学意义。

关键词: 后真相, 真相, 语言, 媒体

Abstract:

The word“post-truth”has remained its popularity in fields of politics and communication since it became word of the year of Oxford Dictionary. Language constitutes an important dimension of post-truth research given its use as a medium for spreading truth and ideology. The article traces how “post-truth” came into being as a buzzword and evaluates the role language plays in presenting or misinterpreting “truth”. The overuse of rhetoric by public speakers and the powerful effect of media on our emotions lead to the spread of post-truth and the declining of confidence in language. Attributing to the crisis is the manipulation of language in communication, the abuse of it in mass media, and the generational language gap brought by new media. The author holds that the truth and aesthetic value of language can be maintained only with a genuine commitment to language itself and the proper use of it.

Key words: post-truth, truth, language, social media

中图分类号:

H0-0

林轶. “后真相”时代的语言及其危机[J]. 当代外语研究, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.

LIN Yi. Language and Its Crisis in the Post-Truth Era[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2022, 22(5): 80-87.

参考文献 26

[1]	Davies, W. 2016. The Age of Post-Truth Politics, The New York Times[EB/OL]. [2020-01-20]. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html.
[2]	Frankfurt, H. 2002. On Bullshit[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[3]	Habermas, J. 1992. Modernity: An Unfinished Project[A]. In C. Jencks (ed.). The Postmodern Reader[M]. London & New York: St. Martin Press
[4]	Keane, J. Post-truth and Democracy[EB/OL]. [2019-11-18]. https://www.rccp.pku.edu.cn/mzyt/62528.html.
[5]	Keyes, R. 2004. The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life[M]. London: St. Martin’s Press.
[6]	Lakoff, G. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate[M]. London: Chelsea Green Publishing.
[7]	Levitin, D. 2017. Weaponized lies, How to Think Critically in the Post-truth Era[M]. London & New York: Penguin Group.
[8]	Post-truth politics: Art of the Lie., 2016. Economist[EB/OL]. [2022-02-01] https://www.economist.com/leaders/2016/09/10/art-of-the-lie.
[9]	Elliot, O’Donnell、刘学蔚. 2020. 否思“后真相”:基于李普曼舆论学视角[J]. 新闻与传播评论 73(3):5-14.
[10]	Snow, C. P. 1993. The Two Cultures[M]. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
[11]	本雅明. 1999. 本雅明文选(陈永国、马海良编)[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[12]	陈龙. 2017. 修辞术博弈:“后真相时代”的政治传播症候[J]. 探索与争鸣(4):18-21.
[13]	郭小安、胡佳思. 2021. 后真相研究的中外对比分析及反思[J]. 全球传媒学刊 8(2):132-151.
[14]	康德. 2011. 纯粹理性批判(李秋零译)[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[15]	来永玲. 2020. 通往“后真相”:真相问题的核心争论与发生机制研究[J]. 新闻界(8):74-95.
[16]	莱尔内尔·特里林. 2006. 诚与真(刘佳林译)[M]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社.
[17]	马歇尔·麦克卢汉. 2011. 理解媒介(何道宽译)[M]. 上海: 译林出版社.
[18]	迈克尔·林奇. 2017. 失控的真相(赵亚男译)[M]. 北京: 中信出版集团.
[19]	米歇尔·福柯. 2003. 知识考古学(谢强、马月译)[M]. 上海: 三联书店.
[20]	尼尔·波兹曼. 2015. 娱乐至死(章艳译)[M]. 北京: 中信出版社.
[21]	乔治·帕克. 2021. 下沉年代(刘冉译)[M]. 上海: 文汇出版社.
[22]	乔治·斯坦纳. 2013. 语言与沉默:论语言、文学、与非人道(李小均译)[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[23]	陶文昭. 2015. 中国民粹主义新特点:“三仇”“两求”与“两过”[J]. 人民论坛(5): 15-19.
[24]	汪少华、张薇. 2018. “后真相”时代话语研究的新路径:批评架构分析[J]. 外语教学 (4) :29-34.
[25]	约翰·加德纳. 2017. 成为小说家(孟庆玲、伊小丽译)[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社: 66-111.
[26]	王品芝、李丹妮. 2019. 七成受访者感觉自己语言越来越贫乏[N]. 中国青年报 (03-21): 05.