汉语短时时间副词“立即”、“立马”和“立刻”的语法化研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究了汉语中短时时间副词“立即”、“立马”和“立刻”的语法化过程。本研究说明了两个很有意义的问题,一是语义共性在语言系统与认知系统中更具有普遍性,二是汉语中连动结构具有重要的研究价值和理论意义。这三个词在语法化为时间副词之前,各自的组成要素之间的最初结构关系各不相同,但它们却都具有表示“短时”意义的共同语义基础,而且在语法过程中,都经历了构成连动结构的句法过程。这说明,历时研究对理论建设具有十分重要的作用,对揭示与解释共性规律具有不可或缺的作用。

关键词: 立即, 立马, 立刻, 语法化

Abstract: The paper examines the grammaticalization of the Chinese short time adverbs Liji, Like and Lima. The study shows two important points. One is that the semantic universals are more fundamental in linguistic and cognitive systems; the other is that serial constructions are of much research value for theory construction. The three words, before they are grammaticalized into short time adverbs had different compositional relations. But their common semantic features paved the way for them to grammaticalization into short time adverbs through serial constructions. This shows diachronic studies can shed much light for theory construction and will play a crucial role in the explanation of universal principles.

中图分类号:

李舟, 刘正光. 汉语短时时间副词“立即”、“立马”和“立刻”的语法化研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(02): 16-21.

LI Zhou, LIU Zhengguang. The Grammaticalization of the Mandarin Chinese Short Time Adverbs Liji, Like and Lima[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(02): 16-21.

参考文献

Bisang, W. 1998. Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions [A]. In A.G. Ramat & P. J. Hopper (eds.). The Limits of Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 13-58.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins Revere & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cabrera, J. C. M. 1998. On the relationships between grammaticalization and lexicalization [A]. In A. G. Ramat & P. J. Hopper (eds.). The Limits of Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 211-28.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language [A]. In Stevan R. Harnad, H. D. Steklis & J. Lancaster (eds.). Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech [C]. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. 20-32.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. Topics in lexical semantics [A]. In Roger W. Code (ed.). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory [C]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 76-138.
Harris, A. C. 1997. Remarks on grammaticalization [A]. In M. Butt & T. H. Kings (eds.). Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference [C]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ⅰ-ⅲ.
Heine, B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization [M]. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernard & Tania Kuteva. 2007. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization [M]. Beijing: World Books Publishing Corporation.
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hunnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hopper, P. J. 1991. Principles of grammaticalization [A]. In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Approach to Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdami John Benjamins. 17-36.
Hopper, P. J. 1998. The paradigm at the end of the universe [A]. In A. G. Ramat & P. J. Hopper (eds.). The Limits of Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 147-58.
Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott 1993. Grammaticalization [M]. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1945. The evolution of grammatical categories [A]. In Jerzy Kurylowicz (ed.). Esquisses Linguistiques Ⅱ [C]. Munich: Wilhelm Fink. 34-58.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1983. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lehman, C. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change [J]. Lingua e Stile 20(3): 303-18.
Lehmann, C. 1986. Grammaticalization and linguistic typology [J]. General Linguistics 26(1): 3-23.
Lehmann, C. 2002. New reflections on gramamticalization and lexicalization [A]. In Wischer & Diewald (eds.). New Reflections on Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. 1-18.
Lehmann. W. P. &Y. Makiel. 1982. Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’ évolution des forms grammaticales [J]. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza).
Ramat, A. G. 1998. Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization [A]. In A. G. Ramat & P. J. Hopper (eds.). The Limits of Grammatlicalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107-28.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representation of semantic categories [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104: 192-233.
Sweetser, E. E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms [A]. In Shopen, Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. Ⅲ [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 57-149.
Taylor, John R. 1997. Linguisitc Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. Oxford: Clarendon.
Traugott, E. C. & E. Kǒnig. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revised [A]. In Traugott & Heine (eds.). Approach to Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 189-218.
Traugott, E. C. & B. Heine. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. & B. Richard. Dasher. 2002. Rgularity in Semantic Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. 1999. The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: A stuffy in subjectification [A]. In A. Blank & P. Koch (eds.). Historical Semantics and Cognition [C]. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 177-96.
Ungerer, F. & H. J. Schmid. 2001. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Yu, Ning. 1998. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
董秀芳.2002.词汇化:汉语双音词的衍生和发展[M].成都:四川民族出版社.
董秀芳.2004.汉语的词库与词法[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
高娜.2009.现代汉语时间副词历时研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学.
黄伯荣、廖旭东.1997.现代汉语[M].北京:高等教育出版社.
胡壮麟.2003.语法化的若干问题[J].现代外语(1):85-92.
黎锦熙.1924.新著国语文法[Z].北京:商务印书馆.
李姝.2008.“马上,赶紧”类短时时间副词研究[D].广西:广西师范大学.
李顺军.2009.现代汉语中时间副词“马上”的演变[J].长江师范学院学报(3):11-21.
陆俭明、马真.1985.现代汉语虚词散论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
沈敏.2009.现代汉语短时类副词考察[D].黑龙江:东北师范大学.
王寅、严辰松.2005.语法化的特征、动因和机制[J].解放军外国语学报(4):1-5.
吴福祥.2006.语法化与汉语历史语法研究[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社.
杨荣祥.2001.汉语副词形成邹议[J].语言学论丛23:99-121.
杨荣祥.2005.近代汉语副词研究[M].北京:商务印书馆.
姚琳.2005.现代汉语承前性短时类时间副词的语法化[D].天津:南开大学.
张磊.2000.时间副词研究[D].北京:首都师范大学.
张亚军.2002.副词与限定描状功能[M].安徽:安徽教育出版社.
张谊生.2003.从“曾经”的功能扩展看汉语副词的多功能性[J].汉语学习(5):1-9.
张谊生.2004.现代汉语副词探索[M].上海:学林出版社.

[1]	刘承宇;胡曼妮;. 历史语用学视角下的语法化——以providing(that)和provided(that)为例[J]. 当代外语研究, 2015, 15(05): 5-10+76.
[2]	鞠志勤. 语言建筑论框架下的体范畴研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014, 14(10): 25-30.