当代外语研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (08): 6-13.
吴若蕙
出版日期:
2013-08-15
发布日期:
2020-07-25
作者简介:
吴若蕙,财团法人语言训练测验中心研发长。主要研究方向为标准化语言测试发展、效度研究。电子邮箱:jw@lttc.ntu.edu.tw
Jessica R. W. Wu
Online:
2013-08-15
Published:
2020-07-25
摘要: 语言训练测验中心研发办理的“全民英语能力分级检定测验”(简称“全民英检”)自2010年起实施“全民英检”高级电脑化写作测验,提供受测者在原有传统纸笔测验外之另一选择。但是在纸笔测验与电脑化测验双轨并行时,即使是考题一样、测试时间相同,受测者在两种不同应考环境下的表现是否相当?对评分者是否造成影响?这些问题须透过纸笔与电脑化测验的平行研究(comparability studies)来解答。本研究探讨“全民英检”高级写作纸笔与电脑化测验是否平行,比较受测者在两种测验模式下的表现,含受测者分数(score comparability)与受测者文本分析(textual and linguistic features)。结果显示两测验的结果相当、两者并存是可行的,但仍须收集更多受测者作答资料、持续进行研究,以确保两测验具有相同的效度、品质。
中图分类号:
吴若蕙. “全民英检”高级写作纸笔与电脑化测验之平行研究初探[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(08): 6-13.
Jessica R. W. Wu. A Comparability Study between Paper-based and Computer-based Test Mode of the GEPT Advanced Writing Test[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(08): 6-13.
AydΙn, S. 2006. The effect of computers on the test and inter-rater reliability of writing tests of ESL learners [J/OL]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 5(1): 75-81. [2003-06-30]. http:∥w3.balikesir.edu.tr/~saydin/index_dosyalar/56.pdf Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chambers, L. 2008. Computer-based and paper-based writing assessment: A comparative text analysis [J]. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes 34: 9-15. McDonald, A. 2002. The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessment [J]. Computers & Education 39 (3): 299-312. Mead, A. & F. Drasgow. 1993. Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis [J]. Psychological Bulletin 114 (3): 449-58. Nation, P. & A. Heatley. 1996. Range. Wellington: School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington [OL]. [2013-06-30]. http:∥www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation Powers, D., M. Fowles, M. Farnum & P. Ramsey. 1994. Will they think less of my handwritten essay if others words process theirs? Effects on essay scores of intermingling handwritten and word-processed essays [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement 31(3): 220-33. Russell, M. & W. Haney. 1997. Testing writing on computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computer and via paper-and-pencil [J/OL]. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 5 (3). [2013-06-30]. http:∥epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/604 Russell, M & W. Tao. 2004a. Effects of handwriting and computer-print on composition scores: A follow-up to Powers, Flowles, Farnum and Ramsey [J/OL]. Practical Assessment and Research Evaluation 9(1). [2013-06-30]. http:∥pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=1 Russell, M. & W. Tao. 2004b. The influence of computer-print on rater scores [J/OL]. Practical Assessment and Research Evaluation 9 (10). [2013-06-30]. http:∥pareonline.net/getvn.?=9&n=10 Roever, C. & Y. C. Pan. 2008. Test review: GEPT (General English Proficiency Test) [J]. Language Testing 25(3): 403-18. Scott, M. 1998. WordSmith Tools, Version 3.0 [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Weir, C., B. O'Sullivan, Y. Jin & S. Bax. 2007. Does the computer make a difference? The reaction of candidates to a computer-based versus a traditional hand-written form of the IELTS Writing component: Effects and impact [J]. IELTS Research Reports 7: 311-47. van de Vijver, F. J. R. & M. Harsveld. 1994. The incomplete equivalent of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the General Aptitude Test Battery [J/OL]. Journal of Applied Psychology 79(6): 852-859. [2013-06-30]. http:∥arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=26674 Weir, C. J. 2005. Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-based Approach [M]. NY: Palgrave MacMillan. Wu, J. 2012. GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan [J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 9(1): 11-25. Wu, R. Y. F. & I. C. Chao. 2011. A case study of effects of delivery mode on test performance and markers' rating [R]. Proceedings of the 13th Academic Forum on English Language Testing in Asia, Hong Kong, 31-48. |
[1] | 李文中, 濮建忠, 甄凤超, 邵斌. 再探语义韵①[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 446(2): 72-83. |
[2] | 于一飞, 王之倩, 李敏, 柳俊, 詹维伟,. 自建评分法评估前列腺特异性抗原值在灰区者的前列腺癌风险[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 314-318. |
[3] | 陈馨, 刘莉莉, 倪靖炜, 徐刚, 权薇薇, 张智若,. 经皮冠状动脉介入术术后患者的生活质量调查及相关影响因素[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 308-313. |
[4] | 陈小英, 郑捷,. 胫前黏液性水肿严重程度和活动度评分量表的建立及实验室、超声相关指标的验证[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2020, 19(03): 243-247. |
[5] | 王涛, 邓玉, 赵萍, 于宝华, 王翔, 王朝夫,. 基于癌症基因图谱挖掘前列腺癌不同Gleason分级癌组织相关基因分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(06): 694-700. |
[6] | 王伟珅, 詹茜, 王伟, 邓侠兴, 沈柏用, 彭承宏,. 胰十二指肠切除和胰体尾切除术后胰瘘预测的研究[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2018, 23(05): 440-445. |
[7] | 姚峪岚, 郭恩伟, 任大力, 章冰玉, 杨峰, 陈庆, 刘兴晖, 罗前程, 冯刚,. 创伤患者血清白细胞介素33和可溶性抑癌蛋白2水平与创伤的程度及预后关系[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2018, 17(03): 299-303. |
[8] | 丁一, 沈至榕, 谢颖华. 校园二手书交易网站推荐引擎的设计与实现[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2017, 36(5): 148-153. |
[9] | 吴佳毅, 靳疆, 陈伟国, 丁淑宁, 林琳, 费晓春, 洪进, 高卫奇, 朱思吉, 宗瑜, 陈小松, 黄欧, 何建蓉, 朱丽, 李亚芬, 沈坤炜,. 乳腺黏液癌21基因复发风险评分与临床病理关系[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2017, 22(05): 397-400. |
[10] | 李艳秀, 左祥荣, 曹权,. 血小板计数水平对脓毒症患者的临床意义[J]. 内科理论与实践, 2017, 12(05): 351-354. |
[11] | 瞿飞麟, 陈小松, 宗瑜, 林琳, 费晓春, 何建蓉, 朱丽, 李亚芬, 沈坤炜, 陈伟国,. 乳腺癌病人的21基因复发风险评分与临床病理特征[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2017, 22(03): 240-247. |
[12] | 张荔;Mark Warschauer;盛越;. 自动写作评阅反馈系统研究述评与展望[J]. 当代外语研究, 2016, 16(06): 54-61+109. |
[13] | 沈思剑,. 本地化多项目选择的风险管理[J]. 传动技术, 2016, 30(02): 45-48. |
[14] | 许庆玲, 杨肖波, 吴超, 唐陈月, 俞丽芬,. 上海冠心病患者结肠直肠腺瘤患病率的横断面调查[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2016, 15(01): 47-52. |
[15] | 熊伟昕, 陆林, 陶蓉,. 两种方法评估2型糖尿病患者合并严重冠状动脉病变的危险因素分析[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2015, 14(03): 257-261. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||