五行之土行背后的概念隐喻和借代

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文考察体现在古代和现代汉语中的“土”概念背后的概念借代和概念隐喻,是我们对五行概念背后的认知机制所做的系列研究的一部分。语料分析显示,古汉语中的“土”背后存在概念借代“土代土的特征”、“土代土制品”、“土代土地”、“土代一定的地域”及“土代测量土地”,和概念隐喻“具有土的特征的事物/现象是土”、“一定地域内的事物/现象/人是土”、“人是土”、“土地神是土”及“历运更替是五行更替”;现代汉语中的“土”背后存在概念借代“土代土地”和“土代一定的地域”,以及概念隐喻“具有土的特征的事物/现象是土”、“一定地域内的事物/现象/人是土”、“不合潮流是土”、“文化是土壤”和“世界是土地”。古今中国人对“土”的认知机制所经历的发展变化折射出五行哲学思想体系对古代和现代中国的影响力的改变。

关键词: 五行, 土, 概念隐喻, 概念借代

Abstract: A series of studies of the cognitive mechanisms behind the Five Elements SHUI ‘Water', HUO ‘Fire', MU ‘Wood', JIN ‘Metal' and TU ‘Earth' have been done. As an integral part, this paper focuses on TU ‘Earth'. Data analyses show that the construction of the semantic network of EARTH in ancient Chinese is dominated by conceptual metonymies EARTH FOR ITS FEATURES, EARTH FOR PRODUCTS FROM EARTH, EARTH FOR LAND, EARTH FOR REGION and EARTH FOR MEASURING LAND, and by conceptual metaphors A(N) PHENOMENON/OBJECT WITH FEATURES OF EARTH IS EARTH, A(N) PERSON/OBJECT/PHENOMENON WITHIN A REGION IS EARTH, HUMAN BEING IS EARTH, GOD OF LAND IS EARTH and REPLACEMENT OF DYNASTIES IS REPLACEMENT OF THE FIVE ELEMENTS. The network of EARTH in modern Chinese is built by metonymies EARTH FOR LAND and EARTH FOR REGION, and by metaphors A(N) PHENOMENON/OBJECT WITH FEATURES OF EARTH IS EARTH, A(N) PERSON/OBJECT/PHENOMENON WITHIN A REGION IS EARTH, BEING OUT OF FASHION IS EARTH, CULTURE IS EARTH and WORLD IS EARTH. Changes of the cognitive networks of EARTH through history reflect the weakening of the influence of the Five Elements Theory.

中图分类号:

贾冬梅, 蓝纯. 五行之土行背后的概念隐喻和借代[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(01): 20-25.

JIA Dongmei, LAN Chun. Conceptual Metonymies and Metaphors behind TU "Earth" in the Five Elements[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(01): 20-25.

参考文献

Barcelona, A. 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update [A]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 207-77.
Croft, W. 2002. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies [A]. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 161-205.
Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gädenfors, P. 1996. Conceptual spaces as a framework for cognitive semantics [A]. In A. Clard (ed.). Philosophy and Cognitive Science [C]. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 159-80.Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2^nd edn.) [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. 202-51.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Radden, G. & Z. Kövecses. 1999. Toward a theory of metonymy [A]. In K. Panther & G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy In Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.17-59.
Taylor, J. 2001. Linguistics Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,.
Yu, N. 2009. The Chinese Heart in A Cognitive Perspective: Culture, Body, and Language [M]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
冯友兰.1998.中国哲学史新编(上卷)[M].北京:人民出版社.
邝芷人.1992.阴阳五行及其体系[M].台北:文津出版社.
罗竹风.2001.汉语大词典[Z].上海:汉语大词典出版社.
庞朴.1999.当代学者自选文库庞朴卷[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社.
周桂钿.2002.释“天人合一”——兼论传统价值观的现代意义及其现代转换[J].山东社会科学(1):77-81.

[1]	赵朋飞, 薛昕, 杨成. 模拟碱骨料反应引起的箍筋端部锚固退化对钢筋混凝土梁受剪性能的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 681-688.
[2]	王宁, 丁海滨, 童立红, 蒋亚龙. 基于非局部Biot理论的平面波作用下饱和地基动力响应[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(6): 663-671.
[3]	邹君, 成晓光, 于林龙. 体验哲学视阈下概念隐喻的文化模式[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021, 454(4): 119-128.
[4]	潘上, 刘谨豪, 张琪, 叶冠林. 三轴仪K₀系数测量与应力路径试验功能的研发[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2021, 55(4): 372-379.
[5]	陈盼, 向锐, 魏小棋, 韦昌富, 王吉利. 考虑土水吸附效应的黏土收缩曲线方程[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(8): 866-872.
[6]	肖朝昀, 李明广, 王大发, 陈锦剑. 降雨影响下残积土层中深基坑变形特性测试及分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(8): 873-880.
[7]	高亿文, 李明广, 陈锦剑. 超载影响下围护结构非对称基坑的受力及变形特性分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(6): 643-651.
[8]	范晓真, 许海明, 徐长节, 方焘, 谭勇. 非对称开挖砂性土基坑刚性支护结构解析解[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 397-405.
[9]	肖偲, 王奎华, 张日红, 王孟波. 静钻根植桩低应变动力响应的现场试验和数值模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(4): 406-412.
[10]	刘丽斌, 兰立信, 李明广, 叶冠林. 上海第⑧层黏土沉积环境及超固结特性[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(3): 221-226.
[11]	王亚光，廖晨聪，张琪. 地下管线在地表爆炸荷载下的位移响应与参数分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(2): 193-199.
[12]	张孟喜，马原，邱成春. 加强节点布置方式对双向土工格栅拉拔特性的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1307-1315.
[13]	胡安峰, 南博文, 陈缘, 付鹏. 基于砂土刚度衰减模型的修正p-y曲线法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(12): 1316-1323.
[14]	宋晓龙，赵维，年廷凯，焦厚滨. 水合物分解条件下海底黏土质斜坡破坏实验模拟[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 43-51.
[15]	毛继光;刘雅芳;. “抓手”与“玩转”——乔姆斯基再诠释“恐怖主义”[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020, 20(03): 93-104.