当代外语研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (08): 6-13.

• 语言学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“全民英检”高级写作纸笔与电脑化测验之平行研究初探

吴若蕙   

  1. 财团法人语言训练测验中心,台湾
  • 出版日期:2013-08-15 发布日期:2020-07-25
  • 作者简介:吴若蕙,财团法人语言训练测验中心研发长。主要研究方向为标准化语言测试发展、效度研究。电子邮箱:jw@lttc.ntu.edu.tw

A Comparability Study between Paper-based and Computer-based Test Mode of the GEPT Advanced Writing Test

Jessica R. W. Wu   

  • Online:2013-08-15 Published:2020-07-25

摘要: 语言训练测验中心研发办理的“全民英语能力分级检定测验”(简称“全民英检”)自2010年起实施“全民英检”高级电脑化写作测验,提供受测者在原有传统纸笔测验外之另一选择。但是在纸笔测验与电脑化测验双轨并行时,即使是考题一样、测试时间相同,受测者在两种不同应考环境下的表现是否相当?对评分者是否造成影响?这些问题须透过纸笔与电脑化测验的平行研究(comparability studies)来解答。本研究探讨“全民英检”高级写作纸笔与电脑化测验是否平行,比较受测者在两种测验模式下的表现,含受测者分数(score comparability)与受测者文本分析(textual and linguistic features)。结果显示两测验的结果相当、两者并存是可行的,但仍须收集更多受测者作答资料、持续进行研究,以确保两测验具有相同的效度、品质。

关键词: 全民英检, 写作测验, 评分, 电脑化测验, 平行研究, 文本分析

Abstract: Onscreen marking (OSM), as one of the emerging marking mediums, can perform an important role in improving marking quality and reducing marking errors. The current paper lays out the uptake of OSM worldwide and outlines a series of validation studies conducted for the English subject of Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (HKCEE) with the support of the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (HKEAA). Results of the validation studies showed that (1) scores obtained from OSM were statistically comparable to those from paper-based marking (PBM); (2) OSM did not affect candidates' scores, with candidates receiving comparable scores in either OSM or PBM; (3) markers' attitudes towards OSM were overall positive. The paper ends with some observations regarding further avenues for investigation into the effectiveness and applicability of OSM, providing implications for the use of OSM in other contexts.

中图分类号: