基于DCT多媒体环境下的口语语块输出研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 语块输出能力与口语交际能力高度相关。本文基于双重编码理论(Dual Coding Theory,DCT),研究多媒体环境辅助的口语语块输出。通过对比分析实验组和对照组学生不同教学环境的试验结果,同时以语料分析法为基础对比分析受试不同阶段的口语语料,综合统计出口语成绩和语块输出的变化情况。结果显示:(1)二语口语测试成绩均有改善,两阶段实验组成绩均优于对照组,且实验组四个月成绩优于两个月成绩;(2)受试口语语块输出个数、频数、多样性和长度均有提高,且实验组四指标提高均显著,对照组只有前两个指标提高显著。这项研究探究了如何更好地运用双重编码理论指导学生熟练掌握英语口语,提升口语语块输出能力,进而成功提升二语学习者的口语交际能力,为口语课堂教学和学习策略研究等提供参考。

关键词: 双重编码理论, 多媒体学习, 语块

Abstract: External supervisor system is a crucial part of MTI quality control. Based on the practical experience of MTI program management at a university in Shanghai, this paper discusses some problems in the current management system, including the qualification of prospective applicants, their academic ranks and titles, performance assessment and coordination between internal and external supervisors, and attempts to propose strategies and suggestions for comprehensive management mechanism. It is proposed that each training program set up a corresponding management model covering the selection of qualified candidates, training plans, regular meetings, and performance assessment in accordance with its own situations and the guidelines of National Supervisory Committee for MTI Education.

中图分类号:

H319

丰俊超. 基于DCT多媒体环境下的口语语块输出研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2013, 13(10): 38-42.

FENG Junchao. A Study of Chinese EFL Learners' Oral Chunk-output on the Basis of Dual Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(10): 38-42.

参考文献

Conklin, K. & N. Schmitt. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than non-formulaic language by native and non-native speakers [J]. Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72-89.
Ellis, N. 2003. Construction, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure [A]. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Goodman, K. S. 1986. What's Whole about Whole Language? A Parent/ Teacher Guide to Children's Learning [M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Jiang, N. & T.M. Nekrasova. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers [J]. Modern Language Journal 91(3): 433-45.
Kormos, J. 2006. Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition [M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. 1997. The Comprehensible Hypothesis: Recent evidence [J]. English Teachers' Journal 51(12): 17-29.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. From Intention to Articulation [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levis, J. M. 2006. Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language [A]. In R. Hughes (ed.). Spoken English, TESOL and Applied Linguistics: Challenges for Theory and Practice [C]. Basingstok: Palgrave Macmil.
Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. 2002. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning [J]. Education Psychology Review 14(1): 87-99.
Met, M. 1991. Learning language through content [J]. Foreign Language Annals 24(4): 281-95.
Myles, F. R. Mitchell & J. Hooper. 1999. Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(5): 44-52.
Nittingger, J. R. &J. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pawley, A & F. H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency [A]. In J. C. Richards &R. W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and Communication [C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 317-31.
Raupach, M. 1984. Formulaic in second language speech production [A]. In H. W. Dechert, D. Mohle & M. Raupach (eds.). Second Language Production [C]. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 114-37.
Schmitt, N. & R. Carter. 2004. Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction [A]. In N. Schmitt (ed.). Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1-22.
Segalowitz, N. 2000. Automaticity and attention skill in fluent performance [A]. In H. Riggenbach (ed.). Perspectives on Fluency [C]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Skehan, P.1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spottl, C. & M. Mccarthy. 2004. Comparing the knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3 and L4 [A]. In N. Schmitt (ed.). Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 191-225
Wood, D. 2006. Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 13-33.
Wood, D. 2007. Mastering the English formulaic: Fluency development of Japanese learners in a study abroad context [J]. JALT Journal 29(2): 87-101.
Wray, A. & M. R. Perkins. 2000. The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model [J]. Language & Communication 20(2): 176-94.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
丁言仁、戚焱.2005.词块运用与英语口语和写作水平的相关研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报(3):49-53.
樊建华、金志成.2006.认知负荷理论与多媒体学习软件[J].中国电化教育(8):86-88.
刘儒德、赵妍.2007.多媒体学习的影响因素[J].中国电化教育(10):1-5.
王小明.2008.多媒体学习与多媒体设计:认知观点[J].全球教育展望(2):42-46.
卫乃兴.2007.中国学生英语口语的短语学特征研究[J].现代外语(3):280-91.

[1]	王颖;. 语料库、语块与大学英语视听说主题教学[J]. 当代外语研究, 2012, 12(06): 41-44+77.
[2]	管新潮;胡开宝;张冠男;. 英汉医学平行语料库的创建与初始应用研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2011, 11(09): 36-41+61.