语言哲学

隐喻的现象论解释

展开
  • 暨南大学,广州,510632
梁瑞清,暨南大学外国语学院副教授、硕士生导师、博士。主要研究方向为语言哲学、语用学。电子邮箱:john_lrq@163.com

网络出版日期: 2020-07-25

基金资助

*2012年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“分析哲学视域下感觉词汇的认知语义研究”(编号12BYY119)、2011年度教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金项目“语言交流与言不尽意之关系研究”(编号2011-1139)、2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“三维意义整体论:先验、构成与生成”(编号11YJA740086)的阶段性成果。

Metaphor: A Phenomenal Perspective

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

摘要

生成和理解是隐喻的两大机制,但传统的隐喻观并未能提供一个统一的理论框架来同时解释这两个问题。基于心智哲学有关感觉经验的物理属性和现象属性的区分,本文提出了隐喻的现象论,认为隐喻的生成和理解主要取决于说话人和听话人对本体和喻体现象属性的相似性认知,而且喻体投射到本体的现象属性通常是在特定的语境中比较凸显的典型的那部分属性,从而避免了彻底的相对主义。

本文引用格式

梁瑞清 . 隐喻的现象论解释[J]. 当代外语研究, 2014 , 14(06) : 77 -83 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.06.011

Abstract

Metaphor involves two mechanisms, i.e. production mechanism and understanding mechanism, and yet traditional theories of metaphor failed to provide a uniform theoretical framework to address both of them. Based on the distinction in the philosophy of mind between physical and phenomenal properties of sensory experience, this paper advances the phenomenal account of metaphor, arguing that the production and understanding of metaphor depends primarily on speaker’s and hearer’s similarity cognition of the phenomenal properties of both the tenor and the vehicle. It is further argued that the phenomenal properties projected from the tenor to the vehicle are more often than not those salient and stereotypical in a certain context, which helps to avoid radical relativism.

参考文献

Black, M. 1993. More about metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 19-41.
Chalmers, D. J. 2004. Phenomenal concepts and the knowledge argument [A]. In P. Ludlow, D. Stoljar & Y. Nagasawa (eds.). There’s Something about Mary [C]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Davidson, D. 2012. What metaphors mean [A].霍永寿编.西方语言哲学入门必读(下卷)[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Frege, G. 1960. On sense and reference [A]. In P. Geach & M. Black (eds.). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (2nd ed.) [C]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 56-78.
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd edition) [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993.The contemporary theory of metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-251.
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Russell, B. 2010. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Searle, J. R. 1993. Metaphor [A]. In A. Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 83-111.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.) [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte trans.) [M]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Yu, N. 1998. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
金岳霖.1990.金岳霖学术论文选[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.
梁瑞清.2012a.再论感觉词汇及其现象意义[J].现代外语(3):254-260.
梁瑞清.2012b.咖啡的芳香:语言、经验与意义[M].西安:世界图书出版公司.
梁瑞清.2013.试论现象意义的多模态习得[J].外语与外语教学(5):22-25.
廖巧云、徐盛桓.2012.心智怎样计算隐喻[J].外国语(3):46-52.
钱冠连.2003.语言哲学修辞论[J].福建师范大学学报(6):20-24.
束定芳.2000.隐喻学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
束定芳.2002.论隐喻的运作机制[J].外语教学与研究(2):98-106.
谢竞贤.2011.多模态视角下的隐喻[J].外语学刊(5):49-52.
徐盛桓.2009.外延内涵传承说[J].外国语(3):2-9.
徐盛桓.2010.“A是B”的启示——再谈外延内涵传承说[J].中国外语(5):22-29.
文章导航

/