文学趣味论作为西方文学发展史的文化动因之一,总是服膺于“寓教于乐”和“文以载道”的经世哲学。阅读趣味造就当下英国文学市场的繁荣现状,与之形成反讽的则是英国学界对此问题的集体失语。凯瑟琳·贝尔西以文学趣味论的文化唯物论视角,联系当下英国文学界的种种不良现象,在梳理“被忽视的趣味传统”的基础上考察文学趣味和阅读品的深层动因,在“作为文化史的文学批评”的基础上展望趣味问题的突围道路。本文聚焦贝尔西的理论新作《批评的前景》,考辨其文学趣味论的观念体系,反思学院派文学批评的现实困境和理论前景。
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). 2009. Leading the World: The Economic Impact of UK Arts and Humanities Research [EB/OL]. http:∥www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/Publications/Documents/Leading-the-World.pdf.
Barthes, R. 1976. The Pleasure of Text (Richard Miller trans.) [M]. London: Cape.
Belsey, C. 1980. Critical Practice [M]. London: Routledge.
Belsey, C. 1989. Towards cultural history in theory and practice [J]. Textual Practice (3): 159-68.
Belsey, C. 2002. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belsey, C. 2003. From Cultural Studies to Cultural Criticism, Interrogating Cultural Studies: Theory, Politics and Practice (Paul Bowman ed.) [C]. London: Pluto Press.
Belsey, C. 2005. Culture and the Real [M]. London: Routledge.
Belsey, C. 2008. Shakespeare in Theory and Practice [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Belsey, C. 2011. The Future of Criticism [M]. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bloom, H. 1994. The Western Cannon: The Books and School of Ages [M]. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Culler, J. 1988. Framing the Sign: Criticism and Institutions [M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Spivak, G. C. 2003. Death of a Discipline [M]. New York: Columbia University Press.
哈罗德·布鲁姆.2005.西方正典(江宁康译)[M].南京:译林出版社.
王进.2009.新历史主义与文化唯物主义的异同[J].新华文摘(13):164.
童庆炳.2002.新理性精神与文化诗学[J].东南学术(2):45-47.
