文章首先回顾了50余年来学术英语写作研究的发展演变,发现近年来学术英语写作研究逐渐由关注写作者的语言技能向关注语言社团社会化、语言与学科内容相整合的方向发展;写作者的读写实践经历与社会文化语境越来越受到关注,“学术读写素养”范式应运而生。文章重点讨论了“学术读写素养”范式产生的背景、理论基础及其教学启示,据此提出了学术英语写作课程的设计原则。同时,结合我国大学英语教学实际,举例讨论了该范式的实际应用。文章认为,“学术读写素养”范式提倡语言技能与学科内容相结合,关注写作实践,对我国高校的学术英语写作教学具有重要的启示意义。
Through a critical review of the English academic writing research over the past 50 years, this article indicated that studies on English academic writing have witnessed a gradual paradigm shift from focus on the language skills to the linguistic community socialization, and the integration of language and disciplinary subject matter in recent years. Consequently, in academic writing research field writers' personal literacy practices and social culture context have gained more attention, which resulted in the emergence of “Academic Literacies” paradigm. Then, this article reviews the current trend of academic literacies paradigm on its background, rationale and pedagogy. Based on the discussion of academic literacies, this article proposes the principles on the application of such paradigm in academic writing. Then the article provides an example on its application in writing practice. This article points out that academic literacies paradigm promotes the integration of language skills with disciplinary content knowledge, which has important implications on the academic writing course design at the tertiary level in China.
Bacha, N. 2002. Developing learners' academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform [J]. Language and Education (3):161-77.
Belcher, D & G. Braine. 1995. Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy [M]. New Jersey: Ablex.
Benesch, S. 2009. Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(2): 81-85.
Bhatia, V. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre based View [M]. London: Continuum.
Canagarajah, S. 2002. Multilingual writers and the academic community: Towards a critical relationship [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1(1): 29-44.
Coffin, C. & J. P. Donohue. 2012. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate? [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(1): 64-75.
Craig, J. L. 2013. Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Contexts [M]. New York: Routledge.
Dornyei, Z. 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Draper, R. J. 2008. Redefining content area literacy teacher education: Finding my voice through collaboration [J]. Harvard Educational Review 78(1): 60-83.
Duff, P. A. 2010. Language socialization into academic discourse communities [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 169-92.
Enright, K. A. 2010. Academic literacies and adolescent learners: English for subject matter secondary classrooms [J]. TESOL Quarterly 44(4): 804-10.
Fang, Z. & M. J. Schleppegrell. 2010. Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis[J]. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53(7):587-97.
Graves, K. 1996. Teachers as Course Developers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. 1994. Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. 2002. Teaching and Researching Writing [M]. London: Pearson Education.
Jordan, R. R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lea, M. R. & B. V. Street. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach[J]. Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 157-72.
Lillis, T. 2008. Ethnography as method, methodology, and “Deep Theorizing” closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research [J]. Written Communication 25(3): 353-88.
Lillis, T.M.& M. J. Curry. 2010. Academic Writing in Global Context [M]. London: Routledge.
Lillis, T.M.& M. Scott. 2007. Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy[J]. Journal of Applied linguistics 4(1): 5-32.
Nikolarea, E. 2006. ‘Inter-scientificity' in interdisciplinary fields: A case study of an ESP course in Geography at a Greek university [J]. ESP Across Cultures 3: 66-77.
Morgan, B. 2009. Fostering transformative practitioners for critical EAP: Possibilities and challenges [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(2): 86-99.
North, S. 2005. Different values, different skills? A comparison of essay writing by students from arts and science backgrounds [J]. Studies in Higher Education 30(5): 517-33.
Schneider, B., M. Csikszentmihalyi & S. Knauth. 1995. Academic challenge, motivation, and self-esteem: The daily experiences of students in high school [A] In M. Halliman (ed.). Restructuring Schools:Promising Practices and Policies [C]. New York: Plenum Press. 175-95.
Street, B. V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. V. 1993. Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wingate, U. 2012. Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy' journey [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(1): 26-37.
Wong, M. M. & M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1991. Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience [J]. Journal of Personality 59 (3): 539-74.
教育部高等教育司. 2007.大学英语课程教学改革[S].上海:上海外语教学出版社.
韩萍、侯丽娟. 2012. 从体裁分析角度探索研究生学术英语写作能力培养[J].外语界 (6): 74-80.
盛静、韩宝成. 2011. 新读写素质研究与英语课堂教学分析. 外语教学与研究 43(2):261-72.
滕延江、刘世铸. 2006. 基于语料库的英语写作教学新模式[J].外语电化教学 (6): 49-54.
徐昉. 2015. 学术英语写作研究述评[J].外语教学与研究47(1): 94-105.
叶洪. 2014. 新读写理论与外语写作任务设计[J]. 现代外语 37(4): 525-36.
