当代外语研究

当代外语研究 >

2020 , Vol. 20 >Issue 1: 68 - 76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.01.009

语言学与应用语言学

英语写作教学的循证实践

展开
  • 上海交通大学,上海,200240
刘兴华,博士,上海交通大学外国语学院讲师。电子邮箱: liuxinghua@sjtu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2020-01-25

收起

Evidence-based Practices for Teaching and Researching of English Writing

Expand

Online published: 2020-01-25

Fold

摘要

写作是我国英语作为外语教学中的重点和难点,一直存在英语写作教学“费时低效”的现象,迫切需要我们为英语写作教学与研究找到新的有效方法。循证实践,一种基于证据的教育理念,契合当下全球教育所提倡的质量意识和责任意识,对我国英语教学与研究走向科学化有着重要的意义与价值。本文基于循证实践观,系统梳理目前的英语写作教学循证实践,并结合两项实证研究,详细阐释运用元分析法提炼有效写作教学证据以及采用随机对照实验开展写作教学研究的方法和步骤。本文对一线英语教师的课堂教学以及教育管理者都有较强的借鉴意义。

关键词： 写作教学与研究; 循证实践; 元分析; 随机对照实验

本文引用格式

刘兴华 . 英语写作教学的循证实践[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020 , 20(1) : 68 -76 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.01.009

参考文献

[1] Aitken, A., A. Barkel, A.B. Ray, J.D. Houston, X. Liu, C. P. Kavanagh, K.R. Harris & S. Graham. 2017. Super-duper fun: Close reading for persuasive writing for 5th - 6th grade[R]. Presentation at Annual Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) Convention & Expo, Boston, MA.
[2] Anwaruddin, S. M. 2016. Language teachers’ responses to educational research: addressing the ‘crisis’ of representation[J]. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 39(3): 314-328.
[3] Graham, S. & K.R. Harris. 2014. Conducting high quality writing intervention research: Twelve recommendations[J]. Journal of Writing Research 6(2): 89-123.
[4] Graham, S., K. R. Harris & A.B. Ray. 2016. Evidence-based practice and writing instruction. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (eds.). Handbook of Writing Research (2nd edn.)[C].211-226.
[5] Graham, S., X. Liu, A. Aitken, C. Ng, B. Bartlett, K.R. Harris & J. Holzapfel. 2017. Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis[J]. Reading Research Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
[6] Hargreaves, D. 1996. Teaching as a Research-based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects[R]. The Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London.
[7] Harris, K.R. & S. Graham. 2009. Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Premises, evolution, and the future[J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology (6): 113-136.
[8] Hillocks, G. 1986. Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching[M]. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
[9] Lipsey, M.W. & D.B. Wilson. 2001. Practical Meta-analysis[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[10] Liu, X. 2017. Writing instruction, writing research, and educational psychology: An interview with Steve Graham[J]. Educational Psychology Review 29(1): 175-187.
[11] Liu, X. 2019. Writing research, writing instruction and educational research frontiers and methodology:An interview with Steve Graham[J]. International Journal of TESOL studies 1(1): 102-116.
[12] Sackett, D. L., W. M. C. Rosenberg, J.A.M. Gray, R.B. Haynes & W.S. Richardson. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t[J]. British Medical Journal 312: 3-5.
[13] Wiseman, A. W. & A. Tsui. 2010. The uses of evidence for educational policymaking: Global contexts and international trends[J]. Review of Research in Education 34(1): 1-24.
[14] 刘桂秋. 2008. 有效教学概念新探--综合有效教学观之下的有效教学[J]. 课程.教材.教法(9): 11-15,44.
[15] 文秋芳. 2017. “产出导向法”的中国特色[J]. 现代外语(3): 348-358,438.
[16] 杨文登、 叶浩生. 2012. 社会科学的三次“科学化”浪潮:从实证研究、社会技术到循证实践[J]. 社会科学(8): 107-116.
[17] 俞可、 陈丹、 赵帅. 2017. 循证:欧盟教育实证研究新趋向[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)(3): 142-149,173-174.
[18] 袁振国. 2017. 中国教育需要实证研究[J]. 中国教育学刊(2): 3.
[19] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2007. 大学英语课程教学要求[S]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[20] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2011. 义务教育英语课程标准[S]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[21] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2003. 普通高中英语课程标准(实验)[S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[22] 周加仙. 2016. 基于证据的教育决策与实践:教育神经科学的贡献[J]全球教育展望(8): 90-101.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉