当代外语研究

当代外语研究 >

2020 , Vol. 20 >Issue 2: 52 - 60

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.02.008

外语教育

网络环境下的同伴互动:研究与反思

展开
  • 华中科技大学,武汉,430074
徐锦芬,博士,华中科技大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为二语习得、外语教育、教师发展。电子邮箱: xujinfen@hust.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2020-02-25

收起

Online Peer Interactions: Research and Reflection

Expand

Online published: 2020-02-25

Fold

摘要

网络同伴互动已成为网络外语教学不可或缺的一个重要组成部分,近年来相关实践与研究日益增多。本文通过梳理近20年来的网络同伴互动研究文献,从网络同伴互动的性质、模式、影响因素和有效性四个方面进行了总结和论述。具体来讲,研究者通过对比分析网络环境下和面对面同伴互动的异同来描述同伴互动的性质和模式,发现任务相关因素和学习者个体差异是影响网络同伴互动的重要因素;从网络同伴互动的有效性的角度肯定了网络同伴互动对外语学习的促进作用。文章最后指出,未来网络同伴互动实践与研究可以重点关注互动方式和互动设计两大方面。

关键词： 网络教学; 网络同伴互动; 互动模式; 互动设计

本文引用格式

徐锦芬 . 网络环境下的同伴互动:研究与反思[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020 , 20(2) : 52 -60 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.02.008

参考文献

[1] Akiyama, Y. 2017. Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation[J]. System 64:58-73.
[2] Arnold, N., L. Ducate & C. Kost. 2012. Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision process in wikis[J]. CALICO Journal 29(3):431-448.
[3] Avgousti, M. I. 2018. Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: A systematic review[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31(8):819-853.
[4] Baralt, M. & L. Gurzynski-Weiss. 2011. Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication[J]. Language Teaching Research 15(2):201-229.
[5] Baralt, M., L. Gurzynski-Weiss & Y. Kim. 2016. Engagement with the language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form[A]. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (eds.). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda[C]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 209-239.
[6] Barrs, K. 2012. Fostering computer-mediated L2 interaction beyond the classroom[J]. Language Learning & Technology 16(1):10-25.
[7] Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. 2011. Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(5):419-432.
[8] Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. 2013. Interactional feedback in synchronous voice-based computer mediated communication: Effect of dyad[J]. System 41(3):543-559.
[9] Cho, H. 2017. Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 36:37-51.
[10] Chun, D., R. Kern & B. Smith. 2016. Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning[J]. The Modern Language Journal 100(S1):64-80.
[11] Darhower, M. 2002. Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study[J]. CALICO Journal 19(2):249-277.
[12] DiGiovanni, E. & G. Nagaswami. 2001. Online peer review: An alternative to face-to-face?[J] ELT Journal 55(3):263-272.
[13] Gass, S., A. Mackey & L. Ross-Feldman. 2011. Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings[J]. Language Learning 61(S1):189-220.
[14] Hsieh, Y. C. 2017. A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30(1-2):115-132.
[15] Hsu, H. C. 2019. Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 32(7):1-23.
[16] Hsu H. C. & Y. F. Lo. 2018. Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance[J]. Language Learning & Technology 22(3):103-123.
[17] Jauregi, K., R. De Graaff., V. D. B. Huub & M. Kriz. 2012. Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation?[J] Computer Assisted Language Learning 25(1):1-19.
[18] Li, M. & W. Zhu. 2013. Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(1):61-82.
[19] Li, M. & W. Zhu. 2017a. Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing[J]. Language Learning & Technology 21(2):96-120.
[20] Li, M. & W. Zhu. 2017b. Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 35(1):38-53.
[21] Lin, H. 2014. Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication and SLA: A meta-analysis[J]. Language Learning & Technology 18(3):120-147.
[22] O’Dowd, R. 2011. Online foreign language interaction: moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education?[J] Language Teaching 44(3):368-380.
[23] Peeters, W. 2018. Applying the networking power of Web 2.0 to the foreign language classroom: A taxonomy of the online peer interaction process[J]. Computer Assisted Language Learning 31(8):905-931.
[24] Rouhshad, A., G. Wigglesworth & N. Storch.. 2016. The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions[J]. Language Teaching Research 20(4):514-534.
[25] Saeed M. A. & K. Ghazali. 2017. Asynchronous group review of EFL writing: Interactions and text revisions[J]. Language Learning & Technology 21(2):200-226.
[26] Saito, K.. & Y. Akiyama. 2017. Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study[J]. Language Learning 67(1):43-74.
[27] Satar H. M. & N. Özdener. 2008. The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat[J]. The Modern Language Journal 92(4):595-613.
[28] Smith, B. 2003. Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model[J]. The Modern Language Journal 87(1):38-57.
[29] Tang Y. & K. F. Hew. 2017. Using twitter for education: Beneficial or simply a waste of time?[J] Computers & Education 106:97-118.
[30] Van der Zwaard, R. & A. Bannink. 2014. Video call or chat? Negotiation of meaning and issues of face in telecollaboration[J]. System 44:137-148.
[31] Warschauer, M. 1997. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice[J]. The Modern Language Journal 81(4):470-481.
[32] Yamada, M. 2009. The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study[J]. Computers & Education 52:820-833.
[33] Yanguas, I. 2010. Oral computer-mediated interaction between l2 learners: It’s about time![J]. Language Learning & Technology 14(3):72-93.
[34] Yilmaz, Y. 2011. Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication[J]. The Modern Language Journal 95(1):115-132.
[35] Zeng, G. & S. Takatsuka. 2009. Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in acomputer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context[J]. System 37(3):434-446.
[36] Ziegler, N. 2016. Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(3):553-586.
[37] 吴诗玉、 黄绍强. 2019. 何为“有效”的外语教学——根植于本土教学环境和教学对象特点的思考[J]. 当代外语研究(3):37-47.
[38] 徐锦芬、 刘文波. 2019. 信息技术背景下的外语创新教学与研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(5): 1-9+147.
[39] 张秀芹、 贺玉珍. 2018. 网络实时文本交际互动中的同伴支架研究——与课堂互动比较[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(4):96-102.
[40] 郑佩芸. 2011. 不同英语水平对子组合的语言输出和互动模式研究——基于网络书面实时交流的实证探索[J]. 外语界(3):60-67.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉