POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching
陶继芬 . POA“读说”模式英语口语课堂教学设计[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021 , 21(3) : 96 -103 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2021.03.010
From the perspective of teaching research, this paper demonstrates a practical and operational teaching model for English speaking class based on Production-oriented Approach. Taking into consideration the uniqueness of Chinese language learner, the overall teaching design successfully realized the “student-centered” concept of POA by creatively applying the “reading and speaking” approach in speaking class. Each teaching process is designed to improve students' willingness to communicate in L2. The students' feedback shows that the POA-based “Reading and Speaking” approach to oral English teaching can effectively improve the students' willingness to communicate with each other, and the classroom teaching can achieve the expected effect.
| [1] | Cao, Y., & J. Philp. 2006. Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class,group and dyadic interaction[J]. System 34:480-493. |
| [2] | Goh M., & A. Burns. 2012. Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach[M]. London: Cambridge University Press. |
| [3] | Harmer, J. 2000. How to Teach English[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. |
| [4] | Horwitz K., B.Horwitz & A.Cope. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety[J]. The Modern Language Journal 70(2):125-132. |
| [5] | Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypobook: Issues and Implications[M]. London: Longman. |
| [6] | MacIntyre D., R. Clement, Z. Domyei, & A. Noels, 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidencee and affiliation[J]. The Modern Language Journal 82:545-562. |
| [7] | Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue[A].In J.Lantolf (ed.).Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning[C]. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press.97-114. |
| [8] | 高频. 2018. 基于POA理论的大学英语翻转课堂教学模式实证研究——以听说教学为例[J]. 电化教育研究 (12):102-107. |
| [9] | 高频, 何其莘, 黄源深, 秦秀白, 陈建平. 2008. 近三十年来我国高校英语专业教学回顾与展望[J]. 外语教学与研究 (11):427-432. |
| [10] | 何暄. 2013. 任务型教学影响大学生英语课堂口语交际意愿的实验研究[J]. 中国成人教育 (7):140-142. |
| [11] | 胡越竹. 2016. 外语焦虑与交际意愿个体差异实证研究[J]. 外语电化教学 (6):9-14, 21. |
| [12] | 林殿芳, 王俊菊. 2018. 影响学生课堂交际意愿的教师因素研究[J]. 外语教学 (4):59-64. |
| [13] | 吕林海, 张红霞, 李婉芹, 万东升. 2015. 中国学生的保守课堂学习行为及其与中庸思维、批判性思维等的关系[J]. 远程教育杂志 (5):54-63. |
| [14] | 彭剑娥. 2008. 文化视觉下大学生英语交际意愿的实证研究[J]. 语言教学与研究 (6):30-36. |
| [15] | 邱琳. 2017. “产出导向法”语言促成环节过程化设计研究[J]. 现代外语 (3):386-396. |
| [16] | 芮燕萍, 冀慧君. 2017. 多模态听说教学对口语焦虑与课堂沉默的影响[J]. 外语电化教学 (12):50-55. |
| [17] | 孙曙光. 2017. “师生合作评价”课堂反思性实践研究[J]. 现代外语 (3):397-406. |
| [18] | 王初明. 2014. 内容要创造语言要模仿——有效外语教学和学习的基本思路[J]. 外语界 (2):42-48. |
| [19] | 文秋芳. 2001. 从全国英语专业四级口试看口语教学[J]. 外语界 (1):4-8. |
| [20] | 文秋芳. 2015. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究 (4):547-558. |
| [21] | 吴旭东. 2008. 中国学生外语学习环境下的口头交际能力自评与交际意愿[J]. 现代外语 (3):280-290,329. |
| [22] | 武小莉. 2011. 图式理论研究对口语输出的启示[J]. 湖南科技学院学报 (2):162-165. |
| [23] | 谢都全, 郭应可. 2011. 中国非英语专业大学生交际意愿结构方程建模分析[J]. 外国语文 (5):116-123. |
| [24] | 杨莉芳. 2015. 产出导向法“驱动”环节的微课设计——以《新一代大学英语综合教程2》“艺术与自然”单元为例[J]. 中国外语教育 (4):3-9. |
| [25] | 姚晓东, 秦亚勋. 2018. 交往中的合作期待与信任[J]. 现代外语 (3):344-353. |
| [26] | 张伶俐. 2017. “产出导向法”的教学有效性研究[J]. 现代外语 (3):369-376. |
| [27] | 张文娟. 2015. 学以致用、用以促学——产出导向法“促成”环节的课堂教学尝试[J]. 中国外语教育 (4):10-17. |
| [28] | 张文娟. 2016. 基于“产出导向法”的大学英语课堂教学实验[J]. 外语与外语教学 (2):106-114. |
| [29] | 张文娟. 2017. “产出导向法”对大学英语写作影响的实验研究[J]. 现代外语 (3):377-385. |
| [30] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 2016. 关于深化高校教师考核评价制度改革的指导意见[EB/OL]. [2016-08-29]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201609/t20160920_281586.html. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
