语言研究

新一代可视化语料库软件#LancsBox的核心功能和应用前景

展开
  • 华中科技大学,武汉,430074

网络出版日期: 2021-10-26

基金资助

* 本文系2014年国家社科基金一般项目“基于大型赋码语料库的中国学者英语学术论文诊断性研究”的阶段性成果(14BYY148);衷心感谢兰卡斯特大学Vaclav Brezina在#LancsBox软件使用方面给予的悉心指导

The Core Function and Application Prospects of the New Generation of Visualization Corpus Software #LancsBox

Expand

Online published: 2021-10-26

摘要

随着语料库语言学的发展,研究者对语料库软件的功能需求也日益多元化,然而主流语料库软件目前还不能完全满足多层次的研究需求。新一代可视化语料库软件#LancsBox可读取多语种多格式语料,具有强大检索和统计功能,支持智能检索和基于词类的精细化检索。其核心功能“搭配图解”突破了主流语料库软件只能提取搭配词对的限制,通过多层次拓展搭配网络,揭示传统搭配方法难以展现的搭配关系。鉴于国内外相关研究为数不多,文章以研究实例展示了#LancsBox的特色及核心功能,并在梳理软件相关研究的基础上展望了#LancsBox在话语分析、词汇语法研究和语言习得等研究领域中的应用前景。

本文引用格式

王靓婧, 潘璠 . 新一代可视化语料库软件#LancsBox的核心功能和应用前景[J]. 当代外语研究, 2020 , 20(5) : 77 -90 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2020.05.009

Abstract

With the development of corpus linguistics, researchers have more diversified needs for the functions of corpus software, which have not been fully supported by mainstream corpus softwares. The new generation visualization corpus software #LancsBox supports a wide range of languages and multiple forms of texts, possesses powerful retrieval and statistical functions, and allows smart searches and advanced filter based on word class. By expanding multi layered collocation network, its core module “GraphColl” breaks the limit of extracting collocation between word pairs and reveals complex collocation relationships between multiple words, which cannot be accessed by the traditional collocation approach. Given very limited existing studies using #LancsBox at home and abroad, this paper demonstrates its unique advantages and core functions with case studies. By reviewing relevant studies, this paper analyzes its application prospects in the fields of discourse analysis, lexical grammar research, and language acquisition

参考文献

[1] Baker, P. 2016. The shapes of collocation[J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (2):139-164.
[2] Baker, P. & T. McEnery. 2015. Who benefits when discourse gets democratized? Analysing a Twitter corpus around the British Benefits Street debate [A]. In P. Baker & T. McEnery (eds.). Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora [C]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 244-265.
[3] Baker, V. 2016. Collocation networks [A]. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (eds.). Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research [C]. New York: Routledge. 90-107.
[4] Baker, V. 2018. Collocation graphs and networks: Selected applications [A]. In P. Cantos-Gómez & M. Almela-Sánchez (eds.). Lexica Collocation Analysis. Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences [C]. Cham: Springer 59-82.
[5] Brezina, V., T. McEnery & S. Wattam. 2015. Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks[J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2):139-173.
[6] Brezina, V., M. Timperley & T. McEnery. 2018. #LancsBox v. 4.x. [software package].
[7] Caimotto, M. C. 2020. Discourses of Cycling, Road Users and Sustainability: An Ecolinguistic Investigation[M]. Springer Nature.
[8] Cheng, W. 2012. Exploring Corpus Linguistics: Language in Action[M]. New York: Routledge.
[9] Dong, J. & L. Buckingham. 2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases[J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36(6):119-131.
[10] Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language[M]. New York: Routledge.
[11] Hunston S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[12] Hunston, S & G. Francis. 2000. Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[13] Germond, B & F. W. Ha. 2019. Climate change and maritime security narrative: The case of the international maritime organisation[J]. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 9(1):1-12.
[14] Lakoff, G & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[15] Lillqvist, Lillqvist, & A. A. Harju. 2018. Discourse of enticement: How Facebook solicits users[J]. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 10(1):63-80.
[16] McEnery T. 2006 Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present[M]. Abington, UK: Routledge.
[17] Marín, M. J. 2017. Legalese as seen through the lens of corpus linguistics: An introduction to software tools for terminological analysis[J]. International Journal of Language & Law (JLL) 6:18-45.
[18] Sinclair, J. M. 2004. Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse[M]. London: Routledge.
[19] 郭静思、 郑洁、 刘玉洁. 2020. 基于语料库的冤假错案英语新闻报道的实例化研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版)(4):138-146.
[20] 李琳、 王立非、 刘智洋. 2019. 基于Lancsbox的标准化本体知识词义网络特征描写与分析[J]. 中国标准化 17:51-61.
[21] 柳超健、 王军. 2017. 基于语义标注工具Wmatrix的隐喻识别研究[J]. 外语电化教学(2):15-21.
[22] 刘美君、 杨佳铭. 2020. 陶瓷文本中特殊的修辞策略[J]. 当代修辞学(2):24-35.
[23] 许家金、 贾云龙. 2013. 基于R-gram的语料库分析软件PowerConc的设计与开发[J]. 外语电化教学(1):57-62.
文章导航

/