语言学与应用语言学

德国高中生心目中的中国形象及其成因

展开
  • 浙江外国语学院,杭州,310023
洪岗,浙江外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为跨文化语用学、应用语言学、话语分析。电子邮箱:honggang@zisu.edu.cn;|吴卫东,浙江外国语学院德国研究中心执行主任、教授。主要研究方向为德国研究、教师教育;|程静,浙江外国语学院德国研究中心副主任。主要研究方向为德国研究、翻译研究;|咸佩心,浙江外国语学院德国研究中心兼职研究员。主要研究方向为德国语言文化。

网络出版日期: 2023-07-31

基金资助

*2019年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划一般课题“中国形象的异国建构——以德国教科书切入”(编号19NDJC273YB)

A Study on the Construction of China’s Image by German Senior Middle School Students

Expand

Online published: 2023-07-31

摘要

本文以博尔丁的国家形象理论框架为基础,通过调查问卷,对德国高中生心目中的中国形象及其成因、德国中学教育对德国中学生“中国形象”建构所起的作用等问题进行研究。研究发现,德国高中生有清晰的地理、物理及心理三个层面的中国形象,学校教育对其中国形象的构建起关键性作用,其次是大众传媒,其他因素影响相对较小。研究还发现德国中学生对中国形象的建构存在错位现象,这种错位形象有其历史与心理因由。国家形象的异域构建,特别是域外青少年心中的形象构建应重点关注学校教育,尤其是相关教材和课堂教学;要展现真实、立体、全面的中国形象需拓宽异域构建的途径。

本文引用格式

洪岗, 吴卫东, 程静, 咸佩心 . 德国高中生心目中的中国形象及其成因[J]. 当代外语研究, 2023 , 23(3) : 90 -102 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.03.011

Abstract

Based on Boulding’s theoretical framework of image theory and information collected through a questionnaire, this paper explores German high school students’image of China, including what the image is like, how the image is constructed and what role school education plays in the construction of this image. Results show that German high school students have clear geographic, physical and psychological images of China. The main factors that influence their construction of China’s image are first and foremost formal school education and then mass media. Other factors are rarely mentioned by students in the survey. The results also show that German high school students have mismatched image of China due to historical and psychological reasons. We believe that in the construction of China’s image, particularly among young people in other countries, attention should be focused on formal school education, especially course material development and classroom teaching. In addition, more approaches should be taken in order to present a true, multidimensional and panoramic view of China to the world. Relevant suggestions were presented at the end of the article.

参考文献

[1] Boulding, K. E. 1959. National images and international systems[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution (6): 122-131.
[2] David, O. & D. Bar-Tal. 2009. A socio-psychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity as an example[J]. Personality & Social Psychology Review (4): 354-379.
[3] Holsti, O. R. 1962. The belief system and national image: A case study[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution (9): 244-252.
[4] Jarvis, R. 1989. The Logic of Image in International Relations[M]. New York: Columbia University Press.
[5] Long, Y., F. Quan & Y. Zheng. 2021. Effects of bicultural identity integration and national identity on COVID-19-Related anxiety among ethnic minority college students: The mediation role of Power Values[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 14: 239-249.
[6] Lopez, C., M. Gots & C. Andriopoulos. 2011. Conceptualising the influence of corporate image on country image[J]. European Journal of Marketing 11/12: 1601-1641.
[7] Nikitina, L. 2016. Language learners’ representations of Portugal: Implications for culture teaching[J]. Culture and Education (4): 863-879.
[8] Roth, K. P. & A. Diamantopoulos.2009. Advancing the country image construct[J]. Journal of Business Research (7): 726-740.
[9] Rusi, A. 1988. Image research and image politics in international relations—Transformation of power politics in the television age[J]. Cooperation and Conflict 23: 29-42.
[10] Schatz, E. & R. Levine. 2010. Framing, public diplomacy, and anti-Americanism in central Asia[J]. International Studies Quarterly (3): 855-869.
[11] Shi, T., J. Lu & J. Aldrich. 2011. Bifurcated images of the U.S. in urban China and the impact of media environment[J]. Political Communication (3): 357-376.
[12] Shinabe, N. 2018. Revealing a hidden curriculum in educational discourse: A study of the representation of Europe and Asian in Spanish and Japanese school textbooks[J]. Discourse and Society (6): 1-17.
[13] White, C. L. & K. Alkandari.2019. The influence of culture and infrastructure on CSR and country image: The case of Kuwait[J]. Public Relations Review (3): 1-10.
[14] 常珊珊. 2017. “多面中国”:中国歌剧形象的“他塑”研究——以《纽约时报》2015年“中美关系”议题为例[J]. 新闻大学(3):138-145, 153.
[15] 邓禹. 2013. 广西东盟留学生对中国形象的认知与启示[J]. 东南亚研究(3):57-64.
[16] 管文虎. 2000. 国家形象论[M]. 成都: 成都科技出版社.
[17] 何伟、 高然. 2018. 新西兰媒体之中国“一带一路”倡议表征研究——以《新西兰先驱报》为例[J]. 中国外语(3):46-51.
[18] 雷默、 乔舒亚·库珀等. 2006. 中国形象:外国学者眼中的中国(沈晓蕾等译)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
[19] 刘朋. 2012. 中国形象传播的历史与变革[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社.
[20] 李正国. 2006. 国家形象建构[M]. 北京: 国传媒大学出版社.
[21] 马得勇、 陆屹洲. 2022. 国家形象形成的心理分析[J]. 国际政治科学(1):114-148.
[22] 吴友富. 2009. 中国国家形象的塑造和传播[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
[23] 习近平. 2022. 习近平谈治国理政第四卷[M]. 北京: 外文出版社.
[24] 张昆. 2005. 国家形象传播[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社.
[25] 张升芸、 刘鸿武. 2020. 喀麦隆中学历史教科书异域文化视野中的中国形象[J]. 历史教学问题(6):178-184.
[26] 周宁. 2008. 在西方现代性想象中研究中国形象[J]. 南京大学学报(4):70-78.
[27] 赵永华、 陆君钰. 2021. 新闻话语中的隐喻与国家形象的选择性建构——以《纽约时报》新冠肺炎疫情涉华报道为例[J]. 当代传播(6):17-22.
[28] 朱桂生、 黄建滨. 2016. 美国主流媒体视野中的中国“一带一路”战略——基于《华盛顿邮报》相关报道的批评性话语分析[J]. 新闻界17:58-64.
文章导航

/