国家意识

融入课程思政的混合式学术英语写作教学设计及评价

展开
  • 上海交通大学,上海, 200240
张荔,博士,上海交通大学外国语学院教授、博士生导师。主要研究方向为计算机辅助语言教学、学术英语教学。电子邮箱:zhangli@sjtu.edu.cn

网络出版日期: 2023-12-29

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学规划项目“融入课程思政的学术英语线上线下混合式教学模式探究”的阶段性研究成果(编号21YJA740051)

The Design and Evaluation of A Blended Academic English Writing Course Incorporating Ideological and Political Education

Expand

Online published: 2023-12-29

摘要

混合式教学是外语教学的热点,但鲜有在混合式学术英语课程中融入课程思政的教学实践和研究。本研究从教学目标、教学内容、教学方法以及典型案例分析,全面展示了融入课程思政的学术英语写作混合式教学课程的设计,并采用定性和定量研究相结合的方法对教学效果加以验证。定量研究使用调查问卷了解学生对混合式教学的看法,并对课程前、后能力及素养的感知实施配对样本t检验,对学术论文初稿、二稿、终稿实施单因素方差检验。定性研究使用Canvas教学系统留言内容对定量研究结果做进一步说明。研究结果显示,学生对混合式教学比较认可,他们认为在文献阅读、论文写作和学术汇报能力以及综合素养方面均得到提升,论文终稿质量比过程稿亦有显著提高。该研究为混合式教学融入课程思政提供了一定的范式。

本文引用格式

张荔 . 融入课程思政的混合式学术英语写作教学设计及评价[J]. 当代外语研究, 2023 , 23(6) : 54 -65 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2023.06.006

Abstract

Blended teaching is a hot topic in foreign language instruction, but there is little research and practical application of incorporating ideological and political education into blended academic English courses. This study demonstrates the design of a blended academic English writing course that integrates ideological and political education in terms of teaching objectives, teaching contents, and teaching methods, with typical cases to illustrate the points. The study also combines quantitative and qualitative research methods to validate the teaching effectiveness. The quantitative research utilizes questionnaires to gain insights into students' perspectives on blended teaching. It also conducts paired sample t-test to assess students' perceptions of their abilities and overall qualities before and after the course and performs one-way ANOVA on academic paper drafts at the initial, second, and final stages. Qualitative research uses the messages left on Canvas teaching system to further explain the quantitative results. It is found that students generally approve of blended teaching. They perceived that they have not only enhanced their skills for reading literature, writing research papers, and delivering academic presentations, but also developed their overall competence. Besides, the quality of the final paper is significantly better than that of the initial drafts. This study provides a methodology for integrating ideological and political education into blended teaching.

参考文献

[1] Anderson L. W., D. R. Krathwohl P. Airasian, et al. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy[M]. New York, NY: Longman Publishing.
[2] Davin K. J. 2018. Mediator and learner engagement in co-regulated inter-psychological activity[A]. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner & M. Swain (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development[C]. New York: Routledge. 282-294.
[3] Dewey B. J. 1916. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education[J]. American Journal of Sociology 10 (1): 40-49.
[4] Johnston B. 2003. Values in English Language Teaching[M]. New York: Routledge.
[5] Keefer L. A., M. Brown, & Z. K. Rothschild, 2020. Framing plagiarism as a disease heightens students' valuation of academic integrity[J]. International Journal of Psychology (2): 210-214.
[6] Mazer J. P., S. K. Hunt, & J. H. Kuznekoff. 2008. Revising general education: Assessing a critical thinking instructional model in the basic communication course[J]. The Journal of General Education 56 (3): 173-199.
[7] Polio C. & L. Shi. 2012. Perceptions and beliefs about textual appropriation and source use in second language writing[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(2): 95-101.
[8] Shaaban K. 2005. A proposed framework for incorporating moral education into the ESL/EFL classroom[J]. Language Culture & Curriculum 18 (2): 201-217.
[9] 陈静、 陈吉颖、 郭凯. 2021. 混合式学术英语写作课堂中的学习投入研究[J]. 外语界(1): 28-36.
[10] 陈坚林、 马牧青. 2019. 信息化时代外语教学范式重构研究——理据与目标[J]. 外语电化教学(1): 12-17.
[11] 大学外语教学指导委员会. 2020. 大学英语教学指南(2020版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[12] 教育部. 2019. 教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见[EB/OL]. [2023-04-03]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5480494.htm.
[13] 教育部. 2020. 高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要[EB/OL]. [2023-04-03]. http://gd.whut.edu.cn/py/tzgg/202110/P020211018579300577933.pdf.
[14] 孟亚茹、 钱希、岳真. 2021. 通用学术英语混合式教学活动系统的评估模型构建[J]. 外语界(4): 27-34.
[15] 王奕凯、 刘兵. 2019. 研究生学术英语线上线下混合教学实践研究[J]. 外语与外语教学(5): 10-19.
[16] 文秋芳. 2015. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究(4): 547-558.
[17] 吴岩. 2021. 抓好教学“新基建” 培养高质量外语人才[EB/OL]. [2021-12-2]. http://education.news.cn/2021-12/02/c_1211471188.htm.
[18] 张荔. 2021. 学术英语写作课程中的诚信教育方法探究[J]. 外语与翻译 (3): 63-70.
[19] 张荔、 盛越. 2022. 学术英语写作与演讲[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
[20] 郑咏滟. 2019. SPOC混合式教学在英语学术写作课堂中的促学效果研究[J]. 外语电化教学(5): 50-55.
文章导航

/