The Repetition and Difference between The Scarlet Letter and The Millstone

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.01.010

Abstract

Abstract: Both The Scarlet Letter and The Millstone are classic literature works. Though comments on these two works home and abroad are countless, study with the juxtapostion of the two never occurs. This paper employs J. Hillis Miller’s Repetition Theory to juxtaposes The Scarlet Letter with The Millstone to analyse the female’s life in different historical periods. Hester in The Scarlet Letter is in effect the spokeswoman of male authority, while Rosamend in The Millstone painstakingly protests against the norms towards women set by the traditional society with the supremacy of male authority. Obviously, the former constructs a male-dominated society while the latter tries to reconstruct one free of restraint of male power through exploring the inevitable living perplexity of women seeking independence in modern society.

CLC Number:

I106.4

Hang Qingqing. The Repetition and Difference between The Scarlet Letter and The Millstone[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(01): 55-59.

References

Andrews, E. K. (ed.). 1999. Nathaniel Hawthorne: The Scarlet Letter [M]. Cambridge: Icon Books.
Colacurcio, M. J. 2006. Woman’s heart, Woman’s choice: The “history” of The Scarlet Letter [J]. Poe Studies (1-2): 104-14.
Cooper-Clark, D. 1986. Interview with Contemporary Novelists [M]. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Duyckinck, E. A.1910. Encyclopedia of American Literature [M]. New York: Henry Holt.
Elbert, M. 1990. Encoding the Letter “A”: Gender and Authority in Hawthorne’s Early Fiction [M]. Frankfurt: Haag & Herchen.
Kristeva, J. 1986. Word, dialogue and novel [A]. In Toril Moi (ed.). The Kristeva Reader [C]. New York: Columbia University Press. 34-61.
MacLean, H. N. 1955. Hawthorne’s SCARLET LETTER: The dark problem of this life [J]. American Literature (1): 12-24.
Mill, J. S. 2001.On Liberty [M]. Ontario: Batoche Books.
Miller, J. H. 2004. Fiction and Repetition: Seven English Novels [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Murfin, R. C.1991. Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism [M]. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Myer, V. G. 1974. Margaret Drabble: Puritanism and Permissiveness [M]. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Myer, V. G. 1991. Margaret Drabble: A Reader’s Guide [M]. London: Vision Press./New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Rose, E. C.1980. The Novels of Margaret Drabble: Equivocal Figures [M]. London: Macmillan.
Sadler, L. V. 1986. Margaret Drabble [M]. Boston: Twayne.
Smith, A. M. & E. J. Wright. 2011. Hawthorne [J]. American Literary Scholarship (1): 31-43.
Singh, A. 2007. Margaret Drabble’s Novels: The Narrative Of Identity [M]. Delhi: Academic Excellence.
Spitzer, S. 1985. Fantasy and femaleness in Margaret Drabble’s The Millstone [A]. In E. C. Rose (ed.). Critical Essays on Margaret Drabble [C]. Boston: G. K. Hall. 87-105.
Whittier, G. 1980. Mistresses and Madonnas in the novels of Margaret Drabble [A]. In J. Todd (ed.). Gender and Literary Voice [C]. New York: Holmers & Meier. 197-213.
贝蒂·弗里丹.2007.第二阶段(小意译)[M].南京:江苏人民出版社.
伯特兰·罗素.2009.性爱与婚姻(文良文化译)[M].北京:中央编译出版社.
哈夫洛克·埃利斯.2004.性心理学(陈维政、王作虹、周邦宪、袁德成、龙葵译)[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社.
琳达·史密斯、威廉·瑞珀尔.2000.智慧之门:宗教与哲学的过去和现在(张念群译)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社.
刘林.2008.“海关”与《红字》的同构关系[J].外国文学研究(1):61-69.
刘巧.2012.含混——《磨砺》的解构主义解读[D].成都:四川外国语学院.
玛格丽特·德拉布尔.1997.磨砺——一个未婚母亲的自述(程遒欣、吕文镜译)[M].北京:中国文联出版公司.
毛凌莹.2011.《红字》中的镜子意象及其叙事意蕴[J].外国文学研究(3):81-88.
纳撒尼尔·霍桑.1996.红字(姚乃强译)[M].南京:译林出版社.
尼古拉·别尔嘉耶夫.1994.人的奴役与自由(徐黎明译)[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社.
彭石玉.2005.霍桑小说与《圣经》原型[J].外国文学(4):64-69.
王耀辉.2012.文学文本解读[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社.
威廉·詹姆士.2002.宗教经验之种种——人性之研究(唐钺译)[M].北京:商务印书馆.
杨跃华.2011.知识女性的愿景——玛格丽特·德拉布尔小说研究[M].成都:四川大学出版社.

[1]	LIU Hongwei. On the Unbalanced Family Ethic in Harold Pinter's The Homecoming [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 9-13.
[2]	CHEN Xi, ZHANG Yu. Clyde's Ethical Choice in An American Tragedy [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 14-18.
[3]	ZHENG Jie. Ethics and Evolution in Jack London's Boxing Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 19-24.
[4]	ZHANG Lianqiao. “Kill Child and Abuse Mother” with Ethical Taboos: On the Ethical Crisis in The American Dream [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 25-30.
[5]	BO Ling. Metamorphosis·Growing-up·Ethical Choice: An Ethical Reading of Andersen's Metamorphosis Fairy Tales [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(11): 31-36.
[6]	ZHANG Jianping. Polyphony, Empathy and Intertextuality in Dislocation: Caryl Phillips's Characteristics of Creation [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(10): 65-69.
[7]	TANG Ying. Multiple Ethical Reading of the Narrative in Money: A Suicide Note [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(10): 70-74.
[8]	LV Xiaofei. Jeanne Duval: The Reconstruction of Exotic Dancers' Subjectivity [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 63-68.
[9]	WU Jie. A Dialogue with Surrealism: Carter's Bristol Trilogy and the Collage Narrative Strategy [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(09): 69-73.
[10]	ZHANG Hu. Pamuk, the Soul of Turkey and Love Narrative [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(08): 59-63.
[11]	SHI Mi. Montgomery's Red-haired Anne and Its Influence on Canadian English Female Literature [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(08): 64-67.
[12]	WANG Yukuo. New Anthology, New Direction: An Interview with Professer Gene Jarrett [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(08): 71-73.
[13]	LIU Bin. “Native Son”: Victim of the Space Ideology [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 62-65.
[14]	SHI Min. Love or Hatred: Interpreting Love from the Perspective of Ethical Literary Criticism [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 66-70.
[15]	WANG Zuyou. Political Debate of a Black Writer: An Interview with Prof. Floyd W. Hayes [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 71-76.