Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01): 25-31.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.01.005
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Jing
Online:2015-01-28
Published:2020-07-25
CLC Number:
LI Jing. A Writer Reader Interaction Mechanism from SFL and CL Perspectives: Taking an American Stand-up Comedy Text as an Example[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 25-31.
| Ansarin, A. A. & H. T. Aliabdi. 2011. Reader engagement in English and Persian Applied Linguistics articles [J]. English Language Teaching 4(4): 154-64. Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces [M]. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar [A]. In A. Goldberg (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language [C]. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 113-30. Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks [J]. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-87. Fortanet, I. 2004. The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function [J]. English for Specific Purposes 23(1): 45-66. Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Edward Arnold. Hoey, M. 1983. On the Surface of Discourse [M]. London: George Allen and Unwin. Hoey, M. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis [M]. Oxford & New York: Routledge. Hyland, K. 2001. Bringing in the reader addressee features in academic articles [J]. Written Communication 18(4): 549-74. Hyland, K. 2002a. Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing [J]. Applied Linguistics 23(2): 215-39. Hyland, K. 2002b. What do they mean? Questions in academic writing [J]. TEXT 22(4): 529-58. Hyland, K. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing (13): 133-51. Hyland, K. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse [J]. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173-92. Hyland, K. 2006. Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices [J]. Linguistics and Education 16(4): 363-77. Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Myers, G. 1999. Interaction in writing: Principles and problems [A]. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.). Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices [C]. London and New York: Longman. 40-61. Swales, J. M., U. K. Ahmad & Y. Y. Chang. 1998. Consider this: The role of imperatives in scholarly writing [J]. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 97-121. Tapper, J. 1994. Directives used in college laboratory oral discourse [J]. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 209-22. Thompson, G. & P. Thetela. 1995. The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse [J]. TEXT 15: 103-27. Thompson, G. 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader [J]. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 58-78. Thompson, G. 2011. Interpersonal choices in the construction of the reader-in-the-text in UK newspaper editorials [DB/OL]. [2013-08-02]. http://corpuslg.org/gelc/inpla2011.php/2011/02/22/workshop-register-in-the-round-registerial-cartography. Thompson, G. 2012. Intersubjectivity in newspaper editorials: Construing the reader-in-the-text [J]. English Text Construction 5(1): 77-100. van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse [M]. London: Longman. Webber, P. 1994. The function of questions in different medical journal genres [J]. English for Specific Purposes 13(3): 257-68. Widdowson, H. G. 1984. Explorations in Applied Linguistics 2 [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 黄西.2010.黄西在2010全美电台电视记者协会年会晚宴上的演说全文[EB/OL].[2013-08-05].http://wenku.baidu.com/view/30989c0c76c66137ee06196b.html. 刘英.2004.《语篇的互动》述评[J].当代语言学6(2):180-84. 卢卫中、路云.2006.语篇衔接与连贯的认知机制[J].外语教学(1):13-18. 罗选民、黄勤.2006.互动:语篇的存在方式——评介Michael Hoey的《语篇互动》[J].外语教学26(5):90-93. 吕颖.2006.用“文本中的读者”概念提高写作能力[J].大学英语(学术版)(2):321-24. 苗兴伟、廖美珍.2007.隐喻的语篇功能研究[J].外语学刊(6):51-56. 唐青叶.2004.功能与认知研究的新发展[J].外国语(2):73-78. 王健坤、孙启耀.2008.概念整合理论对语篇连贯的解释力[J].外语学刊(1):104-107 汪少华、樊欣.2009.概念隐喻、概念整合与语篇连贯[J].外语教学与研究(4):24-29. 王文斌.2004.概念合成理论研究与应用的回顾与思考[J].外语研究(1):6-12. 王寅.2003.认知语言学与语篇分析——Langacker的语篇分析观[J].外语教学与研究(2):83-88. 王寅.2005.语篇连贯的认知世界分析方法——体验哲学和认知语言学对语篇连贯性的解释[J].外语学刊(4):16-23. 王寅.2006.认知语言学与语篇连贯研究——八论语言的体验性:语篇连贯的认知基础[J].外语研究(6):6-12. 王振华.2008.作为系统的语篇[J].外语学刊(3):50-56. 魏在江.2006.隐喻的语篇功能——兼论语篇分析与认知语言学的界面研究[J].外语教学(5):10-15. 魏在江.2007.概念转喻与语篇衔接——各派分歧,理论背景及实验支持[J].外国语(2):29-36. 张德禄.2001.论衔接[J].外国语(2):23-28. 张玮、张德禄.2008.隐喻性特征与语篇连贯研究[J].外语学刊(1):99-103. 赵秀凤、苏会艳.2010.多模态隐喻性语篇意义的认知构建——多模态转喻和隐喻互动下的整合[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)(4):18-24. 朱长河、朱永生. 2011.认知语篇学[J].外语学刊(2):35-39. |
| [1] | M. A. K. Halliday, HE Yuanxiu, YANG Bingjun. The Marxist Orientation of Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Special Interview with Professor Halliday [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 1-3. |
| [2] | ZHU Yongsheng. How Do We Know a Child Has Entered Adult Language Period? [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 4-7. |
| [3] | LI Hui, LI Quanhao, QIAO Quandi. Variation Study on Sellers’ Phatic Greetings in On-line Shopping Conversations [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 17-22. |
| [4] | MAO Junhan. The Pragmatic Analysis of Response Strategies in the Conflict Talk between Mother-in-law and Daughter-in-law [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 23-29. |
| [5] | JI Xiyuan. A Pragmatic Study of Mitigating Strategies for Interpersonal Conflicts in Unequal Power Relations [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(07): 30-34. |
| [6] | TIAN Huajing. Construing Identity through Attitudinal Analysis: A Case Study of One Report in The Sydney Morning Herald [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 5-11. |
| [7] | BAO Liuya. Power Relations of The Munich Pact from the Systemic Functional Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 12-16. |
| [8] | YU Meixin. Interpersonal Strategies Used in Defense Discourse in Chinese Criminal Trials: From the Systemic Functional Perspective [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(06): 17-22. |
| [9] | LI Xuejiao. A Contrastive Analysis of the Discrepant Phenomenon in JUDGEMENT and APPRECIATION [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 20-24. |
| [10] | DONG Baohua. Re-explaining Metafunctions of Formal Markers: A Case Study of the Cryptofunctions of Prop it [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 6-13. |
| [11] | ZHANG Xiangang. A Systemic Functional Semiotic Study of the Logogenesis of Journal Article Abstracts in Linguistics [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(01): 14-19. |
| [12] | WANG Tingjia, HUANG Guowen. On M. A. K. Halliday's Studies of the Cantonese Dialect [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 12-16. |
| [13] | SHANG Guowen. Grammar Grounded in Use: Usage-based Theory in Cognitive Linguistics [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(07): 17-21. |
| [14] | WANG Yin. On Qian Guanlian’s Academic Thread of Thought and Its Value [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(06): 14-19. |
| [15] | LIU Limin. “Dao” and “Logos”: Language Perspective of Cultural Differences between Chinese and Western Thoughts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014, 14(06): 59-69. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
