Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 35-40.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.05.007
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Jie
Published:2020-07-25
CLC Number:
WANG Jie. Assessment for Learning: Use of Formative Feedback in English Language Teaching and Learning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(5): 35-40.
| Angelo,T & P. Cross. 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Baron, R. A. 1988. Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 73(2): 199-207. Black, P. & D. William. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning [J]. Assessment in Education 5(1): 7-74. Boud, D., R. Cohen & J. Sampson. 1999. Peer learning and assessment [J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24(4): 413-26. Boud, D. 2000. Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning and assessment [J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24(4): 413-26. Brookhart, S. 2008. How to Give Effective Feedback to Your Students [M]. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Butler, D & P. Winne. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis [J]. Review of Educational Research 65(3): 245-81. Butler, R. 1986. Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 78(3): 210-16. Butler, R. 1987. Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 78(4): 210-16. Butler, R. 1988. Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and involvement [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58(1): 1-14. Cowan, J. 1999. Being an Innovative University Teacher [M]. Buckingham: Open University Press. Day, J. D. & L. A. Cordon. 1993. Static and dynamic measures of ability: An experimental comparison [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 85(1): 76-82. de Luque, M. F. & S. M. Sommer. 2000. The impact of culture on feed-back-seeking behavior: An integrated model and propositions [J]. Academy of Management Review 25(4): 829-49. Gibbs, G. 1999. Using assessment strategically to change the way students learning [A]. In S. Brown & A. Glasne (eds.). Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches [C]. Buckingham: Open University Press. 41-53. Gibbs, G & C. Simpson. 2004. Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning? [J]. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (1): 3-31. Goldstein, I. L., J.T. Emanuel & W.C. Howell. 1968. Effect of percentage and specificity of feedback on choice behavior in a probabilistic information-processing task [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 52(2): 163-68. Graesser, A. C., D. McNamara & K. VanLehn. 2005. Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through AutoTutor and iSTART [J]. Educational Psychologist 40(4): 225-34. Hamp-Lyons, L. 2009. Principles for large-scale classroom-based teacher assessment of English learners’ language: An initial framework from school-based assessment in Hong Kong [J]. TESOL Quarterly 43(3): 524-30. Hattie, J & H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback [J]. Review of Educational Research 77(1): 81-112. Hoska, D. M. 1993. Motivating learners through CBI feedback: Developing a positive learner perspective [A]. In V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (eds.). Interactive Instruction and Feedback [C]. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology. 105-32. Hounsell, D. & V. McCune. 2003. Students’ experiences of learning to present [A]. In C. Rust (ed.). Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice—Ten Years on [C]. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. 108-19. Ilgen, D. R., C. D. Fisher & M.S. Taylor. 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 64(4): 349-71. Irons, A. 2008. Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback [M]. London & New York: Routledge. Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Routledge. Lunsford, R. 1997. When less is more: principles for responding in the disciplines [J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 69: 91-104. McDonald, B & D. Boud. 2003. The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations [J]. Assessment in Education 10(2): 209-20. Mory, E. H. 2004. Feedback research review [A]. In D. Jonassen (ed.). Handbook of Research On Educational Communications and Technology [C]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 745-83. Narciss, S. & Huth, K. 2004. How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning [A]. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner & R. Brunken(eds.). Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning [C]. Munster: Waxmann. 181-95. Nicol, D. & D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice [J]. Studies in Higher Education 31(2): 199-218. Orsmond, P., S. Merry & K. Reiling. 2002. The use of formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27(4): 309-23. Page, E. B. 1958. Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology 49(4): 173-81. Shute, V. J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback [J]. Review of Educational Research 78(1): 153-89. Steadman, M. 1998. Using classroom assessment to change both learning and teaching [J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 75: 23-35. Stefani, L & D. Nicol. 1997. From teacher to facilitator of collaborative enquiry [A]. In S. Armstrong, G. Thompson & S. Brown (eds.). Facing up to Radical Changes in Universities and Colleges [C]. London: Kogan Page. 131-40 Stufflebeam, D. L. 1983. The CIPP model for program evaluation [A]. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven & D. L. Stufflebeam (eds.). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation [C]. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff. 117-41. Sweller, J., J. V. Merrienboer & F. Pass. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design [J]. Educational Psychology Review 10(3): 251-96. Taras, M. 2001. The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and tutors [J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26(6): 605-14. Taras, M. 2002. Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment [J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(6): 201-10. Taras, M. 2003. To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment [J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28(5): 549-65. 邓跃平、张薇.2009.任务型交互活动中的修正性反馈与目标语发展[J].外语教学(6):58-66. 教育部高等教育司.2007.大学英语课程教学要求[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社. 唐雄英、章少泉.2007.新型评价在大学英语教学中的实施和问题[J].外语与外语教学(1):14-19. 王学锋.2011.形成性评价反馈循环模式与英语写作教学[J].解放军外国语学院学报(1):52-55. 胥国红.2006.大学英语教师课堂反馈的功能研究[J].西安外国语学院学报(4):63-67. 中华人民共和国教育部.2012.义务教育英语课程标准(2011年版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社. |
| [1] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41. |
| [2] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81. |
| [3] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91. |
| [4] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96. |
| [5] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102. |
| [6] | XU Ying, BI Yu, ZHANG Yaqing. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108. |
| [7] | GUO Hongjie, ZHANG Daqiu, DING Dong. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44. |
| [8] | PAN Haiying, LIU Shuling. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52. |
| [9] | MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70. |
| [10] | TAO Jifen. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103. |
| [11] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110. |
| [12] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95. |
| [13] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105. |
| [14] | Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85. |
| [15] | Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
