Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2015, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (08): 11-17.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.08.003
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Wei
Online:2015-08-28
Published:2020-07-25
CLC Number:
ZHAO Wei. A Review of Compound Word Processing Research in China and Abroad[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015, 15(08): 11-17.
| Andrews, S. 1986. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (25): 726-40. Andrews, S., B. Miller & K. Rayner. 2004. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap [J]. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (16): 285-311. Baayen, R. H., T. Dijkstra & R. Schreuder. 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (37): 94-117. Butterworth, B. 1983. Lexical representation [A]. In B. Butterworth (ed.). Language Production (Vol. Ⅱ: Development, Writing, and Other Language Processes) [C]. London: Academic Press. 257-94. Caramazza, A., A. Laudanna & C. Romani. 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology [J]. Cognition (28): 297-332. Cheng, C., M. Wang & C. A. Perfetti. 2011. Acquisition of compound words in Chinese-English bilingual children: Decomposition and cross-language activation [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics (32): 583-600. Diependaele, K., J. A. Duñabeitia, J. Morris & E. Keuleers. 2011. Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 64: 344-58. Dressler, W. U. 2006. Compound types [A]. In G. Libben & G. Jarema (eds.). The Representation and Processing of Compound Words [C]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. 23-44. Duñabeitia, J., P. Manuel & C. Carreiras. 2007. The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (14): 1171-76. Fiorentino, R. & E. Fund-Reznicek. 2009. Masked morphological priming of compound constituents [J]. The Mental Lexicon (4): 159-93. Foroodi-Nejad, F. & J. Paradis. 2009. Crosslinguistic transfer in the acquisition of compound words in Persian-English bilinguals [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (12): 411-27. Frisson, S., R. Niswander-Klement & A. Pollatsek. 2008. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words [J]. British Journal of Psychology (99): 87-107. Jarema, G., C. Busson, R. Nikolova, K. Tsapkini & G. Libben. 1999. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study [J]. Brain and Language (68): 362-69. Jiang, N. & K. Forster. I. 2001. Cross-language priming asymmetries in lexical decision and episodic recognition [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (44): 32-51. Juhasz, B., M. Starr, A. W. Inhoff & L. Placke. 2003. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations [J]. British Journal of Psychology (94): 223-44. Ko, I., M. Wang & S. Kim. 2011. Bilingual reading of compound words [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (40): 49-73. Libben, G. 1998. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing and impairment [J]. Brian and Language (61): 30-44. Libben, G. 2014. The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective [J]. Cognitive Neuropsychology (31): 8-25. Libben, G., M. Gibson, Y. B. Yoon & D. Sandra. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness [J]. Brain and Language (84): 50-64. Libben, G. & G. Jarema. 2006. The representation and processing of compound words [C]. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Liu, Y. & D. Peng. 1997. Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course [A]. In H. Chen (ed.). Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages [C]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. 219-32. Longtin, C-M. & F. Meunier. 2005. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (53): 26-41. MacGregor, L. J. & Y. Shtyrov. 2013. Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG [J]. Brian & Language (126): 217-29. Marelli, M. & C. Luzzatti. 2012. Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (66): 644-64. Mayila, Y. 2010. English Compound Word Processing: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese-English Bilinguals [D]. Lawrence: University of Kansas. Nicoladis, E. 2002. What’s the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children’s crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns [J]. Journal of Child Language (29): 843-63. Plaut, D. C. & L. M. Gonnerman. 2000. Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (15): 445-85. Pollatsek, A., J. Hyönä & R. Bertram. 2000. The role of constituents in reading Finnish compound words [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (26): 820-33. Sandra, D. 1990. On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology (42): 529-67. Schreuder, R. & R. H. Baayen. 1995. Modeling morphological processing [A]. In L. B. Feldman (ed.). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing [C]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 131-56. Schreuder, R. & R. H. Baayen. 1997. How complex simplex words can be [J]. Journal of Memory and Language (37): 118-39. Seidenberg, M. S. & L. M. Gonnerman. 2000. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes [J]. Trends in cognitive Sciences (4): 353-61. Shoolman, N. & S. Andrews. 2003. Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification [A]. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Jupker (eds.). Masked Priming: The State of the Art (1st editon.) [C]. New York: Psychology Press. 241-78. Silva, R. & H. Clahsen. 2008. Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English [J]. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (11): 245-60. Taft, M. 1994. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (9): 271-94. Taft, M. & K. Forster. 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (14): 638-47. Taft, M. & K. Forster. 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (15): 607-20. Taft, M. & X. Zhu. 1995. The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study [A]. In L. Feldman (ed.). Morphological Aspects of Language Processing [C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 293-316. Zhang, B. & D. Peng. 1992. Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon [A]. In H. Chen & O. Zheng (eds.). Language Processing in Chinese [C]. Amsterdam: North-Holland . 131-49. Zwitserlood, P. 1994. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds [J]. Language and Cognitive Processes (9): 341-68. 陈士法.2009.英语复合词在英汉心理词典中存储单位的实验研究[J].外语教学与研究(3):211-16. 陈士法、苗兴伟、方洁.2007.英汉双语心理词典中英语单词的存储单位——一项实验研究[J].外语教学与研究(1):51-55.甘彩虹、张金桥.2012.重复启动条件下汉英双语者英语复合词的词汇通达机制[J].心理与行为研究(5):595-600. 王春茂、彭聃龄.1999.合成词加工中的词频、词素频率及语义透明度[J].心理学报(3):266-73. 药盼盼、李妮、陈宝国.2012.词根频率对汉语母语者英语屈折 词和派生词表征方式的影响[J].外语教学与研究(5):694-705. 张北镇.2014.中国英语学习者派生词加工研究[J].现代外语(2):221-30. |
| [1] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41. |
| [2] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81. |
| [3] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91. |
| [4] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96. |
| [5] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102. |
| [6] | XU Ying, BI Yu, ZHANG Yaqing. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108. |
| [7] | GUO Hongjie, ZHANG Daqiu, DING Dong. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44. |
| [8] | PAN Haiying, LIU Shuling. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52. |
| [9] | MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70. |
| [10] | TAO Jifen. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103. |
| [11] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110. |
| [12] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95. |
| [13] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105. |
| [14] | Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85. |
| [15] | Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
