Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2018, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01): 5-12.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2018.01.001
Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Yi, CHEN Ye
Published:2020-07-25
CLC Number:
SUN Yi, CHEN Ye. A New Insight into Chinese-English Number Metaphors[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2018, 18(01): 5-12.
| Aristotle. 1954. Rhetoric and Poetics [M]. New York: The Modern Library. Bassok, K. 1976. “Wise words” of the western apache: Metaphor and semantic theory [A]. In Basso, K.＆ H. Selly (eds.). Meaning in Anthropology [C]. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. 93-121. Chiu, M. M. (2001). Using metaphors to understand and solve arithmetic problems: Novices and experts working with negative numbers [J]. Mathematical Thinking and Learning3(2/3): 93-124. Emanatian, M. 1995. Metaphor and the expression of emotion: The value of cross-cultural perspectives [J]. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity (3):163-182. Falck, M. & R. Gibbs Jr. 2012. Embodied motivations for metaphorical meanings [J]. Cognitive Linguistics (2):251-272. Gibbs, R. Jr. 1999. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world [A]. In Gibbs, R. Jr. ＆ G. Steen (eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 145-166. Herbst, P. 1997. The number-line metaphor in the discourse of a textbook series [J]. For the Learning of Mathematics (3):36-45. Kövecses, Z. 2003. Language, figurative thought, and cross-cultural comparison [J]. Metaphor and Symbol (4):311-320. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Lakoff. G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Siu, P. 1986. Understanding Chinese prose: Effects of number of ideas, metaphor, and advance organizer on comprehension [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology (6):417-423. Shore, B. 1996. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 陈勇. 2005. 浅论隐喻的文化认知价值[J].中国俄语教学(2):2-4. 陈望道. 1979. 修辞学发凡[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社. 侯外庐. 1957. 中国思想通史(二卷)[M]. 北京:人民出版社. 李福印. 2005. 概念隐喻理论和存在的问题[J]. 中国外语(4):21-28. 李福印、秦进平. 2007. 隐喻与认知研究25年(1980-2004): 成绩、问题与展望[J]. 中国外语(4):17-22. 刘明阁. 2007. 英汉语言中数字文化含义差异分析[J]. 南阳师范学院学报(社会科学版)(2):88-89. 刘艳晖. 2009. 英汉数字中吉凶数字的隐喻意义研究[J]. 牡丹江教育学报(4):38-39. 撒忠清、冯敬玉. 2012. 英、汉思维与表征形态差异——析英、汉语言静动表征态势的哲学视角[J]. 外语学刊(4):77-80. 苏立昌. 2009. 英汉概念隐喻用法比较词典[M]. 天津:南开大学出版社. 谭业升、陈敏. 2010. 汉语经济隐喻的一项历时研究[J]. 语言教学与研究(5):84-90. 王德春、陈晨. 2001. 现代修辞学[M]. 上海外语教育出版社. 王寅、王天翼. 2009. “AS认知方式”:隐喻等机制的统一解释——十五论语言的体验性[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报(4):1-6. 王寅. 2005. 再论语言的体验性——认知语言学的语言体验观[J]. 山东外语教学(2):3-8. 王寅. 2008. 认知语言学的“体验性概念化”对翻译主客观性的解释力——一项基于古诗《枫桥夜泊》40篇英语译文的研究[J]. 外语教学与研究(3):211-213. 王晶芝、杨忠. 2012. 隐喻在政治新闻语篇中运用的可行性探讨[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)(3):111-113. 王秉钦. 1998. 语言与翻译新论[M]. 天津:南开大学出版社. 朱天顺. 1982. 中国宗教初探[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社. 郑震. 2003. 论身体[J]. 社会学研究(1):52-59. 张少云. 2003. 认知语言学的隐喻研究[J]. 修辞学习(2):20-21. |
| [1] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41. |
| [2] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81. |
| [3] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91. |
| [4] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96. |
| [5] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102. |
| [6] | Ying XU, Yu BI, Yaqing ZHANG. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108. |
| [7] | Hongjie GUO, Daqiu ZHANG, Dong DING. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44. |
| [8] | Haiying PAN, Shuling LIU. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52. |
| [9] | Bingjun MA, Hui CHANG. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70. |
| [10] | Jifen TAO. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103. |
| [11] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110. |
| [12] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95. |
| [13] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105. |
| [14] | Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85. |
| [15] | Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
