Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies ›› 2013, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (07): 25-29.
Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Lihong
Online:
2013-07-15
Published:
2020-07-25
CLC Number:
LU Lihong. A Study of the Construction and the Application of “6+2” Foreign Language earning Systems[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(07): 25-29.
Barbara, Ischinger. 2009. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS [EB/OL]. [2013-06-07]. http:∥www.oecd.org/publishing. Brown, J. S., A. Collins & P. Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning [J]. Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32-42. Brush, T. & J. Saye. 2000. Implememtation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study [J]. ETR & D 48(3): 79. Gass, S. M. 2003. Input and interaction [A]. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long(eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. London:Blackwell. 224-25. Hannafin, M. J & S. Land. 1997. The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced, student-centered learning environments [J]. Instructional Science 25(3): 167-202. Jonassen, D. H. & L. Roheer-Murphy. 1999. Activity theory as a framework for designing framework for constructivist learning environment [J]. ETR & D 47(1): 61-79. Jonassen, D. H., K. Peck & B. Wilson. 1999. Learning With Technology: A Constructivist Perspective [M]. New York: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Larsen-Freeman, D. & L. Cameron. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lave, J. & E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press. Oliver, K. 2001. Developing and refining mental models in open-ended learning environments: A case study [J]. ETR & D 49(4): 5-32. Perkins, D. N. 1992. Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? [A]. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Onassen (eds.). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation [C]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 45-55. Pica, T. 1994. Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? [J] Language Learning 44(3): 493-527. Richardson, A. 2002. An ecology of learning and the role of e-learning in the learning environment [EB/OL]. [2013-06-07]. http:∥unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan007791.pdf. Wilson, B. G. 1995. Metaphors for Instructions: Why we talk about learning environments [J]. Educational Technology 35(9-10): 25-30. 陈琦、张建伟.2003.信息时代的整合性学习模型——信息技术整合于教学的生态观诠释[J].北京大学教育评论1(3):90-96. 戴维·H·乔纳森.2002.学习环境的理论基础(郑太年等译)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社. 高文.2003.面向新千年的学习理论创新[J].全球教育展望(4):26-31 高文、徐斌艳、吴刚.2008.建构主义教育研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社. 何克抗、李文光.2002.教育技术学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社. 黄远振、陈维振.2007.内容与形式:从对立走向统一——英语课堂生态观[J].中小学英语教学与研究(12):25-28. 胡继岳、章国英、沈兰萍.2003英语网络课程发展的教学模式研究[J].外语电化教学(1):12-15. 李翠白.2006.西方情境学习理论的发展与应用反思[J].电化教育研究(9):20-24. 李新民.2006.构建大学英语多媒体网络教学模式的探索[J].外语电化教学(2):13-17. 李宇明.1994.语言学习理论[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社. 卢丽虹.2012.学习共同体理论及外语教学的新视角——以国家精品课程“企业文秘英语”为例[J].开放教育研究18(4):26-29. 孙红.2004.构建学习者自主的语言学习环境[J].外语电化教学(5):64-67. 王振芳.2003.网络特征与英语学习环境创设[J].外语电化教学(5):10-13. 徐陶、彭文波.2002.课堂生态观[J].教育理论与实践22(10):37-40 杨开城.2000.建构主义学习环境的设计原则[J].中国电化教育(4):14-18. 曾葡初.2005.英语教学环境[M].北京:人民教育出版社. 张华.2003.多媒体和网络环境下大学英语教学模式探索[J].外语电化教学(2):37-40. 郑葳、王大为.2006.生态学习观及其教育实践启示[J].教育研究与实验(1):53-57. 钟志贤.2005.论学习环境设计[J].电化教育研究(7):35-41. 钟志贤、刘春燕.2006.论学习环境设计中的任务、情境与问题概念[J].电化教育研究(3):16-21. 钟志贤、张琦.2005.论学习环境中资源、工具与评价的设计[J].开放教育研究11(3):62-67 朱晓鸽.1996.论学习环境设计[J].中国电化教育(7):16-18. 朱晔.2005.英语网络学习策略缺失问题及其对策[J].外语电化教学(1):23-26. |
[1] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41. |
[2] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81. |
[3] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91. |
[4] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96. |
[5] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102. |
[6] | XU Ying, BI Yu, ZHANG Yaqing. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108. |
[7] | GUO Hongjie, ZHANG Daqiu, DING Dong. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44. |
[8] | PAN Haiying, LIU Shuling. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52. |
[9] | MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70. |
[10] | TAO Jifen. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103. |
[11] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110. |
[12] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95. |
[13] | . [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105. |
[14] | Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85. |
[15] | Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||