A Study of Chinese EFL Learners' Oral Chunk-output on the Basis of Dual Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning

Abstract

Abstract: External supervisor system is a crucial part of MTI quality control. Based on the practical experience of MTI program management at a university in Shanghai, this paper discusses some problems in the current management system, including the qualification of prospective applicants, their academic ranks and titles, performance assessment and coordination between internal and external supervisors, and attempts to propose strategies and suggestions for comprehensive management mechanism. It is proposed that each training program set up a corresponding management model covering the selection of qualified candidates, training plans, regular meetings, and performance assessment in accordance with its own situations and the guidelines of National Supervisory Committee for MTI Education.

CLC Number:

H319

FENG Junchao. A Study of Chinese EFL Learners' Oral Chunk-output on the Basis of Dual Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2013, 13(10): 38-42.

References

Conklin, K. & N. Schmitt. 2008. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than non-formulaic language by native and non-native speakers [J]. Applied Linguistics 29(1): 72-89.
Ellis, N. 2003. Construction, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure [A]. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C]. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Goodman, K. S. 1986. What's Whole about Whole Language? A Parent/ Teacher Guide to Children's Learning [M]. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Jiang, N. & T.M. Nekrasova. 2007. The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers [J]. Modern Language Journal 91(3): 433-45.
Kormos, J. 2006. Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition [M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. 1997. The Comprehensible Hypothesis: Recent evidence [J]. English Teachers' Journal 51(12): 17-29.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. From Intention to Articulation [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levis, J. M. 2006. Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language [A]. In R. Hughes (ed.). Spoken English, TESOL and Applied Linguistics: Challenges for Theory and Practice [C]. Basingstok: Palgrave Macmil.
Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. 2002. Animation as an aid to multimedia learning [J]. Education Psychology Review 14(1): 87-99.
Met, M. 1991. Learning language through content [J]. Foreign Language Annals 24(4): 281-95.
Myles, F. R. Mitchell & J. Hooper. 1999. Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(5): 44-52.
Nittingger, J. R. &J. DeCarrico. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pawley, A & F. H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency [A]. In J. C. Richards &R. W. Schmidt (eds.). Language and Communication [C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 317-31.
Raupach, M. 1984. Formulaic in second language speech production [A]. In H. W. Dechert, D. Mohle & M. Raupach (eds.). Second Language Production [C]. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 114-37.
Schmitt, N. & R. Carter. 2004. Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction [A]. In N. Schmitt (ed.). Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1-22.
Segalowitz, N. 2000. Automaticity and attention skill in fluent performance [A]. In H. Riggenbach (ed.). Perspectives on Fluency [C]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Skehan, P. 1989. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
Skehan, P.1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spottl, C. & M. Mccarthy. 2004. Comparing the knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3 and L4 [A]. In N. Schmitt (ed.). Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 191-225
Wood, D. 2006. Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 13-33.
Wood, D. 2007. Mastering the English formulaic: Fluency development of Japanese learners in a study abroad context [J]. JALT Journal 29(2): 87-101.
Wray, A. & M. R. Perkins. 2000. The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model [J]. Language & Communication 20(2): 176-94.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
丁言仁、戚焱.2005.词块运用与英语口语和写作水平的相关研究[J].解放军外国语学院学报(3):49-53.
樊建华、金志成.2006.认知负荷理论与多媒体学习软件[J].中国电化教育(8):86-88.
刘儒德、赵妍.2007.多媒体学习的影响因素[J].中国电化教育(10):1-5.
王小明.2008.多媒体学习与多媒体设计:认知观点[J].全球教育展望(2):42-46.
卫乃兴.2007.中国学生英语口语的短语学特征研究[J].现代外语(3):280-91.

[1]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 35-41.
[2]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 72-81.
[3]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 82-91.
[4]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 92-96.
[5]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 454(4): 97-102.
[6]	XU Ying, BI Yu, ZHANG Yaqing. A Review of Vocabulary and English for Specific Purposes Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 104-108.
[7]	GUO Hongjie, ZHANG Daqiu, DING Dong. An Integrated and Innovative Talents-fostering Model with Practices for FLL Discipline at Chinese Financial Universities in the New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 35-44.
[8]	PAN Haiying, LIU Shuling. Innovation and Development of College Foreign Languages Teaching in the Construction of New Liberal Arts [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 45-52.
[9]	MA Bingjun, CHANG Hui. Research on L2 Chinese Syntactic Processing: Theories and Empirical Studies [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 61-70.
[10]	TAO Jifen. POA-based Reading and Speaking Approach to Oral English Teaching [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 453(3): 96-103.
[11]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 106-110.
[12]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 84-95.
[13]	. [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 452(2): 96-105.
[14]	Lihe HUANG. Foreign Language Teaching and Research in the Post- pandemic Era: A Multimodal Paradigm [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 75-85.
[15]	Yongyan ZHENG. Multilingual Research in a Post-COVID Era: Reflection and Prospection [J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2021, 451(1): 64-74.