On the ground of the theories of Second Language Acquisition and ESP, especially the theories by Chomsky, Krashen, and Mohan, this article puts forth an innovative teaching method: Content-based English Instruction for Specific Business Purposes, intending to shed some lights on the practices of reforming the current English education in the universities of Economics and Finance. A comprehensive explanation, in this paper, is given to the ESBP and its Theoretical Concept, Teaching Objects, Curriculum, Teaching Approaches, Quality Administration, and Determinants. Besides, some suggestive remarks are presented. The paper makes some explorative studies on the solutions to the problems existing in the English instruction by the Mainland higher education.
ZHAN Jun
. Reforming English Education in the Mainland Universities of Economics and Finance to Meet the Demands of the 21st Century: Research on the Teaching Method of Content-based English Instruction for Specific Business Purposes[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014
, 14(03)
: 20
-32
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.03.005
Bodie, Z. & Merton, R. C. 1998. Finance [M]. New York & London: Prentice Hall.
Brinton, D., M. Snow & M. Wesche.2003. Content-based Second Language Instruction (Michigan Classics Edtion) [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carver, D.1983. Some propositions about ESP [J]. The ESP Journal (2): 131-37.
Dudley-Evans, T. & St. John, M. 1998. Developments in ESP: A Multi-disciplinary Approach [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gatehouse, K. 2001. Key issues in English for specific purposes (ESP) curriculum development [J/OL]. [2014-03-12]. http:∥iteslj.org/Articles/Gatehouse-ESP.html.Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. 1987. English for Specific Purposes: a Learning Centered Approach [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
John, F .& P. Matthew. 2001. Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johns, A. M. & Dudley-Evens, T. 1991. English for specific purposes: International in scope, specific in purpose [J]. TESOL Quarterly 25: 297-314.
Krashen, S. D. 1985. Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. New York: Longman.
Krashen, S. D. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis [J]. Modern Language Journal 73: 440-64.
Krashen, S. D. 2005. The acquisition of English by children in two-way programs: What does the research say? [A]. In V. Gonzales & J. Tinajero (eds.). Review of Research and Practice, National Association for Bilingual Education (3): 1-19.
Krashen, S. D. 2012. Developing academic language: Some hypotheses [J]. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 7(2): 8-15.
Mohan, B. A. 1986. Language and Content [M]. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Richards, J. C. & Rogers, T. S. 2008. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching [M].Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 204-09.
Stevens, P. 1988. ESP after Twenty Years: A Re-appraisal [M]. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Centre.
蔡基刚.2012.中国大学英语教学路在何方[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社.
束定芳.2004.外语教学改革:问题与对策[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
夏纪梅.2003.现代外语课程设计理论与实践[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社.
张为民、张文霞、刘梅华.2011.通用英语教学转向学术英语教学的探索——清华大学公外本科生英语教学改革设想[J].外语研究(5):11-16.
赵庆红、雷蕾、张梅.学生英语学习需求视角下的大学英语教学[J].外语界(4):14-18.
周燕.2005.高校英语教师发展需求调查与研究[J].外语教学与研究(3):206-10.
兹维·博迪.2010.金融学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.
