Articles

Corrective Feedback Type, Error Type, and Immediate Effects of Feedback

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

Corrective written feedback has been an extensively researched topic in second language writing, but there have not been many studies on EFL learners. The present study is reflective in nature, examining the teacher- researcher's error correction practice and such activity's immediate effects. Results show that direct feedback has the best immediate effects, and the two indirect corrections also have good effects. Error type is found to affect students' revision. The frequency of error types is negatively correlated with students' correction results. Whatever error type is involved, there is a high rate of successful correction if students notice and try to correct the errors. On the other hand, there are also marked errors ignored by students, and even more so if the errors are unmarked, which suggests that Chinese EFL learners rely heavily on instructors' error correction and are weak in the ability to find and correct errors on their own.

Cite this article

JI Xiaoling, LU Xiao . Corrective Feedback Type, Error Type, and Immediate Effects of Feedback[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014 , 14(08) : 36 -40 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.08.006

References

Ashwell, T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multi-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(3): 227-57.
Bitchener, J. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 17: 102-18.
Bitchener, J. & U. Knoch. 2010. Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 19(2): 207-17.
Bitchener, J., S. Young & D. Cameron. 2005. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 14: 191-205.
Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 267-96.
Evans, N. W., K. J. Hartshorn & E. A. Tuioti. 2010. Written corrective feedback: Practitioners' perspectives [J]. International Journal of English Studies 10(2): 47-77.
Ferris, D. R. 2002. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing [M]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. & B. Roberts. 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? [J] Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 161-84.
Hong, Y. 2004. The Effect of Teachers' Error Feedback on International Students' Self-correction Ability [D]. Provo: Brigham Young University.
Lalande, J. F. 1992. Reducing composition errors: An experiment [J]. The Modern Language Journal 66(2): 140-49.
Liu, Y. -L. 2008. The effects of error feedback in second language writing [J]. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching 15: 65-79.
Robb, T., S. Ross & I. Shortreed.1986. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality [J]. TESOL Quarterly 20(1): 83-95.
Schmidt, R. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning [J]. Applied Linguistics 11: 129-58.
Truscott, J. 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes [J]. Language Learning 46: 327-69.
Truscott, J. & A. Y. -P. Hsu. 2008. Error correction, revision and learning [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing 17: 293-305.
陈晓湘、李会娜.2009.教师书面修正性反馈对学生英语写作的影响[J].外语教学与研究(5):351-58.
纪小凌.2012.大学英语写作教学纠错研究:学生期望及纠错效果[R].武汉:第五届中国第二语言习得研究国际学术研讨会.
李勇、邓红霞.2012.教师书面修正性反馈对英语写作复杂度的影响[J].外语研究(2):55-62.
汪卫红、胡冬梅.2010.非英语专业大学生英语作文教师反馈效度研究[J].中国外语教育(3):41-51.
Outlines

/