Harold Pinter's The Homecoming (1965) dramatizes the broken family structure and the discord with each other while presenting the failed appeals of Ruth's identity. The process of Ruth's quest for the identity and love constitutes the main ethical line of the drama. Initially, Ruth is eager to be accepted by her husband Teddy's family; later, however, prevented by Lenny's deliberate distortions, Max's vicious misinterpretations and Teddy's betrayal, she eventually abandons the endeavors. From the perspective of Ethical Literary Criticism, Ruth's choices demonstrate that she has decided to terminate any familial relationship with the family, particularly, when she is proposed and devalued into a prostitute who has to earn her keep, which causes the imbalance of the ethical family structure. Since the essence of “home” has been changed, this “home” becomes meaningless to Ruth and actually for her there is no “home” to go. In The Homecoming, Pinter tries to illustrate his idea about the family value: the family is only an “empty shell” without the family warmth. Moreover, Ruth's failure also reflects that the materialized social value pervade and smash the traditional family ethic and kinship.
LIU Hongwei
. On the Unbalanced Family Ethic in Harold Pinter's The Homecoming[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014
, 14(11)
: 9
-13
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.11.002
Bilington, M. 2007. Harold Pinter [M]. London: Faber & Faber.
Halton, K. 1967. Pinter [J]. Vogue (1): 246.
Innes, C. 2002. Modern British Drama: Twentieth Century [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lahr, J. (ed.). 1971. A Casebook on Harold Pinter's The Homecoming [C]. New York: Grove Press.
Merritt, S. H. 1990. Pinter in Play: Critical Strategies and the Plays of Harold Pinter[ M]. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Page, M. 1993. File on Pinter [M]. London: Methuen Drama.
Prentice, P. 2000. The Pinter Ethic: The Erotic Aesthetic [M]. New York: Garland.
哈罗德·品特.2010.送菜升降机(华明译)[M].南京:译林出版社.
罗国杰.2007.伦理学[M].北京:人民出版社.
聂珍钊.2010.文学伦理学批评:基本理论与术语[J].外国文学研究(1):12-22.
聂珍钊.2014.文学伦理学批评导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.