An American Tragedy is a representative work of Theodore Dreiser, an American novelist of realism. This novel, with a vivid description of the protagonist Clyde's brief life, reveals the corruption and destruction of the young generation exerted by the social trends, life style and morality during the transitional period of society. This paper deems that the external cause of Clyde's tragedy is the ethical environment, including the prevailing materialism, money worship the increasing gap between the rich and the poor and the misinterpretation of the “American Dream”, all of which lead to the distortion of Clyde's personal values. Furthermore, the internal cause of his tragedy lies in his lack of ethical awareness and his tendency of being controlled by personal desires. Immersed in pursuit of material comforts and personal pleasures, Clyde violates the traditional ethical norms and challenges the ethical taboos, which leads to his loss of self and hence his tragedy. Therefore, An American Tragedy is not only a tragedy about family, love, law, politics, and religion, but in essence an ethical tragedy. Due to the novel's rich ethical connotation, this paper, from the perspective of ethical literary criticism, explores how the ethical environment affects Clyde's ethical selections by deconstructing the three phases corresponding to the three parts of the novel: Clyde's restless animal factor, his incontrollable free will and the return of his rational will. This paper focuses on how the different combinations and variations of the Sphinx Factor in the process of Clyde's ethical selection cause the ethical conflicts between his free will and rational will, aiming to explain the ethical essence of Clyde's tragedy as well as embody the significance of traditional moral norms in the course of ethical selections.
Farrell, J. T. 1946. Theodore Dreiser [J]. Chicago Review (3): 127-44.
Gerber P. 1991. “A Beautiful Legal Problem”: Albert Levitt on An American Tragedy [J]. Language & Literature 27(2): 214-42.
Lord, D. 1941. Dreiser today [J]. Prairie Schooner (15): 230-39.
McAleer, J. J. 1968.Theodore Dreiser: An Introduction and Interpretation [M]. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Rhodes, C. 1996. Twenties fiction, mass culture, and the modern subject [J]. American Literature (68): 399.
Sally, T. 1990. Criminal justice system in An American Tragedy [J]. Studies in the Novel (4): 429-40.
A. H.马斯洛.1987.动机与人格(许金声、程朝翔译)[M].北京:华夏出版社.
埃·弗洛姆.1988.为自己的人(孙依依译)[M].北京:三联书店.
侯建新.1993.西方两性关系史评述[J].天津师大学报(4):53-72.
蒋道超.2007.从小说创作看美国性伦理与政治意识间互动的演变[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)(1):14-22.
刘红卫.2013.自由意志,理性意志与“激情之爱”——《背叛》中“婚外情”的伦理解读[J].外国文学研究(6):26-33.
毛凌滢.2008.消费伦理与欲望叙事:德莱赛《美国悲剧》的当代启示[J].外国文学研究(3):56-63.
聂珍钊.2011.文学伦理学批评:伦理选择与斯芬克斯因子[J].外国文学研究(6):1-13.
聂珍钊.2014.文学论理学批评导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
西奥多·德莱赛.2001.美国悲剧(赵小兰、王成云译)[M].延吉:延边人民出版社.
赵梅.1997.“选择权”与“生命权”——美国有关堕胎问题的论争[J].美国研究(4):55-87.
张玉龙、陈晓阳.2012.恐惧的伦理价值及其意义[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)(1):60-64.