Metamorphosis is a motif often used in literary works. In his fairy tales, Andersen creatively connects the motif of metamorphosis with maturation. He presents the ethical dimension of humanity through metamorphosis and explores the meaning of growing up. Andersen creatively imbeds initiation ritual in transformation from animal-human hybrid to human being, connects human-to-animal transformation with the drive of socialization, and presents petrifaction as a metaphor of the termination of growing-up. By connecting metamorphosis with maturation, Andersen brings a new ethical dimension to this traditional motif, presenting growing-up as an ethical rebirth. From the perspective of ethical literary criticism, metamorphosis results from the change of Sphinx Factor, which is constituted by human factor and animal factor. Human factor, as a result of ethical choice, comes into being during the process of civilization, with moral consciousness as its core, while animal factor, the irrational one, is the legacy of human beings' animal ancestors, with desire at its central place. In fairy tales with metamorphosis motif, the protagonist can successfully transform to human being and, at the same time, grow up, when he or she becomes morally conscious and can restrain their irrational desire; if the protagonist surrenders to his or her desire, he or she will be changed into animal or inanimate being, with their maturation and socialization process terminated. With its ethical implication, in Andersen's metamorphosis fairy tales, maturation means to form an ethical identity, becoming morally conscious and capable of making ethical choice. Imbedding the ethical implication in metamorphosis, Andersen aims to set up model figures to help children understand the difference between man and animal, and thus guide their ethical choices.
BO Ling
. Metamorphosis·Growing-up·Ethical Choice: An Ethical Reading of Andersen's Metamorphosis Fairy Tales[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2014
, 14(11)
: 31
-36
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2014.11.006
Altmann, A. E. & Gail de Vos. 2001. Tales Then and Now: More Folktales as Literary Fictions for Young Adults [M]. Colorado: Greenwood.
Easterlin, N. 2001. Hans Christian Andersen's fish out of water [J]. Philosophy and Literature (25): 251-77.
Jean-Charles, S. 1998. Dictionary of Literary Theme and Motif A-J [M]. Westport: Greenwood.
Johansen, J. D. 1996. The merciless tragedy of desire: An interpretation of H. C. Andersen's “Den lille Havfrue” [J]. Scandinavian Studies 68(2): 203-41.
Lassén-Seger, M. 2006. Adventure into the Otherness: Metamorphosis and Children's Literature [M]. Abo: Abo Akademi University Press.
Thomsen, U. 1988. Splash! Six views of Little Mermaid [J]. Scandinavian Studies (63): 141-63.
Zipes, J. 2005. Hans Christian Andersen: The Misunderstood Storyteller [M]. New York: Routledge.
Wullschlager, J. 2000. Hans Christian Andersen: The Life of a Storyteller [M]. London: Penguin Books.
安徒生.2009.安徒生童话全集(叶君健译)[M].北京:中国城市出版社.
富凯.2012.水妖[A].德国浪漫派文学丛书(袁志英等译)[M].上海:上海译文出版社.
赫胥黎.1971.进化论与伦理学(进化论与伦理学翻译组译)[M].北京:科学出版社.
杰克·齐普斯.2008.作为神话的童话/作为童话的神话(赵霞译)[M].上海:少年儿童出版社.
聂珍钊.2014.文学伦理学批评导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
乔治·布兰兑斯.1999.童话诗人安徒生(严绍端、欧阳俊岭译)[A].约翰·迪米留斯.丹麦安徒生研究论文选[C].合肥:安徽少年儿童出版社.
詹斯·安徒生.2005.安徒生传(陈雪松、刘寅龙译)[M].北京:九州出版社.