Articles

A Pragma-Cognitive Approach to Similitudo Utterances

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

This article, based on data collected as of marriage/family topics, approaches Similitudo utterances from a pragma-cognitive perspective. On the one hand, it takes Similitudo as pragmatic resources and provides a description of its pragmatic features, including its pragmatic construct, functions, effects and modes of realizations; on the other hand, it takes Similitudo as argumentative strategies and interprets its cognitive mechanism.

Cite this article

YU Shenming . A Pragma-Cognitive Approach to Similitudo Utterances[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015 , 15(05) : 11 -16 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.05.003

References

Aristotle. 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (2nd ed. Trans. by G. Kennedy) [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching [M]. London: Longman.
Brummett, B. 2000. Reading Rhetorical Theory [M]. Orlando: Harcourt College.
Conley, T. 1983. Aristotle, Rhetoric Ⅰ [J]. Ancient Philosophy 3(1): 102-7.
Corbett, E. P. J. & R. J. Connors. 1999. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student [M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cottrell, S. 2005. Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Evans, V. & M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar [A]. In A. Goldberg (ed.). Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language [C]. Stanford: CSLI.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks [J]. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-87.
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
Fleming, D. 2003. Becoming thetorical [A]. In J. Petraglia & D. Bahri (eds.). The Realms of Rhetoric [C]. New York: State University of New York Press. 93-116.
Gilbert, A. 2004. Learn How to Be an Upright Person [M]. Beijing: Earthquake Press.
Goodnight, G. T. 1999. The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument [A]. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit & S. Caudill (eds.). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader [C]. New York: Guilford Press. 251-64.
Grimaldi, W. M. A. 1978. Rhetoric and truth: A note on Aristotle [J]. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11(3): 173-77.
Huseman, R. C. 1994. Aristotle’s system of topics [A]. In E. Schiappa (ed.). Landmark Essays on Classical Greek Rhetoric [C]. Davis: Hermagoras Press. 191-99.
Johnson, S. 2002. One Minute Sales Person [M]. Haikou: Nanhai.
Petraglia, J. & D. Bahri. 2003. The Realms of Rhetoric [M]. New York: State University of New York Press.
Richland, L. E., T.-K. Chan, R. G. Morrison & T. K.-F. Au. 2010. Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences [J]. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 105: 146-53.
Sproule, J. M. 1980. Argument: Language and Its Influence [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
梁洁.2005.论临床护理中的换位思考[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报26(3):25-7.
秦明星.2010.类推:外语学习中使用的一种认知策略探析[J].鸡西大学学报10(3):108-9.
孙鹏勇.2006.浅议学生管理中的换位思考[J].陕西教育理论71:20-22.
孙振奎.2008.试论换位思考在构建和谐社会中的作用[J].廊坊师范学院学报24:75-6.
王中祥.2010.类比词语义认知的概念合成视角[J].浙江万里学院学报23:48-52.
赵宏宇.2002.试论英语类比构词[J].辽宁师范大学学报25(4):78-81.
周东海、邱小群.2005.换位思考:一个成功的伟大细节[M].北京:中华工商联合出版社.
Outlines

/