Articles

How Do We Know a Child Has Entered Adult Language Period?

Expand

Online published: 2020-07-25

Abstract

Halliday (1975, 2007) divided child language development into three phases: protolanguage, transition and adult language and analyzed the criteria of entry into Phase I and Phase Ⅱ and the functions performed and meanings realized by conducting a case study. Talking about when a child can be said to have entered Phase Ⅲ, Halliday (1975) held: “By the end of Phase Ⅱ, the child has entered the adult language. He has built up a system that is multi-stratal (content, form and expression) and multifunctional (ideational, interpersonal and textual). From this point on, he is adding to what he already has. He has learned how to mean; his language development now consists in extending his range of meaning potential to broader cultural horizons.” Halliday (2007) took dialogue as another important criterion. In order to get a better understanding of the law of child language development, this paper attempts to prove through a case study that interpersonal metaphor, structural completeness and texture should be regarded as the criteria together with multistratification, multifunctionality and dialogicity to judge whether the child has entered Phase Ⅲ.

Cite this article

ZHU Yongsheng . How Do We Know a Child Has Entered Adult Language Period?[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015 , 15(07) : 4 -7 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.07.002

References

Bakhtin, M. 1984. Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel: Notes toward a Historical Poetics (Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist trans.) [M]. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language [A]. In E. Lenneberg & E. Lenneberg (eds.). Foundations of Language Development: A Multidisciplinary Perspective [C]. London: Academic Press. 239-65.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1979. Three aspects of children’s language development: Learning language, learning through language, learning about language [A]. In Y. Goodman, M. Hausser & D. Strickland (eds.). Oral and Written Language Development: Impact on Schools. Proceedings from the 1979 and 1980 IMPACT Conferences [C]. Urbana: International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. 2007. Early language learning: A sociolinguistic approach [A]. In J. Webster (ed.). The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press. 60-89.
Halliday, M.A.K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning [M]. London & New York: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2013. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.) [M]. London & New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English [M]. London: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1985. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective [M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure [M]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Painter, C. 2004. The “Interpersonal first” principle in child language development [A]. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (eds.). Language Development: Functional Perspectives on Species and Individuals [C]. London: Continuum. 133-53.
朱永生.1997.韩礼德的语篇连贯标准:外界的误解与自身的不足[J].外语教学与研究(1):20-24.
朱永生.2011.系统功能语言学中的个体发生学[J].中国外语(6):18-25.
Outlines

/