Interactions in linguistic text and multimodal text have long been respectively studied in linguistic field. However, comparative studies on the two kinds of texts are few. With the systemic functional approach, this research has compared a novel chapter with its corresponding film part in Pride and Prejudice, from the aspects of interaction type, degree and means. It is found that interactions between represented participants are similar between the two texts, but there are big differences in interactions between interactive participants and also between represented and interactive participants. This research helps better understand interactions in the two kinds of texts, and also contributes to resemioticization studies in which different semiotic resources are used to realize the same meaning.
QU Tao
. Interactions in Linguistic and Multimodal Texts: A Case Study of Pride and Prejudice[J]. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2015
, 15(09)
: 14
-19
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8921.2015.09.003
Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist trans) [M]. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.) [M]. London: Arnold.
Harris, Z. 1952. Discourse analysis [J]. Language 28: 1-30.
Iedema, R., S. Feez & P. R. R. White. 1994. Media Literacy. Write It Right Literacy in Industry Research Project -Stage 3 [M]. Sydney: NSW Department of School Education.
Kress, G. 2009. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication [M]. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design [M]. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication [M]. London: Arnold.
Martin, J. R. & D. Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause [M]. London: Continuum.
陈瑜敏、秦小怡.2007.教科书语篇多模式符号的介入意义与多声互动[J].外语与外语教学225(12):15-18.
管淑红、王雅丽.2006.小说话语的人际意义——试析“Blackmail”中人物的权势关系[J].外语与外语教学(4):10-13.
胡壮麟、朱永生、张德禄、李战子.2005.系统功能语言学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
季红琴.2011.《圣经》语言情态的人际意义解读[J].外语教学与研究43(2):230-38.
李战子.2001.功能语法中的人际意义框架的扩展[J].外语研究(1):48-54.
李战子.2003.多模式话语的社会符号学分析[J].外语研究(5):1-8.
袁传有.2008.警察讯问语言的人际意义——评价理论之“介入系统”视角[J].现代外语(2):141-49.
王振华、马玉蕾.2007.评价理论:魅力与困惑[J].外语教学28(6):19-23.
张德禄.2009.多模态话语分析综合理论框架探索[J].中国外语6(1):24-30.
朱永生.2007.多模态话语分析的理论基础与研究方法[J].外语学刊(5):82-86.
